Notices
ECU Flash

help with negative fuel trims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 10:04 AM
  #16  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
I wanted to verify this on stunt2's IV and my VIII. His were at -9 ltft and mine were at -10 ltft. We both reset our trims. Made pulls and no difference in AFR's.

These were both done yesterday. I'm curious about the results of the 9's. I'll be tuning a 9 shortly, but he's all stock, so I wouldn't imagine the trims to be a factor.

Last edited by 10isace; Apr 25, 2013 at 11:20 AM. Reason: Stunt2 has an Evo IV
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 11:34 AM
  #17  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by 10isace
I wanted to verify this on stunt2's VIII and my VIII. His were at -9 ltft and mine were at -10 ltft. We both reset our trims. Made pulls and no difference in AFR's.

These were both done yesterday on 2 seperate VIII's. I'm curious about the results of the 9's. I'll be tuning a 9 shortly, but he's all stock, so I wouldn't imagine the trims to be a factor.
I just checked the Evo 8 (94170015) engine control code, and the LTFT trim for WOT is definitely there. Its only the mid-LTFT (and unused high-LTFT) that will affect WOT, and if the LTFT Control Ranges have been changed, then that will affect the range of air flow rates where the LTFT plays a role.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
stunt2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 753
Likes: 1
From: Georgia
Boosted Tuning
OP, Raise your scaling by 2-3 "steps".
is there any point for this, if rewired pump will still cause overfueling ?

besides, I have actual afr quite leaner than map afr and bumping the scaling will throw it off even more leaner

is there any point ?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 12:20 PM
  #19  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
As mrfred stated earlier, you don't need to change anything to account for your negative Lo and Mid trims. It's more than likely due to your rewired pump. If you start messing with things, you are just going to affect your WOT AFR and be chasing your tail.

If anything, you can mess with your maf smoothing at the lower airflows to adjust fueling in just those airflow ranges.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 01:10 PM
  #20  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by mrfred
I just checked the Evo 8 (94170015) engine control code, and the LTFT trim for WOT is definitely there. Its only the mid-LTFT (and unused high-LTFT) that will affect WOT, and if the LTFT Control Ranges have been changed, then that will affect the range of air flow rates where the LTFT plays a role.
We're both using the 9653. I put in the closed loop LT Trim control table to check our roms and they are same as the 9417 in the mid to high and high to mid. Mid to low was at 62.50 versus the 9417 at 56.25.

Funny the 9653 rom doesn't have that included.

Anyhow, I do see how the trims can affect WOT up to the max airflow. However, comparing the 2 back to back logs, everything below max airflow is not affected by resetting the trims.

Maybe 9653 doens't use trims for WOT and 9417 does.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 01:13 PM
  #21  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by stunt2
Boosted Tuning

is there any point for this, if rewired pump will still cause overfueling ?

besides, I have actual afr quite leaner than map afr and bumping the scaling will throw it off even more leaner

is there any point ?
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
As mrfred stated earlier, you don't need to change anything to account for your negative Lo and Mid trims. It's more than likely due to your rewired pump. If you start messing with things, you are just going to affect your WOT AFR and be chasing your tail.

If anything, you can mess with your maf smoothing at the lower airflows to adjust fueling in just those airflow ranges.
We're actually lowering his scaling due to running lean at WOT. This may affect his trims even more. I'll adjust his maf smoothing in the idle and cruise ranges. Thanks l2r99gst
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 02:03 PM
  #22  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by 10isace
We're both using the 9653. I put in the closed loop LT Trim control table to check our roms and they are same as the 9417 in the mid to high and high to mid. Mid to low was at 62.50 versus the 9417 at 56.25.

Funny the 9653 rom doesn't have that included.

Anyhow, I do see how the trims can affect WOT up to the max airflow. However, comparing the 2 back to back logs, everything below max airflow is not affected by resetting the trims.

Maybe 9653 doens't use trims for WOT and 9417 does.
I just checked, and it does at well. 95% or more of the engine control code is identical across the Evo 8/9 ROMs. I guess its strange that you're not seeing the effect, but the hotwired fuel pump could obscuring it. One thing you can do is try logging MUT50. This is the LTFT that's being used in the fuel calculation. It uses the same scaling as the other LTFTs do in EvoScan. At any rate, the real solution is to unhotwire the pump.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 02:09 PM
  #23  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by mrfred
I just checked, and it does at well. 95% or more of the engine control code is identical across the Evo 8/9 ROMs. I guess its strange that you're not seeing the effect, but the hotwired fuel pump could obscuring it. One thing you can do is try logging MUT50. This is the LTFT that's being used in the fuel calculation. It uses the same scaling as the other LTFTs do in EvoScan. At any rate, the real solution is to unhotwire the pump.
I agree. Isn't there a Spoolin Up rewire kit in the works?

I'll log mut 50 and see what's going on. So that will show the fuel trim as it's happening, correct?

Here is a pic of my logs from yesterday:

Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 02:22 PM
  #24  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by 10isace
I agree. Isn't there a Spoolin Up rewire kit in the works?

I'll log mut 50 and see what's going on. So that will show the fuel trim as it's happening, correct?

Here is a pic of my logs from yesterday:

...
Yep and Yep. The rewire is getting close. Just working out some details that really are only specific to the E85 Walbro.

Is the mid trim the -4 or -10 value in your log?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 02:33 PM
  #25  
10isace's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,058
Likes: 16
From: East of the Rockies
Originally Posted by mrfred
Yep and Yep. The rewire is getting close. Just working out some details that really are only specific to the E85 Walbro.

Is the mid trim the -4 or -10 value in your log?
Yes, low is -4 and mid is -10.5.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 06:13 PM
  #26  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by mrfred
The fuel trims absolutely do affect WOT fueling in the 8/9. Read my thread on the fuel pulse calculation, and if you don't believe it after that, its quite a simple matter to verify it by logging AFR with a mid (cruise) fuel trim that is strongly negative or positive. Assuming the fuel trim operation range is at its stock setting, upon crossing an airflow of 1597 Hz, there will be an obvious step-change in the wideband reading.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...l-options.html
Ok. But I have NEVER seen it in the EVO 8/9s I have tuned.

And the CL/OL tables are tps based and load based and soon as you go over those limits, the car go to 100% open loop n the fuel trims dont affect WOT afr (IMO).
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2013 | 06:17 PM
  #27  
Boosted Tuning's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 8
From: Chico, CA (Nor-Cal)
Originally Posted by stunt2
Boosted Tuning

is there any point for this, if rewired pump will still cause overfueling ?

besides, I have actual afr quite leaner than map afr and bumping the scaling will throw it off even more leaner

is there any point ?
Nevermind, didnt know you were on stock injectors. Thought you were trying to scale larger aftermarket injectors.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast_Freddie
ECU Flash
309
Oct 30, 2023 01:56 AM
Green_Bandit
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
2
Jun 19, 2013 04:39 PM
lp_ceo
ECU Flash
12
Sep 29, 2010 07:22 PM
AlwaysinBoost
ECU Flash
8
Sep 23, 2010 12:30 PM
nj1266
ECU Flash
7
Jun 14, 2008 08:29 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 AM.