New help finding some maps in two ROMS
Sep 20, 2009, 01:47 AM
#1
New help finding some maps in two ROMS
First I need to find the "low coolant temp timing trim map" for ROM 96420008
And I need the "decel fuel cut" maps for ROM 96940011
I have searched for hours, and still cant find the addresses for those tables in those ROMs.
Here is a link that discusses those tables for other ROMs
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...evo-7-9-a.html
And I need the "decel fuel cut" maps for ROM 96940011
I have searched for hours, and still cant find the addresses for those tables in those ROMs.
Here is a link that discusses those tables for other ROMs
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ec...evo-7-9-a.html
Last edited by Evo_Jay; Sep 20, 2009 at 01:50 AM.
Sep 20, 2009, 06:31 AM
#2
It looks like this is what you want for 96420008:
And this is what I found for 96940011:
I have no idea about Decel Fuel Cut Delay #2 or #4; if I'm reading this right, it looks like they're just duplicates of #1 and #3? Someone else want to take a peek? 
Code:
<table name="Low Coolant Temp Timing Trim Map" category="Timing" type="3D" level="2" swapxy="true" scaling="TimingTrim8" address="3ff5"> <table name="Engine Load" type="X Axis" elements="19" scaling="Load" address="6820"/> <table name="RPM" type="Y Axis" elements="20" scaling="RPM" address="67ee"/> </table>
Code:
<table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #1" category="Fuel" address="3972" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="5d52" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #3" category="Fuel" address="3986" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="5d52" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Retard" category="Fuel" address="39A6" type="2D" level="2" scaling="Timing"> <table name="Engine Speed" address="5a22" type="X Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/> </table>
Last edited by logic; Sep 21, 2009 at 01:31 PM. Reason: Fixed axes for 96940011.
Sep 20, 2009, 06:51 AM
#5
The scaling is from evo7base_20081101.xml:
96420008 hasn't been ported over to use that evo7base yet; sorry, I forgot to check if the scaling was defined.
For 96420008's EGR timing tables, it looks like this is it:
So far, all these addresses have been the same as 96530006 (the main table, not the axes).
(And don't thank me yet, make sure they look right/work right first.
)
Code:
<scaling name="TimingTrim8" units="units" toexpr="x-128" frexpr="x+128" format="%.0f" min="-128" max="128" inc="1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big" />
For 96420008's EGR timing tables, it looks like this is it:
Code:
<table name="High Oct EGR-Enabled Advance" category="Timing" type="3D" level="2" swapxy="true" scaling="Timing" address="3e6d"> <table name="Engine Load" type="X Axis" elements="19" scaling="Load" address="6820"/> <table name="RPM" type="Y Axis" elements="20" scaling="RPM" address="67ee"/> </table> <table name="Low Oct EGR-Enabled Advance" category="Timing" type="3D" level="2" swapxy="true" scaling="Timing" address="3ce5"> <table name="Engine Load" type="X Axis" elements="19" scaling="Load" address="6820"/> <table name="RPM" type="Y Axis" elements="20" scaling="RPM" address="67ee"/> </table>
(And don't thank me yet, make sure they look right/work right first.
)
Sep 20, 2009, 07:06 AM
#7
The scaling is from evo7base_20081101.xml:
96420008 hasn't been ported over to use that evo7base yet; sorry, I forgot to check if the scaling was defined.
For 96420008's EGR timing tables, it looks like this is it:
So far, all these addresses have been the same as 96530006 (the main table, not the axes).
(And don't thank me yet, make sure they look right/work right first.)
Code:
<scaling name="TimingTrim8" units="units" toexpr="x-128" frexpr="x+128" format="%.0f" min="-128" max="128" inc="1" storagetype="uint8" endian="big" />
For 96420008's EGR timing tables, it looks like this is it:
Code:
<table name="High Oct EGR-Enabled Advance" category="Timing" type="3D" level="2" swapxy="true" scaling="Timing" address="3e6d"> <table name="Engine Load" type="X Axis" elements="19" scaling="Load" address="6820"/> <table name="RPM" type="Y Axis" elements="20" scaling="RPM" address="67ee"/> </table> <table name="Low Oct EGR-Enabled Advance" category="Timing" type="3D" level="2" swapxy="true" scaling="Timing" address="3ce5"> <table name="Engine Load" type="X Axis" elements="19" scaling="Load" address="6820"/> <table name="RPM" type="Y Axis" elements="20" scaling="RPM" address="67ee"/> </table>
(And don't thank me yet, make sure they look right/work right first.
