Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Ricer goes back on the dyno with 6765!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 12:35 AM
  #31  
norcalSRTrida's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: pleasanton, ca
Originally Posted by EmeryatSTM
Yes we did. Big difference is not in peak numbers. Its that it holds the power all the way to 9k plus now which is where it is needed.


-Em



if i may compare the 2....

44psi - 708hp for 6765

40psi - 680hp for 6262.


so 4 more psi on a 67mm over the 62, and only ~30hp gain?

even more notably, you lose a bunch of tq switching to the 67mm

peak tq for the 6765 is 510@6800

peak tq for the 6262 is 575@5800



im interested in seeing your ET and traps to see how it all comes to play tho. i have a 6262 and was looking at possibly upgrading to a 67mm (albeit either a 6765 or BW S400SX) next season, so seeing comparisons like this is great.

did you ever try the 6262 at the matching 44psi of the 6765?


i appreciate you sharing your experience with the car.




edit: i forgot to take notice that both dynos werent revved out the same. the 6262 cut short @ 7500. looks like from 8-9k the 6765 would really start shining hp and tq wise.

Last edited by norcalSRTrida; Jun 11, 2010 at 01:03 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 01:01 AM
  #32  
norcalSRTrida's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: pleasanton, ca
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
overlay please! amazing numbers


my own artist rendition for educational purposes.

Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 01:04 AM
  #33  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
wheres the old sheet at norcalSRTrida
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 01:09 AM
  #34  
norcalSRTrida's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: pleasanton, ca
Originally Posted by tscompusa
wheres the old sheet at norcalSRTrida
posted in the link a few posts up.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 01:16 AM
  #35  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
sorry im blind i guess - im going to overlay the 2 now in photoshop give me a minute.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 01:20 AM
  #36  
tscompusa2's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,375
Likes: 10
From: pa
here you go man.


the HP isnt accurate since its the old 6262 in background, but you get the idea of differences sort of.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 06:43 AM
  #37  
iicemanr6's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Geneva, NY
sweet numbers, wish i was going to the track tonight to watch the ricer rip off some 8's
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 06:45 AM
  #38  
Jrod@Buschur's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (101)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,487
Likes: 1
From: York, PA
GET IT DONE!


Best of luck Emery, Shawna and the rest of the STM crew.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 07:00 AM
  #39  
SparkTech's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (141)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: florida
The power is definitely there for 8's.

Excellent results, good luck at the track.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #40  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by tscompusa
here you go man.


the HP isnt accurate since its the old 6262 in background, but you get the idea of differences sort of.
That overlay isn't accurate. You didn't match the RPM axis. : )

I can make an overlay if you guys want.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 09:03 AM
  #41  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Here is a pretty accurate overlay between the 6262 to the 6765. It may not be 'exact', since the axes had to be eyeballed since they are different between the two runs. The 6262 was overlayed on the 6765 graph.

Attached Thumbnails Ricer goes back on the dyno with 6765!-6765-6262.jpg  
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 09:38 AM
  #42  
EmeryatSTM's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (79)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,340
Likes: 5
From: Rochester, NY
^^ Thank you. That tells the story a lot better.

-Em
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 11:55 AM
  #43  
PATRICK B.'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,561
Likes: 1
From: CALIFORNIA
Originally Posted by EmeryatSTM
^^ Thank you. That tells the story a lot better.

-Em
What are you doing typing you should be strapped in tight to that land rocket right now
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 12:00 PM
  #44  
3gEclipseTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
From: ma
Is it set to kill mode? Didnt AWD hit 921whp @44psi, 700whp seems kinda low.
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #45  
red03evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax
Originally Posted by 3gEclipseTurbo
Is it set to kill mode? Didnt AWD hit 921whp @44psi, 700whp seems kinda low.
I think you are comparing two different dynos. I believe AWD motorsports has a dynojet and STM has a mustang dyno. I don't think they would read the same.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:45 PM.