Notices
ECU Flash

Omni 4 bar MAP sensor "too much sensor" for reasonable boost levels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 06:01 PM
  #1  
motocooney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Omni 4 bar MAP sensor "too much sensor" for reasonable boost levels?

I'm looking to get a MAP sensor to log boost finally.....I can get an Omni 4bar for really cheap but after reading Mr. Freds how to set it up. It says something about running more than 35psi.

I'm only running 23-24psi (I think...my boost gauge says so...thus buying a map sensor)...

Will this work just fine? Or do I need a 3bar?

Thanks so much!!!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 06:02 PM
  #2  
boosted91t's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 723
Likes: 1
From: New Oxford, Pa
The higher the bar rating the more boost it can register
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 06:09 PM
  #3  
evo420's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 360
Likes: 9
From: CA
works great for most evo applications
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 06:44 PM
  #4  
211Ratsbud's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,286
Likes: 43
From: Watertown, NY
ive been using the 4 bar for a few months now. I thihnk head room is the only benefit to using the higher bar rating..
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 07:34 PM
  #5  
Fast_Freddie's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Navy
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,706
Likes: 15
From: Lexington Park, MD
You could always get a JDM sensor which is good to about 33 psi
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 07:57 PM
  #6  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
I had no problems with a 5 bar sensor which only read from 0.5 to 4.5 volts. I believe you should get the largest sensor you feel comfortable with. With 10bit resolution even a 7 bar sensor would have resolution down to to less than 0.7 kPa which is 0.09psi plenty of resolution to even run a fully N/A car.

Expense should be the limiting factor here and ease of placement. At this time there are no sensors cheaper and easier to install than a 4 bar omni. My 5 bar kavlico was almost 2x as expensive to get running because of wiring adapters and mdp adapters needed for fitment.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2011 | 09:17 PM
  #7  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Best to get the most well supported sensor.

then you dont have to come up with your own scalings.

ALSO technically the 4bar has less resolution than a 3bar (because its for a greater spectrum to cover)

however for our purposes you dont need to worry about that...
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2011 | 03:34 AM
  #8  
motocooney's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Grand Rapids, MI
4 bar it is. Resolution at lower boost levels was all I was concerned with.

But if the difference between the 3bar and 4bar is neglegible. Then it would make sense to go with the 4bar simply because there is a stupid simple "how to" already

Thanks for the help dudes!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
browningderek
ECU Flash
27
Sep 11, 2025 05:32 AM
JDavenport
ECU Flash
10
Jun 14, 2013 09:47 AM
Hi Im Vinh
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Aug 24, 2012 06:16 PM
sevy2213
ECU Flash
16
Oct 2, 2009 09:53 AM
mrfred
ECU Flash
10
Aug 14, 2009 07:17 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:54 AM.