tscomptuned BBK Full: Virtual Dyno vs Dynojet
well my new tires made a big difference. they are nothing special they are just regular street tires but they provided much improved grip over my old worn out tires
hopefully i can get kicked off the track next time out
hopefully i can get kicked off the track next time out
Oh yeah cause its always 100% dead on all the time....
Glad to see you didnt see it in person when it was no where near close before.....Its a hit or miss program. Some cars it may be close others well its just not even.O.p. Glad to see you made the numbers you expected. Always a wieght lifted off the shoulders when it makes what you hoped for!
i did try to match the numbers i received later and posted the info here: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/10...-post1382.html
i dont really agree its a hit or miss program based on what ive been seeing when its used properly on my personal evo.. after i took my car on route 30 and did pulls my numbers have drastically gotten lower.. if i had done this from the beginning i wouldn't have been that far off at all on my numbers.
its safe to say you can easily inflate the numbers if you aren't careful though or not paying attention or just not using a smooth or flat enough road in general. that doesnt make it a hit or miss program in my book though.
not to mention 540whp i have logs when my car was at the track trapping 131's and 540 is right on target for that trap speed and my race weight. (3350lbs)
i dont really agree its a hit or miss program based on what ive been seeing when its used properly on my personal evo.. after i took my car on route 30 and did pulls my numbers have drastically gotten lower.. if i had done this from the beginning i wouldn't have been that far off at all on my numbers.
its safe to say you can easily inflate the numbers if you aren't careful though or not paying attention or just not using a smooth or flat enough road in general. that doesnt make it a hit or miss program in my book though.
not to mention 540whp i have logs when my car was at the track trapping 131's and 540 is right on target for that trap speed and my race weight. (3350lbs)
You have really lost your mind haven't you?
Its only good for peak power? If anything a dyno is NOT for showing this. It does show the dips in power where it should. So I have to disagree with pretty much everything you said. I think you have had a bad experience with 'Virtual Dynos' but not Virtual Dyno. You used the one built into evoscan, which has been known to be crap. Oh but it should get better since he decompiled my app and stole my code for the new version.
Its only good for peak power? If anything a dyno is NOT for showing this. It does show the dips in power where it should. So I have to disagree with pretty much everything you said. I think you have had a bad experience with 'Virtual Dynos' but not Virtual Dyno. You used the one built into evoscan, which has been known to be crap. Oh but it should get better since he decompiled my app and stole my code for the new version.
Not trying to knock your product with my previous statement. I am spoiled and get to spend a lot of time on the dyno so my opinions are biased, a virtual dyno just isn't the same. It serves its place in the market given it is a infinitely cheaper option than investing in a dyno. Kudos for making a good product.
just throwing this out there so others can see.

This is the exact same VD graph posted in the first post but with higher smoothing. vd reads lower when smoothed high with a legit graph.

This is the exact same VD graph posted in the first post but with higher smoothing. vd reads lower when smoothed high with a legit graph.
Last edited by tscompusa; Apr 16, 2013 at 07:27 PM.
the peak tq always takes a hit in the VD cuz of the smoothing factor applied....
what it needs is 2 factors.... one for pre-spool, one for full boost... and an adjustable cross over point for these values to account for different turbos.
what it needs is 2 factors.... one for pre-spool, one for full boost... and an adjustable cross over point for these values to account for different turbos.
My favorite part about this post is you dont see any of the VD Haters posting fighting about how that number is off.
VD has been dead on to me "i think" My VD numbers always match my 1/4 Traps they should go.
550whp i went 129-130 mph
630whp i went 133.6 mph
that is pretty much dead on full weight and street tires "not to mention shifting in 5th" i think that hurts your MPH some say it doesnt, good thing is we will find out in less then month of that is true or not. Just put 4.11's in there with the same setup as the 133.6mph so we will we if i gain MPH.
VD has been dead on to me "i think" My VD numbers always match my 1/4 Traps they should go.
550whp i went 129-130 mph
630whp i went 133.6 mph
that is pretty much dead on full weight and street tires "not to mention shifting in 5th" i think that hurts your MPH some say it doesnt, good thing is we will find out in less then month of that is true or not. Just put 4.11's in there with the same setup as the 133.6mph so we will we if i gain MPH.







