Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAP's Evo 8 & 9 Exhaust Manifold Testing / Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #31  
aggieEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 8
From: Rockwall, TX
Great numbers!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 01:37 PM
  #32  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
Thanks!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 03:22 PM
  #33  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by 4xforce
Do tell! Subscribed

California Special per your request PM me for pricing haven't quite ironed it out yet.



Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 05:29 PM
  #34  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
thank you for testing and sharing. Great results, nice test.

I think I might have to make myself a turbo manifold now.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 05:38 PM
  #35  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
Originally Posted by R/TErnie
thank you for testing and sharing. Great results, nice test.

I think I might have to make myself a turbo manifold now.
Or you can just pick up one of ours, I'll hook you up.

-Adam
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 05:43 PM
  #36  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
California Special looks stealthy!!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 05:58 PM
  #37  
RevMoto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 1
From: Boca Raton
Hate to be that guy but it is funny how everyone else in the past that has tested the megan style manifold has lost spool and midrange which completely negated the minor peak gains of that style manifold but when you guys test it you lose nothing and gain 20+whp. Even your long runner manifold gained spool and midrange. Very skeptical about your testing.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 06:15 PM
  #38  
MN_Evolution's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by RevMoto
Hate to be that guy but it is funny how everyone else in the past that has tested the megan style manifold has lost spool and midrange which completely negated the minor peak gains of that style manifold but when you guys test it you lose nothing and gain 20+whp. Even your long runner manifold gained spool and midrange. Very skeptical about your testing.
Doesn't appear that they tested a Megan style manifold.

And I was there the whole time monitoring. I was careful with observing the testing considering it was my car. As far as the spool goes it's quite late on my car to begin with. Seeing that it is a 2.0 w/ ported head and giant cams.

Maybe it's also the reason the Megan cost's $200 and this costs $900?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 06:15 PM
  #39  
deylag's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 148
From: Milpitas, CA
I am thinking about which manifold would be best with BBK-full turbo running on
E-85. I think I should consider the short runner versus the ported one.

I mainly autocross with my Evo and will occasionally take it to the track, so maybe I should just port my stock manifold.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 06:53 PM
  #40  
RevMoto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 1
From: Boca Raton
Originally Posted by MN_Evolution
Doesn't appear that they tested a Megan style manifold.

And I was there the whole time monitoring. I was careful with observing the testing considering it was my car. As far as the spool goes it's quite late on my car to begin with. Seeing that it is a 2.0 w/ ported head and giant cams.

Maybe it's also the reason the Megan cost's $200 and this costs $900?
The "Map Short Runner" manifold is definitely a megan replica as all others are megan replicas. Nothing about that manifold has changed since Marco from Billet design fab'd it up back in 03. Their is always a give and take in manifold designs yet any thread I ever see you guys dyoing parts you never see the "give." This is why manufacturer testing is completely biased and can't be accounted for. Also if MAP really did fabricate these then why would an American company design a manifold with anti-lag ports on the manifold that are only found on jdm and euro style evo's. Come on now open your eyes.

Last edited by RevMoto; Mar 14, 2011 at 06:57 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 09:18 PM
  #41  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by RevMoto
The "Map Short Runner" manifold is definitely a megan replica as all others are megan replicas. Nothing about that manifold has changed since Marco from Billet design fab'd it up back in 03. Their is always a give and take in manifold designs yet any thread I ever see you guys dyoing parts you never see the "give." This is why manufacturer testing is completely biased and can't be accounted for. Also if MAP really did fabricate these then why would an American company design a manifold with anti-lag ports on the manifold that are only found on jdm and euro style evo's. Come on now open your eyes.
You are incorrect in comparing this manifold to the megan racing unit, but it is similar to others on the market (titek, gt spec). Also, the short runner manifold is not made in house, we never claimed it to be ;-) Believe what you want, we have seen similar results from the short runner manifold on two cars now. Im confident any third party testing in the future will back this up.

Additionally, you can see boost and AFRs. All the runs were done same day, what are your doubts about our testing?

Last edited by ChrisCarey; Mar 14, 2011 at 09:23 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 10:12 PM
  #42  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
^Can't please everyone Chris, there will always be people that doubt.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2011 | 10:34 PM
  #43  
RunRunRun's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
The "give" is the "not outrageous gains up top" correct? The "take" is midrange power gains. The testing seems sound to me and no claims were made that are false. Geat job MAP! Thank you for the info!
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #44  
silverevo05's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 798
Likes: 9
From: So CAL
Interested in the Cali special

Can we get some outside test done to put this argument to rest???
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011 | 09:34 AM
  #45  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Cali special is priced at $649.99 shipped guys

http://www.maperformance.com/map-sho...ap-evo-em.html
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:47 PM.