Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

just tuned with e85, fp red 80mm 460whp.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #1  
460hpevo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: south carolina,usa
just tuned with e85, fp red 80mm 460whp.



460hp, 450 tg. , dyno jet . inline walbro, intank walbro, 272 bc, 1200cc pte. 30psi greddy ebc profec. full boltons.os housing,tbe. turbo sx frontmount. hks bov. 18psi fp wastewaste. e85 fuel. new fp red 80mm surge compressor. full 30psi boost at 4000rpm. no spike or drop off. 15 degree advance timing. stock fuel rail. one fast ride. tuned at battlground in atlanta , georgia. easy 11 second 1/4 mile. should be in the 9s with fully build 2.3 engine & trans, clutches.

Last edited by Noize; Dec 8, 2009 at 07:43 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 09:41 AM
  #2  
ray3328's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,477
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY
This was at 30psi?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
460hpevo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: south carolina,usa
yes sir. 30psi. with arp head studs. air fuel ratio is right around 12. could go up 35psi and could be 500hp. but boost cut set at 32. and doesn't want to break the rod bolt. stock rod bolt on evo 8 is not safe over 450torgue.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 10:34 AM
  #4  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Rod bolts aren't what you have to worry about at 450 ft lbs, its folding the whole rod and ejecting it through the block. Safe limit in my experience is 410-425. I ran my car at 400 ft lbs for over 49k so I know thats safe. That was with stock rod bolts and frequent trips to 8500.

The thing I find interesting is we made 480 on the stock intake manifold and a MAF, and 500 with SD at the same boost level with about the same timing. Are the cams degreed or did you throw them in with stock gears. Also is the BC, buddy club or Brian Crower?

9's with that turbo is going to be a little tougher than just dropping a new motor in. Its going to have to have alot of weight out of it and pretty much max the turbo (560-570 on a DJ).
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #5  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Rod bolts aren't what you have to worry about at 450 ft lbs, its folding the whole rod and ejecting it through the block.
+1

I know from experience
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Rod bolts aren't what you have to worry about at 450 ft lbs, its folding the whole rod and ejecting it through the block. Safe limit in my experience is 410-425. I ran my car at 400 ft lbs for over 49k so I know thats safe. That was with stock rod bolts and frequent trips to 8500.
Have you tried using ECU based boost control to up the boost in thigher rpm ranges to maintain 400tq all the way to 8500? I am using an sc61 on my evo and have a spare 3port solenoid and was thinking that ramping the boost up as the efficiency of the motor goes down on the top end could end up giving a nice flat tq curve and linear power delivery. It is almost exactly the opposite of what 90% of the people experience with smaller turbos spiking to crazy tq #'s then dropping boost up top and a flat powerband with tq dropping like a rock. Theoretically holding only 400tq to 8K would give 600whp without a lot of stress on the motor. I have less aggressive HKS 272 cams and dont think going alot above 8K will be beneficial along with stock springs/retainers.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #7  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
This thread needs more dynosheet (it's a requirement)
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:17 AM
  #8  
460hpevo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: south carolina,usa
272s brian crower. stock timing gear. i think if i put adjustable gears and kelford 272s, might be another 20hp. Oh yeah, mine intake & exhaust manifold, throttle body are stock. Just had the works tb shaft seals in there.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:22 AM
  #9  
460hpevo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: south carolina,usa
to gst motorsport. got a dyno sheet , but not sure how to put in here. You can google it by type in e85 evo 8. my car and dyno sheet are in the battground motorsport website. It will be under " Battlground tuned e85 evo 8" . thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:38 AM
  #10  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by 460hpevo8
272s brian crower. stock timing gear. i think if i put adjustable gears and kelford 272s, might be another 20hp. Oh yeah, mine intake & exhaust manifold, throttle body are stock. Just had the works tb shaft seals in there.
I think you'll find the cams by themselves will be 20whp. The car I referenced was stock intake and exhaust at the time and a 65mm TB. We didnt do 100% back to back so I am not sure what the TB was worth but I would imagine 8-10whp.

To Batty-

Thats how we have always done our Hondas, both for traction and the sake of the sleeves. We are going to experiment with the 3 port and ECU boost for exactly that reason but customer stuff comes first before our own testing sometimes. Our test car must almost be your cars twin, it is an 05 with an SC61 and HKS272s on stock ECU SD.

The reason my car made 575whp reliably was I doing the same thing with boost more or less and keeping the torque as flat as possible. The power can only do one thing, ramp up past 5250.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 11:53 AM
  #11  
t3gr4's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: N.Va
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
This thread needs more dynosheet (it's a requirement)
i second that
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 02:14 PM
  #12  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Please PM me a link to that dynosheet hosted on the web, and I'll place it in your original post so you're within the forum guidelines. When I get the image, I'll unlock the thread.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 09:59 AM
  #13  
TakaseEVOIXSE's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: houston
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Rod bolts aren't what you have to worry about at 450 ft lbs, its folding the whole rod and ejecting it through the block. Safe limit in my experience is 410-425. I ran my car at 400 ft lbs for over 49k so I know thats safe. That was with stock rod bolts and frequent trips to 8500.
+10000!!! lol!

stock rod bolts stretched and caused issues for me at just 430ftlbs of torque (550-570whp). Spinning to 8500rpm didnt help either... i swapped to ARP rod bolts but by then i think the big ends were already untrue and shouldve been re-sized. End result... major rod knock. John Bradley is 100% CORRECT... dont go over low 400s in torque if you wanna stay stock block!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
josh_evo9
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
19
Dec 9, 2017 07:33 PM
003-EVO
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Mar 9, 2017 06:00 PM
eisnikesb
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
3
Dec 7, 2016 08:46 AM
CarbonKrazyEvo9
For Sale - Cars For Sale
0
Jun 19, 2015 10:10 PM
tscompusa
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
72
Apr 16, 2013 04:20 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 PM.