)Last edited by Evo_Jay; Sep 20, 2009 at 07:15 AM.
Trending Topics
Sep 20, 2009, 08:03 AM
#10
Ah, yes, sorry about that; I didn't look up the load axis on those 2D tables; that's what I get for cutting and pasting. Looks like your pick is off by one; try the address "5d52" for the load axes, and "594e" for the Engine Speed axis on the Decel Fuel Cut Retard table. (I updated the original post.)
Looks like your pick is off by one; try the address "5d52" for the load axes, and "594e" for the Engine Speed axis on the Decel Fuel Cut Retard table. (I updated the original post.)
Last edited by logic; Sep 20, 2009 at 08:07 AM.
Sep 21, 2009, 07:43 AM
#12
This looks like it for 96420008:
Code:
<table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #1" category="Fuel" address="42bc" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="688a" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #2" category="Fuel" address="42ca" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="688a" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #3" category="Fuel" address="42d8" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="688a" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #4" category="Fuel" address="42e6" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="688a" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Retard" category="Fuel" address="4300" type="2D" level="2" scaling="Timing"> <table name="Engine Speed" address="6486" type="X Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/> </table>
Sep 21, 2009, 01:18 PM
#14
It looks like this is what you want for 96420008:
And this is what I found for 96940011:
I have no idea about Decel Fuel Cut Delay #2 or #4; if I'm reading this right, it looks like they're just duplicates of #1 and #3? Someone else want to take a peek?
Code:
<table name="Low Coolant Temp Timing Trim Map" category="Timing" type="3D" level="2" swapxy="true" scaling="TimingTrim8" address="3ff5"> <table name="Engine Load" type="X Axis" elements="19" scaling="Load" address="6820"/> <table name="RPM" type="Y Axis" elements="20" scaling="RPM" address="67ee"/> </table>
Code:
<table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #1" category="Fuel" address="3972" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="5d52" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Delay #3" category="Fuel" address="3986" type="2D" level="2" scaling="uint8"> <table name="Load" address="5d52" type="X Axis" elements="7" scaling="Load"/> </table> <table name="Decel Fuel Cut Retard" category="Fuel" address="39A6" type="2D" level="2" scaling="Timing"> <table name="Engine Speed" address="594e" type="X Axis" elements="10" scaling="RPM"/> </table>
Do you have the info for #2 and #4 for the 96940011, even if they look like duplicates?
Sep 21, 2009, 01:30 PM
#15
No, I mean #2 and #4 appear to reference the exact same tables as #1 and #3 (ie. same ROM addresses). It's kind of a messed up situation, and will probably force me to actually read the code for sub_CC6 and sub_C28 and figure out how the heck that table gets parsed.
I could be misreading this, though, which is why I'd love someone else to take a quick peek. l2r99gst, if you're reading this, are you still even remotely interested in 96940011?
Also, it looks like I might have been wrong about the Engine Speed axis for Decel Fuel Cut Retard; the address is actually 5a22, not 594e. (Not that it matters, unless you're planning on rescaling it, since the values are the same, but better to be accurate.) Again, I've re-edited my post to reflect the correct value.
I could be misreading this, though, which is why I'd love someone else to take a quick peek. l2r99gst, if you're reading this, are you still even remotely interested in 96940011?
Also, it looks like I might have been wrong about the Engine Speed axis for Decel Fuel Cut Retard; the address is actually 5a22, not 594e. (Not that it matters, unless you're planning on rescaling it, since the values are the same, but better to be accurate.) Again, I've re-edited my post to reflect the correct value.