Ricer goes back on the dyno with 6765!
if i may compare the 2....
44psi - 708hp for 6765
40psi - 680hp for 6262.
so 4 more psi on a 67mm over the 62, and only ~30hp gain?
even more notably, you lose a bunch of tq switching to the 67mm
peak tq for the 6765 is 510@6800
peak tq for the 6262 is 575@5800
im interested in seeing your ET and traps to see how it all comes to play tho. i have a 6262 and was looking at possibly upgrading to a 67mm (albeit either a 6765 or BW S400SX) next season, so seeing comparisons like this is great.
did you ever try the 6262 at the matching 44psi of the 6765?
i appreciate you sharing your experience with the car.
edit: i forgot to take notice that both dynos werent revved out the same. the 6262 cut short @ 7500. looks like from 8-9k the 6765 would really start shining hp and tq wise.
Last edited by norcalSRTrida; Jun 11, 2010 at 01:03 AM.
Here is a pretty accurate overlay between the 6262 to the 6765. It may not be 'exact', since the axes had to be eyeballed since they are different between the two runs. The 6262 was overlayed on the 6765 graph.





