Most Hated

iTrader: (3)

Got the car finished thrusday night. drove right to the dyno.
Things to note:
Stock intake manifold. throttle body.
unknown Front mount. 3inch core. (had a leak problem with my ETS)
Stock lower coldside pipe. with stock route upper.
SINGLE walboro. stock fuel lines. fuel rail. FPR.

Car put down 522hp at only 25psi. on pump gas. car was making more but there was a boost leak that we couldnt find (it was 3am). we were having problems with the TRU-boost. so we put in a MBC. there is still plenty left in the walboro for more.

im going to go over everything. get a Buschur FMIC with shorter piping. clean up everything up. turn it up on pump. than go with c16.

cumminsracer14

iTrader: (6)

Thats a lot of power on pump with stock parts.

mrdevo

iTrader: (4)

Hmm with power still climbing at 8000rpms. I'd love to believe there was nothing fudging the numbers. Something we are missing?

atkins

iTrader: (13)

Cf???

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

Hmmm. FPBlack comparison on our dyno-

I have done 490 at 29 on pump, but that was with a V5, S2s, built 2.0 motor, etc. We did 525@28psi on 92 octane with all the same mods on a built 2.4 as well. Knowing what it took to make 613@25psi on Mikey's E85 2.4 monster I really have to find it hard to believe this was legit on the operators end of the dyno session. What does a bone stock Evo, with the same correction factor your car used, make on this dyno?

aaron

Evoryder

iTrader: (55)

Another interesting dyno plot. 522 @ 25psi...a bunch of stock pipes/no porting. and a boost leak lol ..amazing. I would love to see this car on a dynojet. I'm thinking this car is at least 80whp higher than it really is.

Most Hated

iTrader: (3)

i dont know the correction factor. i would like to know how the dyno reads also. just still impressive that there is alot left. even if this dyno is super high reading.
motor is a built 2.0 10:1 compression. buschur stage 3+ head. tomei 280's. buschur ported exhaust mani and a ported black.

RSMike

iTrader: (1)

it's probably 1.2 CF

CMB

iTrader: (5)

Yea ok...I bet if I put my 10 speed on that dyno it will make 90 hp.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

LOL @ this. 522 on this type of dyno with standard cf is not even possible with 92-93oct since these dynos read lower then even mustang dynos. im guessing the CF is so high that its a joke. It must be D* M***** (censored because the place isn't even worth mentioning.)

Even dynojet CF, 522 @ 25psi with that kind of torque curve? i call bull**** 100%. nice try but it wont work on this forum, we are not idiots.

I'm willing to bet this car will barely make 400whp on a dynojet as it sits @ 25psi.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

Take it to Iveytune, if it dynos over 500 ill pay for your dyno fees. ill even let you fix the boost leak first

dsmfan95

iTrader: (27)

Was this only 25psi across the entire pull? The hp/tq curves almost suggest that boost was creeping.

tscompusa2

iTrader: (22)

you cant run a fp black and keep it at 25psi.. of course its going to creep. the turbo is to big when put in its efficiency range to maintain low boost like that. maybe if you barely preload the internal wg the flapper will open early and somewhat control it better, but thats the only way in stock form. Im pretty sure this was done at D* so thats why i offered what i just did.. id like to see how much jacked their CF really is right now

seriously if you cant tune cars then close the ****ing shop. anyone that has to raise CF to make more power cant tune for ****.

JohnBradley

iTrader: (30)

If it was creeping bad out the top I can believe the power and powerband. It would look something like this-



23 or 24 for most of the pull and then creeps to 29 by redline. Powerband looks somewhat similar. This was a 9.5:1 motor as I recall.

aaron

Most Hated

iTrader: (3)

its a 1.2 CF on this dyno.

i dont know what shop you are referring too. PM me if you have problem though im curious.
im clearly not representing anyone or promoting anyones work. this was done privately.