tscompusa

iTrader: (31)

i guess ill be the first to say that's not possible with hks 272 on a stock 8 turbo.. 10.5 hotside or not.

can you email me your log so i can put it into virtual dyno and play with it? something looks way off with that graph..

i bet with smoothing 10 it drops under 400whp in vd. email me log with tps, rpm, tscompusa@gmail.com -- unless you don't care about advertising highly inflated numbers.. then i guess don't.

evo8john

iTrader: (1)

Hallman mbc that is about 1 turn from bottomed out is how. I dont expect the turbo to last long at this level... but at 150 bucks, who cares lol. I dont see why this is so hard for some of you to believe. Isnt the record for an 8 turbo over 460whp?

evo8john

iTrader: (1)

I will send you the log tonight tom. I dont really care what the numbers are. Just thought i would share what popped up.

tscompusa

iTrader: (31)

no problem i understand. sounds good ill look for them. i will share what it shows in vd also if you don't mind in your thread.

just email me your tire diameter, the vehicles weight with you in it, gearbox data / car model etc when you send me the log. also make sure the left data on the log remains in tact ( LogID LogEntryDate LogEntryTime LogEntrySeconds)

evo8john

iTrader: (1)

Ya i will include all that. I really dont want to mislead anyone here. I have never had the valvecover off the car to check what cams it has for sure, but i assumed by how they sounded and the mild topend they were the hks cams. If it becomes a big deal i will pull the cover and look. I am sure it has the bone stock 10.5 hotside 8 turbo though and will get pics of everything if need be.

RazorLab

iTrader: (8)

That should trap at least 120 full weight at that "power"

murlo26

iTrader: (9)

Saying "stock" head always makes me wonder why people say that if they have cams. I am guessing people just mean porting but really different cams should classify a head as not stock...same with bottom end being not stock when it has new rods/pistons.

getsideways

iTrader: (18)

I agree with what Tom said, Sorry John its just your number is about 40-60WHP higher then it 'should' be, And Virtual Dynos can be tricky to play with, Im not sure how accurate the one is in Evoscan.

evo8john

iTrader: (1)

Well the number as i see it, is high mainly due to a big spike and the afr being about 12.5 at that point. The rest of the powerband looks fairly normal as far as i can tell and without the spike would probably be in the 390 to 400 whp range. Does this seem more accurate for everyone?

YZ86

amazing numbers!!

steveyrich

iTrader: (21)

In to see the vd graph. That's a hell of a boost profile, I'm sure the car feels good regardless.

svt_lightning01

iTrader: (1)

i would say its definitely possible to make those numbers if the car is in great running shape and is a freak. I trapped 121 with hks280 on the 10.5 8 turbo with a stock o2 housing and a weight of 3250 with me inside. To be honest i shifted slow so that could be higher so i would say an aggressively modded car could make that power because mine is nothing special.

svt_lightning01

iTrader: (1)

almost forgot... E85 FTW! haha

Benja

I would believe the boost curve if it was a 3-port.
I have no dramas holding 24.5psi+ to 7k with a 9.8rear, stock 02 stock cams.

evo8john

iTrader: (1)

Im using a hallman mbc that is almost bottomed out. Thats how im making/holding this boost level