Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

tscomptuned BBK Full: Virtual Dyno vs Dynojet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2012 | 10:10 AM
  #16  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
good comparo Blitz! nice numbers on pump with the Full. hopefully i'll get mine there soon.
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 12:11 PM
  #17  
Blitz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 3
From: Earth
Originally Posted by vmrevo9
good comparo Blitz! nice numbers on pump with the Full. hopefully i'll get mine there soon.
You mean you ran 11.79 with less?
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 03:43 PM
  #18  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
i VD chart shows 401hp/369 tq @26psi



this was with slight knock counts throughout the run.

and it slightly peaked at 26psi at the track
Reply
Old May 5, 2012 | 12:57 AM
  #19  
Blitz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 3
From: Earth
Originally Posted by vmrevo9
i VD chart shows 401hp/369 tq @26psi



this was with slight knock counts throughout the run.

and it slightly peaked at 26psi at the track
Wow nice driving!
Reply
Old May 5, 2012 | 01:58 AM
  #20  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
well my new tires made a big difference. they are nothing special they are just regular street tires but they provided much improved grip over my old worn out tires

hopefully i can get kicked off the track next time out
Reply
Old May 5, 2012 | 04:08 AM
  #21  
mxguy1286's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: pa
Originally Posted by 5LEEPERISAH23I
VD FTW! all the VD hater argue with that bahaha. if u have the correct weight n are on a flat road its going to be dead on end of story

Oh yeah cause its always 100% dead on all the time.... Glad to see you didnt see it in person when it was no where near close before.....Its a hit or miss program. Some cars it may be close others well its just not even.

O.p. Glad to see you made the numbers you expected. Always a wieght lifted off the shoulders when it makes what you hoped for!
Reply
Old May 5, 2012 | 03:39 PM
  #22  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
i did try to match the numbers i received later and posted the info here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/10...-post1382.html

i dont really agree its a hit or miss program based on what ive been seeing when its used properly on my personal evo.. after i took my car on route 30 and did pulls my numbers have drastically gotten lower.. if i had done this from the beginning i wouldn't have been that far off at all on my numbers.

its safe to say you can easily inflate the numbers if you aren't careful though or not paying attention or just not using a smooth or flat enough road in general. that doesnt make it a hit or miss program in my book though.

not to mention 540whp i have logs when my car was at the track trapping 131's and 540 is right on target for that trap speed and my race weight. (3350lbs)
Reply
Old May 5, 2012 | 05:50 PM
  #23  
Boltz.'s Avatar
Evolved Member
FCOTM Winner
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
From: St. Charles, IL
Originally Posted by bbarnhill
You have really lost your mind haven't you? Its only good for peak power? If anything a dyno is NOT for showing this. It does show the dips in power where it should. So I have to disagree with pretty much everything you said. I think you have had a bad experience with 'Virtual Dynos' but not Virtual Dyno. You used the one built into evoscan, which has been known to be crap. Oh but it should get better since he decompiled my app and stole my code for the new version.
Easy,

Not trying to knock your product with my previous statement. I am spoiled and get to spend a lot of time on the dyno so my opinions are biased, a virtual dyno just isn't the same. It serves its place in the market given it is a infinitely cheaper option than investing in a dyno. Kudos for making a good product.
Reply
Old May 6, 2012 | 01:50 AM
  #24  
nobudgettuning's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: bayarea
good job Tom
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #25  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
You made more power on the BBK Full on 93-octane than I did with the EF4 on 91-octane.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2012 | 05:52 PM
  #26  
boostedwrx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Looks good - the bbk is a good effin pump gas turbo. Nice comparo too
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 04:54 PM
  #27  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
just throwing this out there so others can see.



This is the exact same VD graph posted in the first post but with higher smoothing. vd reads lower when smoothed high with a legit graph.

Last edited by tscompusa; Apr 16, 2013 at 07:27 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2013 | 06:02 PM
  #28  
Silvermike's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: Trinidad
the peak tq always takes a hit in the VD cuz of the smoothing factor applied....

what it needs is 2 factors.... one for pre-spool, one for full boost... and an adjustable cross over point for these values to account for different turbos.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #29  
5LEEPERISAH23I's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 1
From: Malvern, PA
My favorite part about this post is you dont see any of the VD Haters posting fighting about how that number is off.

VD has been dead on to me "i think" My VD numbers always match my 1/4 Traps they should go.

550whp i went 129-130 mph
630whp i went 133.6 mph

that is pretty much dead on full weight and street tires "not to mention shifting in 5th" i think that hurts your MPH some say it doesnt, good thing is we will find out in less then month of that is true or not. Just put 4.11's in there with the same setup as the 133.6mph so we will we if i gain MPH.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2013 | 08:53 AM
  #30  
hachansoo0413's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: WI
great comparison!!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.