Notices

Idle Stability map?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Idle Stability map?

So in the AP software for an STI (yes I realise this is the X forum) there is an additional idle control table called the "Idle Stability". It is a 3D table with MAP as an axis and then idle speed error. It stretches from a negative value from target evenly out to an overshoot value. The 3rd axis is some sort of control unit, lets say stepper control since thats easy or PWM more likely.

I hadn't ever played with it before today, but I had an STi with a 10lb flywheel that would not idle after a rev. Basically this works more or less like a mechanical throttle stop and responds very fast.

Whole point of this thread is the idle control is not well mapped and while the idle adder vs coolant help things, it is not the end all be all for idle control. Especially when large cams are employed it can be very tricky still to get them stable. So have any of the disassemblers who have been looking into advanced idle control come across a weird 3d idle map?

Aaron
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 06:13 PM
  #2  
kozmic27's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
That set of tables in the Subaru software is VERY nice. Especially when you get a car with cams, light flywheels, port work....I just wish it was real time.

I assume this is for the evo x you are referring. I don't know if those tables exist, but there is a work around that is effective. I have found that when you raise all of the idle tables up, both the temp based and the target ones (all 28 or 30 of them), Idle will generally stabilize, even with cams, high compression and port work. Generally I don't raise any of the values that are over 1000 rpm.

What will throw a wrench in all of this is the sensitivity the car has to air flow disturbances accross the maf, particularily if not running a heat shield or air deflector of some type to block air from the secondary cooling fan. You can see the effect of unstable air flow at low maf volts simply by opening the hood while the car sits on the dyno with the big fans running. Add an oversized maf housing, (3.5"+) and it can get pretty unstable. Add big injectors it gets even worse. The effect of all of this is the car adding or pulling to much fuel at idle or just off idle in closed loop.

You can tune this out. Once you have recorded your stabilized load at idle with both the a/c on and a/c off (the a/c forces the secondary fan on), you can then narrow the open closed loop load points down to stop the car from adding or pulling to much fuel. Because of how load is calculated, you can stabilize the idle in this fashion. This is very effective for getting big 2000cc injectors to idle nicely on gasoline. Basically what you are doing is forcing the car to go into open loop when it starts pulling or adding enough fuel to cause the idle rpm to drop. The car will then momentarily go into open loop, fueling and rpm will stabilize, and the car will go back into closed loop. The car will not stay in open loop long enough to set a cel once this is set up correctly. It is kind of a pain to do this, but it works. An added benefit is that this also interupts the cars learning and reduces the likelyhood of getting overly negative fuel trims on very large injectors in the idle ranges because the car doesn't stay in closed loop long enough to applly learning.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 06:21 PM
  #3  
richardjh's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
Aaron, can you post up a picture of the STi 3D map.

Thanks to Javier (lodifreefly) on EvoM, I've got over three hundred raw tables defined in my EcuFlash... basically, nearly every 2D and 3D table there is. That was from an XML that was auto-generated by his ROM-bot.

Instead of crawling around in the code for an evening or three, let's see if we can just work backwards from something that closely resembles it in the endless fields of "unknown" tables in front of me...

Rich

PS. This isn't secret squirrel stuff. Anyone with a propeller on their hat can access Javier's source, build and run the tool, etc. It sniffs out tables and scales for our browsing pleasure. As Beeble commented in the linked thread, "God mode: enabled".
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2012 | 11:17 PM
  #4  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I will tomorrow when I get back into the shop.

aaron
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2012 | 01:21 PM
  #5  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 05:26 AM
  #6  
richardjh's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 2,447
Likes: 14
From: Australia
I can't see anything remotely like that style table...

Looks like this will need to be done The Hard Way!

Rich
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 08:06 AM
  #7  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Thats how I have been doing it (the Hard Way) but was hoping there was some sort of an idle error correction map. I would imagine there is, just not like this, perhaps 2D?
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2012 | 05:03 PM
  #8  
kozmic27's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
It might looks alot like the idle air control valve idle error tables in the earlier Evo's.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 05:35 PM
  #9  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by kozmic27
It might looks alot like the idle air control valve idle error tables in the earlier Evo's.
True
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2012 | 06:52 PM
  #10  
E-SPEC INDUSTRIES's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: NY
On certain cars I would KILL for a biss screw,,,lol

On big cam/aftermarket springs keep an eye on the ex mivec...

Otherwise in for more idle definitions and PAYPAL READY!! Hint hint hint!!
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2012 | 09:04 PM
  #11  
kozmic27's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 653
Likes: 12
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by E-SPEC INDUSTRIES
On certain cars I would KILL for a biss screw,,,lol

On big cam/aftermarket springs keep an eye on the ex mivec...

Otherwise in for more idle definitions and PAYPAL READY!! Hint hint hint!!
The evo x does NOT like dual valve springs. At idle there just isn't enough oil pressure to work 2 valve timing actuators with heavy dual springs, especially on rebuilt engines that have looser than OEM bearing clearances. Most cars will tolerate behive single springs just fine though. I would consider titanium retainers a must as well. I know the single bee hives are good to 9500 rpm. This isn't speculation. We have confirmed uncontrollable exh mivec at low rpm/loads with dual springs on multiple cars, and after switching them to single bee hive springs had the problem go away.

Try the load tables in my earlier post for stabilizign big injector/cam cars at idle. It takes a bit of fidling, but it does work.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 03:43 PM
  #12  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
I have a timing based stability map.

2d though, so purely under/overshoot and how much timing to add or subtract in differing amounts...

This is for 53040010 - I'm sure you chaps can work it out from there
Code:
<scaling name="Idle RPM Offset" units="RPM diff" toexpr="(x-32768)*1000/256" frexpr="(x*256/1000)+32768" format="%.2f" min="0" max="100" inc="0.5" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
<table name="Idle Timing Compensation 1.1" category="Idle" address="5f59e" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation">
	<table name="RPM" address="626e4" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/>
</table>

<table name="Idle Timing Compensation 1.2" category="Idle" address="5f5c0" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation">
	<table name="RPM" address="626e4" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/>
</table>

<table name="Idle Timing Compensation 2.1" category="Idle" address="5f55a" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation">
	<table name="RPM" address="626e4" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/>
</table>

<table name="Idle Timing Compensation 2.2" category="Idle" address="5f57c" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation">
	<table name="RPM" address="626e4" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/>
</table>

Last edited by tephra; Sep 19, 2012 at 04:19 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 05:22 PM
  #13  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Awesome That will make a drastic improvement though I am with Kozmic and realise what he is saying about getting the fuel dialed closer.

Aaron
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 08:28 PM
  #14  
RS200Z's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Is the RPM Diff axis based on Current RPM minus Target RPM or the other way round?

Originally Posted by tephra
I have a timing based stability map.

2d though, so purely under/overshoot and how much timing to add or subtract in differing amounts...

This is for 53040010 - I'm sure you chaps can work it out from there
Code:
<scaling name="Idle RPM Offset" units="RPM diff" toexpr="(x-32768)*1000/256" frexpr="(x*256/1000)+32768" format="%.2f" min="0" max="100" inc="0.5" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
<table name="Idle Timing Compensation" category="Idle" address="5f59e" type="2D" swapxy="false" scaling="IgnitionCompensation">
	<table name="RPM" address="626e4" type="Y Axis" elements="29" scaling="Idle RPM Offset"/>
</table>
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2012 | 12:17 AM
  #15  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
err im not 100%

im pretty sure it increases timing when its under target...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:51 AM.