Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

EVO7 GT45R Q16 Ukraine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 08:09 AM
  #1  
FILIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Ukraine, Kiev
EVO7 GT45R Q16 Ukraine

A few days ago I tuned my drag EVO7. Mustang dyno.

3 bar pull:


3.2 bar:


Some video in bad quality:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvvG2lw7AM8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6liKk9r2ILw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aHc9cVOa1Rc

The car is used only for drag.

4G64 block
custom head porting
custom header with GT45R in compact housings
custom intake with Q45TB
own dry sump system instead of AMS crap
Vi-pec V88 ECU with M&W drag pro CDI
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 11:55 AM
  #2  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
What the hell? Why did you setup the graph like that?

Tq and hp should intersect at 5250 rpm. 700 TQ on a MD on a 2.1 or whatever you using seems a lot for a GT45R. That doesn't seem right at all.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 12:06 PM
  #3  
S13 Curtis's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: Orlando,FL
Originally Posted by project_skyline
What the hell? Why did you setup the graph like that?

Tq and hp should intersect at 5250 rpm. 700 TQ on a MD on a 2.1 or whatever you using seems a lot for a GT45R. That doesn't seem right at all.
I was thinking the same. But either way it put down good numbers.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
evosam726's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 658
Likes: 1
From: IL
yeah talk about 700 tq! wtf. but good numbers sounds great! hope my car sounds like that lol one day
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #5  
FILIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Ukraine, Kiev
Originally Posted by project_skyline
What the hell? Why did you setup the graph like that?

Tq and hp should intersect at 5250 rpm. 700 TQ on a MD on a 2.1 or whatever you using seems a lot for a GT45R. That doesn't seem right at all.
I think its because we ( in Europe) use metric system instead of your. My TQ is measured in Nm and you use ft-lbs.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 03:13 PM
  #6  
Blue91lx's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 5
From: Philadelphia, PA
I wonder what it would spool at if you started the pull a bit earlier.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #7  
FILIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Ukraine, Kiev
I think, we would not have any changes. I forgot to mention that dyno Load was 95%)))
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 03:32 PM
  #8  
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: KSA
Wow that a good numbers ,,, did you rev the engine to 10000rpm ? Or what
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2011 | 05:48 PM
  #9  
awdturbo8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From: Rochester,NY
Sickkk numbers. 700tq!!!
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 10:43 AM
  #10  
FILIN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Ukraine, Kiev
Originally Posted by EVO(boss)
Wow that a good numbers ,,, did you rev the engine to 10000rpm ? Or what
Only during the run at 1 gear. The power does not rise. After 9500 it slow goes down.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 05:57 PM
  #11  
akauf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: New Holland, Pa
its 520lb/ft of torque. It might not be imperial hp either but they're close to the same anyhow.

Either way 8.8 @ 163mph is no joke! Congrats!
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 07:41 PM
  #12  
project_skyline's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,532
Likes: 1
From: Colorado
Originally Posted by FILIN
I think its because we ( in Europe) use metric system instead of your. My TQ is measured in Nm and you use ft-lbs.
Oh ok. Interesting, is that power in kilowatts?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 08:10 PM
  #13  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
I was thinking that 888whp on nearly 50psi on Q16 with a motor like this might be a bit light, if thats kw - WOW.... very very nice work. That's going to haul!!! I'm guessing this could be the car that did high 8s in the video versus a certain Ukraine Skyline, possibly runs an STM Ghost shifter?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 09:12 PM
  #14  
n2oiroc's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,180
Likes: 5
From: milwaukee, wi
so is it a 4g64 block with a 100mm crank?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2011 | 10:58 PM
  #15  
akauf's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: New Holland, Pa
well looking at the second graph...

707nm * .7376 = 521.4832 FT-LB

hp=(ft-lb*rpm)/5252

(521.4832x9141)/5252= 907.63

so that's hp as we know it fwiw
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM.