help with negative fuel trims
I wanted to verify this on stunt2's IV and my VIII. His were at -9 ltft and mine were at -10 ltft. We both reset our trims. Made pulls and no difference in AFR's.
These were both done yesterday. I'm curious about the results of the 9's. I'll be tuning a 9 shortly, but he's all stock, so I wouldn't imagine the trims to be a factor.
These were both done yesterday. I'm curious about the results of the 9's. I'll be tuning a 9 shortly, but he's all stock, so I wouldn't imagine the trims to be a factor.
Last edited by 10isace; Apr 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM. Reason: Stunt2 has an Evo IV
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
I wanted to verify this on stunt2's VIII and my VIII. His were at -9 ltft and mine were at -10 ltft. We both reset our trims. Made pulls and no difference in AFR's.
These were both done yesterday on 2 seperate VIII's. I'm curious about the results of the 9's. I'll be tuning a 9 shortly, but he's all stock, so I wouldn't imagine the trims to be a factor.
These were both done yesterday on 2 seperate VIII's. I'm curious about the results of the 9's. I'll be tuning a 9 shortly, but he's all stock, so I wouldn't imagine the trims to be a factor.
Boosted Tuning
is there any point for this, if rewired pump will still cause overfueling ?
besides, I have actual afr quite leaner than map afr and bumping the scaling will throw it off even more leaner
is there any point ?
OP, Raise your scaling by 2-3 "steps".
besides, I have actual afr quite leaner than map afr and bumping the scaling will throw it off even more leaner
is there any point ?
As mrfred stated earlier, you don't need to change anything to account for your negative Lo and Mid trims. It's more than likely due to your rewired pump. If you start messing with things, you are just going to affect your WOT AFR and be chasing your tail.
If anything, you can mess with your maf smoothing at the lower airflows to adjust fueling in just those airflow ranges.
If anything, you can mess with your maf smoothing at the lower airflows to adjust fueling in just those airflow ranges.
I just checked the Evo 8 (94170015) engine control code, and the LTFT trim for WOT is definitely there. Its only the mid-LTFT (and unused high-LTFT) that will affect WOT, and if the LTFT Control Ranges have been changed, then that will affect the range of air flow rates where the LTFT plays a role.
Funny the 9653 rom doesn't have that included.
Anyhow, I do see how the trims can affect WOT up to the max airflow. However, comparing the 2 back to back logs, everything below max airflow is not affected by resetting the trims.
Maybe 9653 doens't use trims for WOT and 9417 does.
As mrfred stated earlier, you don't need to change anything to account for your negative Lo and Mid trims. It's more than likely due to your rewired pump. If you start messing with things, you are just going to affect your WOT AFR and be chasing your tail.
If anything, you can mess with your maf smoothing at the lower airflows to adjust fueling in just those airflow ranges.
If anything, you can mess with your maf smoothing at the lower airflows to adjust fueling in just those airflow ranges.
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
We're both using the 9653. I put in the closed loop LT Trim control table to check our roms and they are same as the 9417 in the mid to high and high to mid. Mid to low was at 62.50 versus the 9417 at 56.25.
Funny the 9653 rom doesn't have that included.
Anyhow, I do see how the trims can affect WOT up to the max airflow. However, comparing the 2 back to back logs, everything below max airflow is not affected by resetting the trims.
Maybe 9653 doens't use trims for WOT and 9417 does.
Funny the 9653 rom doesn't have that included.
Anyhow, I do see how the trims can affect WOT up to the max airflow. However, comparing the 2 back to back logs, everything below max airflow is not affected by resetting the trims.
Maybe 9653 doens't use trims for WOT and 9417 does.
I just checked, and it does at well. 95% or more of the engine control code is identical across the Evo 8/9 ROMs. I guess its strange that you're not seeing the effect, but the hotwired fuel pump could obscuring it. One thing you can do is try logging MUT50. This is the LTFT that's being used in the fuel calculation. It uses the same scaling as the other LTFTs do in EvoScan. At any rate, the real solution is to unhotwire the pump.
I'll log mut 50 and see what's going on. So that will show the fuel trim as it's happening, correct?
Here is a pic of my logs from yesterday:
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Is the mid trim the -4 or -10 value in your log?
The fuel trims absolutely do affect WOT fueling in the 8/9. Read my thread on the fuel pulse calculation, and if you don't believe it after that, its quite a simple matter to verify it by logging AFR with a mid (cruise) fuel trim that is strongly negative or positive. Assuming the fuel trim operation range is at its stock setting, upon crossing an airflow of 1597 Hz, there will be an obvious step-change in the wideband reading.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-options.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-options.html
And the CL/OL tables are tps based and load based and soon as you go over those limits, the car go to 100% open loop n the fuel trims dont affect WOT afr (IMO).
Nevermind, didnt know you were on stock injectors. Thought you were trying to scale larger aftermarket injectors.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Green_Bandit
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
2
Jun 19, 2013 04:39 PM







