DeMoNz

iTrader: (17)

Update 3: New setup:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...hp-330wtq.html

Update 2:
Tuned on the same dynapack that made 260whp/267wtq on a hotter day earlier. the dynojet on a colder day made 308whp/282wtq

baseline 280whp/277wtq (around 20°C, 68° fahrenheit)
final numbers 327whp/310wtq tuned 94 octane on CobbAP. peak boost 20.5psi, taper to 18psi@7400rpm Maxed out Wastegate duty cycle

New Tuned dyno sheet:



Update 1
2 different dynosheets

308whp on a dynojet (roller dyno)on a cold day(around 15°C, 39° fahrenheit)
260whp on a dynapack (hub dyno) on a hotter day(25°C, 77° fahrenheit)

Mods
Megan o2 housing
some JDM no-name 3" downpipe
Megan Resonated Testpipe
HKS Hi-Power Catback
HKS RS intake
AMS lower intercooler piping
Injen UICP
Walboro 255 fuel pump
ACT 2900 clutch w/ RRE 10.7lb Lightweight Steel Flywheel
New Transfer case at 50k miles (the old owner must of done crazy 6k clutch dumps)
Cobb Tuning Stage 2 93 Octane fuel map w/ restrictor pill removed
Running 94 Octane


308whp/282wtq on a Dynojet cold day


260whp/267wtq on a dynapack hot day

FJF

iTrader: (18)

What's wrong with the stock suspension? If you do decide to replace it, do yourself a favor and look into it in detail.

You should be able to see better numbers with a custom tune. Good luck.

BEISSEN

iTrader: (31)

WOW!!! Thats insanely low compaired to most IX's I see get tuned but then again you dont have cams.

DeMoNz

iTrader: (17)

yes i know numbers are pretty low, but remeber i am on a BASE FLASH from cobb tuning. not a custom tune.

DeMoNz

iTrader: (17)

i made 260whp / 267wtq on a Dynapack on a hotter day.
i thought hub dynos will give higher numbers than rollers...i guess not

RSMike

iTrader: (1)

what gear did you do it in?

gear ratio should be closer to 4.5 - 4.8, so thats why it's reading low

HaVoC187

iTrader: (4)

How much whp does a stock IX MR make on a dynojet?

JDavenport

iTrader: (33)

You have 94 oct? Get a Hallman MBC and a custom tune for 25-26 psi (try Mellon). You are leaving 30-40 whp and tq on the table. And the stock suspension is fine for that level.

And as FJF said above, do some research before you just start buying suspension parts. Lot of crappy 'bargain' coilovers floating around.

DeMoNz

iTrader: (17)

it was done on 5th gear i believe...


there are always inconsistent temperatures where im from. id rather have the boost controlled through the ECU than use a MBC.

DeMoNz

iTrader: (17)

sorry i never dynoed it stock. i would think it would be in the range of 250-260whp on a dynojet

JDavenport

iTrader: (33)

Uh, whatever. Just went for a drive, 99 today here and we see as much as -10 in the winter. The Hallman never varies. I've never touched it since Mellon and i set it when he tuned it.

So, I don't understand you point here.

L888Apex

iTrader: (94)

my friend was making 430whp/520wtq on stock suspension LOL

Brandon03Evo

iTrader: (1)

i am on stock suspension with 550 whp 470 tq LOL....i raced it last night...

DeMoNz

iTrader: (17)

in the summer when its warm, it might not be hitting the boost you want. so you might want to raise it a little bit

if it gets cold and you dont lower it, you might get some boost spikes.

id rather just have the ECU control the boost than a MBC, just personal preference i think

mifesto

iTrader: (58)

user's experience with MBC can vary on weather but also which vacuum source you tap from (off the turbo or bov)... cannot argue that its more or less consistent then ecu controlled boost without such details