Advanced fuel control options
Evolving Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
<table name="Injector Size Scaling" category="Fuel" type="1D" scaling="InjectorScaling" address="1108"/>
When I add this ^^ to my rom (88590015) it changes my injector sizing to 152, I copied everything over minus this and seems fine so far, have not uploaded rom into car yet still sorting it out.
When I add this ^^ to my rom (88590015) it changes my injector sizing to 152, I copied everything over minus this and seems fine so far, have not uploaded rom into car yet still sorting it out.
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
<table name="Injector Size Scaling" category="Fuel" type="1D" scaling="InjectorScaling" address="1108"/>
When I add this ^^ to my rom (88590015) it changes my injector sizing to 152, I copied everything over minus this and seems fine so far, have not uploaded rom into car yet still sorting it out.
When I add this ^^ to my rom (88590015) it changes my injector sizing to 152, I copied everything over minus this and seems fine so far, have not uploaded rom into car yet still sorting it out.
I agree though, make the change and you won't be disappointed. We are on a quest to find EVERY possible table in that ROM that we can.
On 96530006, there is a table at 3856.
Phenem's xml package has it listed as
Any idea if this is used or labeled correctly at all?
Phenem's xml package has it listed as
Code:
<table name="Accel Enrich Base vs Engine Temp" category="Global Fuel Settings" address="3856" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69be" type="X Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/> </table>
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
On 96530006, there is a table at 3856.
Phenem's xml package has it listed as
Any idea if this is used or labeled correctly at all?
Phenem's xml package has it listed as
Code:
<table name="Accel Enrich Base vs Engine Temp" category="Global Fuel Settings" address="3856" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69be" type="X Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/> </table>
More out of 96530006 that seemed to be related to post start enrichment in the past. These do not appear in Phenem's xml.
Code:
<table name="Count Down Multiper 3" address="3752"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table> <table name="Count Down Multiper 4" address="3762"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table> <table name="Count Down Multiper 5" address="3772"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table> <table name="Count Down Multiper 6" address="3782"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table>
Mrfred,
the Sync Load Accel Compensation vs RPM table has the same address as the improperly defined accel enrichment table in the 96530006 ROM. I remember that you called this table some sort of barometric pressure compensation table in the past. So is this table actually correct but not labelled accurately?
the Sync Load Accel Compensation vs RPM table has the same address as the improperly defined accel enrichment table in the 96530006 ROM. I remember that you called this table some sort of barometric pressure compensation table in the past. So is this table actually correct but not labelled accurately?
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
More out of 96530006 that seemed to be related to post start enrichment in the past. These do not appear in Phenem's xml.
Code:
<table name="Count Down Multiper 3" address="3752"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table> <table name="Count Down Multiper 4" address="3762"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table> <table name="Count Down Multiper 5" address="3772"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table> <table name="Count Down Multiper 6" address="3782"> <table name="Engine Temp" address="69d8"/> </table>
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Mrfred,
the Sync Load Accel Compensation vs RPM table has the same address as the improperly defined accel enrichment table in the 96530006 ROM. I remember that you called this table some sort of barometric pressure compensation table in the past. So is this table actually correct but not labelled accurately?
the Sync Load Accel Compensation vs RPM table has the same address as the improperly defined accel enrichment table in the 96530006 ROM. I remember that you called this table some sort of barometric pressure compensation table in the past. So is this table actually correct but not labelled accurately?
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
A couple of updates:
1) The second post has been updated with instructions on how to log each of the fuel pulse width components for the 8859XX15 ROM.
2) When I was working on the patch for the fuel component patch, I realized that I had left one factor out of the base fuel pulse width description. I'll try to add that to the first post tomorrow.
1) The second post has been updated with instructions on how to log each of the fuel pulse width components for the 8859XX15 ROM.
2) When I was working on the patch for the fuel component patch, I realized that I had left one factor out of the base fuel pulse width description. I'll try to add that to the first post tomorrow.
So... silly question, but in "2) Cranking fuel pulse width" we would actually want to do the standard (old_inj_size/new_inj_size)*1.3 on the TCOMP values for proper e85 starting?
I think luckily my injector sizing for E85 winds up being similar to stock for getting cold starts to work properly on E85, but it might be nice to have the correct values for gasoline also. Too bad this didn't come out until after v7!
I think luckily my injector sizing for E85 winds up being similar to stock for getting cold starts to work properly on E85, but it might be nice to have the correct values for gasoline also. Too bad this didn't come out until after v7!
Last edited by fostytou; Oct 25, 2009 at 10:25 AM.
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
So... silly question, but in "2) Cranking fuel pulse width" we would actually want to do the standard (old_inj_size/new_inj_size)*1.3 on the TCOMP values for proper e85 starting?
I think luckily my injector sizing for E85 winds up being similar to stock for getting cold starts to work properly on E85, but it might be nice to have the correct values for gasoline also. Too bad this didn't come out until after v7!
I think luckily my injector sizing for E85 winds up being similar to stock for getting cold starts to work properly on E85, but it might be nice to have the correct values for gasoline also. Too bad this didn't come out until after v7!