Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Dyno testing light weight rotors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:34 PM
  #1  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Dyno testing light weight rotors?

Quite a few of you have been following Shawna's Evo and the Tests we have been using it for. Last week she told me it was in need of brakes.

A while back we opened an account with Baer while they were still selling their two piece Evo rotors (two years ago). When we did that we purchased what we were told was the last of them. While I knew that's what I wanted to use for this project, they were simply not available any more. Long story short a quick phone call to Baer got us a few sets of rotors at our door a couple days later. They never put them back into production but "found" a few more rotors and decided to make hats for them.

Today we decided to test them, just as David did before. I remember a bunch of people not believing his tests before so we decided to do it again! This is what we found.


We strapped the car down and did a pull with the stock rotors: 313 TQ / 327 HP

Then actually jacked the car up ON THE DYNO and changed the rotors and ended up at 339 HP / 319 TQ. That's +12 HP and +7 TQ.

Weight:
Baer Front Rotor: 15.8 vs stock 17.75 = 1.95 each
Baer Rear Rotor: 11.75 vs stock 14.45 = 2.70 each

9.3 pounds of rotational weight savings going from a half worn set of stock rotors to these.





Changing the rotors right on the dyno:


Stock Fronts:


New Front Baer's:



Stock Rear's:


New Rear Baer's:







Last edited by EmeryatSTM; Mar 30, 2010 at 11:38 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2010 | 11:53 PM
  #2  
_des_'s Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (57)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 394
Likes: 4
From: Mobile AL
Wow em, just wow, Some serious testing!

I honestly never thought about rotors being less rotational mass, but that makes perfect sense lol
Its weird but it works.

Last edited by _des_; Mar 30, 2010 at 11:56 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 12:01 AM
  #3  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Im blown away, I never would have thought so little change in weight would result in that much noticeable power!

That would mean the same applies for wheels and tires yes?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 12:31 AM
  #4  
K1tt3n5's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Dallas!!
Wow I never would of that that actually made power! Would you say the same would apply for light wheel/ tire combinations? Similar gains anyway.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 12:45 AM
  #5  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
Originally Posted by K1tt3n5
Wow I never would of that that actually made power! Would you say the same would apply for light wheel/ tire combinations? Similar gains anyway.

It should apply the same way.


-Em
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #6  
Evokid03's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (100)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
So you can not buy these rotors? Im in need of rotors two and would like to lose some rotational mass in my car. Any suggestions ?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 02:05 AM
  #7  
K1tt3n5's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Dallas!!
Originally Posted by EmeryatSTM
It should apply the same way.


-Em
Good to know, thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 04:27 AM
  #8  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
do you guys sell the baers? I know they have become difficult to find.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:45 AM
  #9  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Very interesting!
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 06:25 AM
  #10  
Murf's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 851
Likes: 1
From: Reno,NV
I have these rotors. I was wondering what I was going to do when it was time to get new friction surfaces. Any Input on that or the people with them screwed?
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 06:58 AM
  #11  
warp9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
From: Near the hOle
Would love to see the HP difference with the AMS drag kit. Hey Em, whats the weight diff. between the Brake Man and AMS drag brakes?

Last edited by warp9; Mar 31, 2010 at 07:10 AM. Reason: added question
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 08:04 AM
  #12  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
I have three more sets of these rotors in stock.


Baer has friction surfaces left over but wont be getting any more.


The brake mans are quite a bit lighter than the AMS fronts. The rears I'm not sure about.


-Em
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 08:33 AM
  #13  
JRivera's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Awesome test Em! I'm sure you guys are happy with this.


-Justin
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 08:34 AM
  #14  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by K1tt3n5
Wow I never would of that that actually made power! Would you say the same would apply for light wheel/ tire combinations? Similar gains anyway.
As a rule of thumb, the farther it is from the hub, the more difference it makes. So in terms of impact tires are first, followed by wheels, then the rotors. Herein lies the irony in folks installing very aggressive wheel/tire combos, hoping to make their cars look faster, when they're actually making the cars run slower.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 08:43 AM
  #15  
Gordian79's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
From: Rockland
Nice results.But why would you test/sell something that's not readily available.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:33 AM.