Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Speed Density tuning an EVO8 w/dyno sheets

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:19 AM
  #46  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by 4kinboost
Not starting anything,,,,

But since project white@450hp traps almost the same as Ryu@550hp, I think this is an understatement.

Sorry to drift off-topic.
Since ChaoticHoax made it clear that dyno numbers talk would end in infraction points, yet some have not abided, we have no intention of discussing that here.

What we can say is that ProjectWhite weighs considerably less than RyuEvoIX and this is a considerable factor when it comes to E.T. and MPH performance as someone mentioned.

We are glad that Dave has worked with MD to get his rpm roll speed calibration corrected and we do understand the frustration cal changes make to all prior data which is why we will never change our calibration as it will negate all prior tests and prior customer files for comparison purposes.

We use a weather station for SAE J1349 and Buschur does not. It is a personal decision that each company has decided to make and there is no right or wrong way to do it.

From the sounds of it, it appears that the customer is happy with the performance with a fun car to drive, primarily in road racing. The way I see it, is that there will be a new FPRed Evo terrorizing a track near you, courtesy of BR.

All the best!
TTP
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #47  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
very nice i bet that car responds great. very good numbers to considering BR's dyno is one low reading b*tch ....
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 12:02 PM
  #48  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Uh, Project White was 100% full weight. We aren't talking about the Bad Bish here. NOTHING was out of Project White other than front/rear bumpers. 2003 with sunroof, a/c etc.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 12:30 PM
  #49  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Also check the timestamps, looks like Mike posted at the same time as chaotix
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 12:32 PM
  #50  
AWD Motorsports's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (211)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 9,665
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Originally Posted by scheides
Also check the timestamps, looks like Mike posted at the same time as chaotix
I guess i was posting at the same time.. It happens..

I wont discuss the dyno any further as per mod request.. However I have spoken with RYU and i am confident Project white is heavier than his car..

Mike
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #51  
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
From: In da streetz
congrats on the new power Rich.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 01:51 PM
  #52  
ozzome's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: California
that looks awesome, keep up the good work
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 02:46 PM
  #53  
Early EVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 268
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
Anxious to try a speed density setup on an 04 RS. Currently running E85 on a IX turbo. Been sort of maxed out at the power its making now. Want to do a real back to back test on the same day this winter so I can post up mass air versus SD results for my setup. My MD dyno has WCF too. But in the winter I prefer to only look at the actual numbers but I do use the weather station to tell me if my test day is as close as possible to the previous test day. So it does have some use. I always want my own test results to be as camparitive as possible without many outside variables. Also as far was calibration of the dyno. I also leave it alone. No major variable changes. Although it doesn't hurt to check the calibration atleast once a year. MD suggests more often than that. Its like anything else mechanical, it won't remain static forever.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #54  
RoadSpike's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,805
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by Early EVO
Anxious to try a speed density setup on an 04 RS. Currently running E85 on a IX turbo. Been sort of maxed out at the power its making now. Want to do a real back to back test on the same day this winter so I can post up mass air versus SD results for my setup. My MD dyno has WCF too. But in the winter I prefer to only look at the actual numbers but I do use the weather station to tell me if my test day is as close as possible to the previous test day. So it does have some use. I always want my own test results to be as camparitive as possible without many outside variables. Also as far was calibration of the dyno. I also leave it alone. No major variable changes. Although it doesn't hurt to check the calibration atleast once a year. MD suggests more often than that. Its like anything else mechanical, it won't remain static forever.
Sweet whats your setup include?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2009 | 03:16 PM
  #55  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by Early EVO
Anxious to try a speed density setup on an 04 RS. Currently running E85 on a IX turbo. Been sort of maxed out at the power its making now. Want to do a real back to back test on the same day this winter so I can post up mass air versus SD results for my setup. My MD dyno has WCF too. But in the winter I prefer to only look at the actual numbers but I do use the weather station to tell me if my test day is as close as possible to the previous test day. So it does have some use. I always want my own test results to be as camparitive as possible without many outside variables. Also as far was calibration of the dyno. I also leave it alone. No major variable changes. Although it doesn't hurt to check the calibration atleast once a year. MD suggests more often than that. Its like anything else mechanical, it won't remain static forever.
Interesting points, however many people do not realize that WCF LOWERS whp when it is COLDER than 77*F so the uncorrected figure goes up during winter

When it all boils down to it, even similar model MD's have older or newer firmware and software revisions, there are 3, 4 and 5 roller units in production with different roll weights (more for additional rollers) and even two exact models with the same amount of rollers may differ.

In the end if the customer is happy, and the performance is consistent at the track, there are before and after numbers in most cases as a yardstick to support the gains, then that is what matters.

If the project white car is heavier than I thought, I apologize for the mistake Dave.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 05:17 AM
  #56  
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Mike@AwdMotorsports
I guess i was posting at the same time.. It happens..

I wont discuss the dyno any further as per mod request.. However I have spoken with RYU and i am confident Project white is heavier than his car..

Mike
Just to clear things up, from what I understand project white is somewhere in the neighborhood of 150Lbs heavier then my car. That margin would grow more if I had lighter forged internals.

Back on topic, good job DB. Looks like you've caught right back up with the stock ecu advancements in absolutely no time.

Last edited by RyuEvoIX; Oct 15, 2009 at 05:22 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:26 AM
  #57  
David Buschur's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
evo8ltw, your xml file is incorrect. I got to the bottom of it this morning. Just so you know. That table has no address in your xml.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #58  
EvoRalph's Avatar
Newbie
15 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 1
From: philly
awesome results with that setup and on SD!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 06:30 PM
  #59  
Early EVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 268
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
I understand the difference with the WCF. Most turbo people also understand that winter weather is best. We don't exactly test stuff when its 115 out here and get all excited with the results. But when its below 50 degrees and the weather station shows close to 1.0 I try to do all my testing then. Not like we will ever see a correction factor of less than one. I like the actual numbers that are produced. All other factors being equal, your MD dyno is calibrated with MDs setup computer. Doesn't matter if its a Euro or early MD500 with more rollers. i.e. an EVO X should make the same number on the same day on all of the MD500 models if there were setup for back to back to back testing. And yes from unit to unit, same model the roller weights are different. To balance the rollers requires weights a wee bit bigger than wheel weights. You see how they balance them at the factory?

When I do the speed density test and comparison. Will be all on the same winter day where the weather won't change more than 5 degrees from mid day till late night. Regardless of the numbers most of all just want the graphs to overlay. Looking for averages, not peaks.
One positive note out here is even though the temps change fairly drastically from summer to winter. Cars don't require drastic retuning to compensate.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 06:34 PM
  #60  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
evo8ltw, your xml file is incorrect. I got to the bottom of it this morning. Just so you know. That table has no address in your xml.
Are you sure? I just checked my XML and I see it in there:

<table name="Idle Stepper Lookup Table" address="43ab">

The table is under ISCV stuff rather than the Idle section. Here's a screenshot. Is this the table that you are talking about?

Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:24 AM.