570whp 23psi 3586
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Its not any worse than a stock stroke 2.0l. I dont think its unsafe but things dont last long strung out for extended periods of time. That said I am not afraid to rev it out though
Nice son. That's an S-ton of torque at 23 psi. What's with the dip at 5700 RPM, just an area that needs timing?
Can't wait for the E85 results. I will also need a ride.
Can't wait for the E85 results. I will also need a ride.
Thats sick power curve especially for the boost!
How much do you think the high compression motor helps with that? Is it true the about 10% in power and torque for every unit of compression?
How much do you think the high compression motor helps with that? Is it true the about 10% in power and torque for every unit of compression?
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Well its not going to ethanol tomorrow as planned. Instead I want to do 2 things first. We got our order of MAP sensors in so the dyno will log boost now, and that dyno sheet isnt really finished in my opinion. Peak power and torque are good and all but there are those dips that I notice (maybe no one else does, not sure) from low timing. Between the fact that I want a dynograph with attached boost and it has to go back on anyway, I am going to run one more tank of 92 through it first. It is only 115 miles old so its not gonna hurt anything by waiting.
Secondly I havent gotten any knock yet. The car has just continued to make power as I add timing to it (compared to 85mm 2.0L timing) over where it was. I take this as evidence I can keep going with the boost so in order to make it worth it strapping it down I am going to keep going up with the boost and see what happens. I am not sure how far its gonna go or if its already at the edge and I just dont know it yet. Based on what I have seen with my stock motor I think I can still keep feeding it boost (that one did run 32 at one point) despite the compression.
....Or I could be totally wrong. We'll see I guess.
Secondly I havent gotten any knock yet. The car has just continued to make power as I add timing to it (compared to 85mm 2.0L timing) over where it was. I take this as evidence I can keep going with the boost so in order to make it worth it strapping it down I am going to keep going up with the boost and see what happens. I am not sure how far its gonna go or if its already at the edge and I just dont know it yet. Based on what I have seen with my stock motor I think I can still keep feeding it boost (that one did run 32 at one point) despite the compression.
....Or I could be totally wrong. We'll see I guess.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I know this is a fluke, but it so happens that if you take my orginal 23psi number (496), multiply by it by the percentage of displacement increase (496 + 49.6=545.6) and then use the already extensively proven hot rod rule of 4% per full point (545.6*1.04=567.4) and you get pretty close to my number.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
5500- needs 1*
5750- needs 2*
6000- needs 1*
7250- needs 1*
That should smooth it and then I am going to add boost
Damn Aaron. Graph looks delicious, and looks like a 2.2 will be the way to go when my 2.3 craps out. Great numbers, regardless. If you get a chance to test on ethanol anytime soon, text me the dyno results, if you don't mind.







the Hcomp will really come into play when Aaron runs E98 tomorrow

