8.8 sec I run 2 years ago with 100mm crank. This year I use 94mm crank. I could run 9.3 sec with 93RON and 8.9 with Q16 and big problem with launch: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV28Y...&feature=feedu

The power in HP.

 

awesome power the car is really moving out

 

Any reason why when you went to a 94MM Crank vs the 100?

 

let me count the ways.

That's 1023 DJ whp according to my calcs.

If you figure how to get out of the hole... incredible times! Your car moooves.

 

Nice power.

You just need to match up the scaling on the hp and tq on the Y axis. Make both max and min numbers for HP and TQ the same.

-Jalal

 

I wanted more power at high RPM, improve trap speed, but I lost torque at the middle range. My launch became unstable and engine's life is much shorter than with 100mm crank. Next year I will bit my 100mm crank time and the aim is about 8.5 sec))). Now I got good torque curve and hope to get success. It was too difficult)))