Idle Stability map?
Evolving Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
for 55590007 - sorry the only rom i had:
Code:
<scaling name="Idle RPM Offset" units="RPM diff" toexpr="(x-32768)*1000/256" frexpr="(x*256/1000)+32768" format="%.2f" min="0" max="100" inc="0.5" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/> <table name="Idle Timing Compensation 1" category="Idle" address="5fc46" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation"> <table name="RPM" address="62900" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/> </table> <table name="Idle Timing Compensation 2" category="Idle" address="5f66e" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation"> <table name="RPM" address="62900" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/> </table>
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
One thing I noticed real quick is that the target error looks like what I posted more or less but with the other axis doesnt appear correct? I am getting numbers in the 2000 range?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I have the error column which goes from -199 to +199 but the other column (I guess axis isnt the right word) is not using numbers as I know them. Is it supposed to be timing in that column? It said RPM or something and then when I labelled it I got a blank in the xml. I may have added the wrong scaling.
Evolved Member
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
Hey tephra,
Those two pairs of tables you defined... for 55590006 and 53040010...
They aren't the same. In each ROM, there is a pair of tables referenced... then 20 lines later, a second pair of tables is referenced.
The def for 5304 is for the "top pair". The def for 5559 is for the "bottom pair".
Can you please clarify? Anything you know would help.
Cheers,
Rich
Those two pairs of tables you defined... for 55590006 and 53040010...
They aren't the same. In each ROM, there is a pair of tables referenced... then 20 lines later, a second pair of tables is referenced.
The def for 5304 is for the "top pair". The def for 5559 is for the "bottom pair".
Can you please clarify? Anything you know would help.
Cheers,
Rich
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
But I figured out I dont have the scaling called IgnitionCompensation.
Last edited by JohnBradley; Sep 19, 2012 at 11:09 AM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
NM, I found it with a quick google. So this is 2D where the STI adds an axis for MAP but this should be able to do it I think. I also figured out what the issue was, the IGT#1 had weird values, the IGT#2 matches your description.
I guess the next thing I would be curious about is if we can log where it is on this, though using some common sense I guess if the idle isnt what its set to then we know it needs bumped up.
aaron
I guess the next thing I would be curious about is if we can log where it is on this, though using some common sense I guess if the idle isnt what its set to then we know it needs bumped up.
aaron
Hey tephra,
Those two pairs of tables you defined... for 55590006 and 53040010...
They aren't the same. In each ROM, there is a pair of tables referenced... then 20 lines later, a second pair of tables is referenced.
The def for 5304 is for the "top pair". The def for 5559 is for the "bottom pair".
Can you please clarify? Anything you know would help.
Cheers,
Rich
Those two pairs of tables you defined... for 55590006 and 53040010...
They aren't the same. In each ROM, there is a pair of tables referenced... then 20 lines later, a second pair of tables is referenced.
The def for 5304 is for the "top pair". The def for 5559 is for the "bottom pair".
Can you please clarify? Anything you know would help.
Cheers,
Rich
I've updated my original post (https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/10405980-post12.html) with all 4...