What is responsible for terminating the SAS routine in the stock ecu? I'm getting more refinement of my hardware now I'm looking at the transition back to wide open throttle. It would be nice possibly to be able to adjust that threshold on both sides of the routine if possible.

Activating seems to be solely based on load.. But deactivation causes a hesitation / fuel cut.

 

Isn't it just when the timer expires? If I went back on the throttle within the time the timer was set to run the routine for, i'd get breakup and hesitation which I thought was due to the valve still being open creating a massive boost leak of sorts. Would be nice if you could make it cancel it with a TPS% threshold trigger.

 

No I run with no valve and it still has the hesitation .

If you set the timer to 12 seconds and juice it again after 4 does the valve close? It has a one way valve . To prevent reversion. So maybe that is the case. That it stays on for the timer duration.

But the hesitation is still there with out any sas plumbing.

I wonder if we can change te timer units to tps or something so that if throttle is applied it kills the routine ?

 

At the same time the hesitation does not fulfill the rest of the timer

 

Could it be fueling related while it's firing the injectors during the routine? That duration is configurable and recommended to be less than the total routine time.

Yes ideally you'd want it to turn off as soon as throttle is reapplied. It drove me nuts and made me slower due to the hesitation with no noticeable effect on spool time so I disabled it. The basic hardware is extremely similar to the WRC hardware from what I can see in pictures, but I think the stock ECU just can't manage it a) and produce decent antilag and b)with the features/sensitivity you need from WRC level antilag systems.

Would be nice if it could, I like the work you've been doing with it.

 

I'm making small improvements here and there. Right now trying to fab a little more appropriate hardware inspired by the wrc/wtc/btc.

I've been trying to get other people motivated and interested in this for a while. To prove it works I need shaft speed measure with and with out the system activated. Even then its likely not to interest enough people to warrant a guru to attack it willingly. However if someone were interested in deciphering any further of the code or investigating a bit more I'm willing to work with them and compensate as determined fit.

 

any other disassembleer's out there who might be able to chime in?