Blevins tuned Evo 8 stock turbo 383/362 PUMP GAS 23 psii
Jan 19, 2013, 07:42 PM
#16
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can certainly feel the difference lol it's night and day but that 360 tq isn't as hard to swallow as the typical 320-330 most have to transition from coming from e85 as I said I will likely still run corn 75% of the time but this tune is making me love me some pump gas lol.
Jan 19, 2013, 08:17 PM
#17
also i wouldn't say this tune is conservative. it cant conservatively make these #'s. its coming from the timing map, which wont be conservative.
i hate to point out the flaws with the cold start on e85, but it will only better your experience with your evo in the future.
Last edited by tscompusa; Jan 19, 2013 at 09:01 PM.
Jan 19, 2013, 10:33 PM
#20
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
shouldn't need to dial it in. its something that should have been there by default with the first map. just trying to help you out so you get better service in the future from your tuner.
also i wouldn't say this tune is conservative. it cant conservatively make these #'s. its coming from the timing map, which wont be conservative.
i hate to point out the flaws with the cold start on e85, but it will only better your experience with your evo in the future.
also i wouldn't say this tune is conservative. it cant conservatively make these #'s. its coming from the timing map, which wont be conservative.
i hate to point out the flaws with the cold start on e85, but it will only better your experience with your evo in the future.
And I don't mind the criticism I would give any advice I had also. But from my end I am not concerned with it. I'm sure if he is capable of doing what he has he can make it idle at start up I just haven't been that bothered with it. The pouring of the gas from cans was by far the ending factor of e85 in the winter.
Jan 19, 2013, 11:21 PM
#22
Lol I'm 150% satisfied with my tuner. No doubt about that. I seen the log of the timing advance. As far as the timing, afr's, and boost overall it is conservative. Very low afr's, low boost, the timing is not dangerous at all. I would call that conservative.
And I don't mind the criticism I would give any advice I had also. But from my end I am not concerned with it. I'm sure if he is capable of doing what he has he can make it idle at start up I just haven't been that bothered with it. The pouring of the gas from cans was by far the ending factor of e85 in the winter.
And I don't mind the criticism I would give any advice I had also. But from my end I am not concerned with it. I'm sure if he is capable of doing what he has he can make it idle at start up I just haven't been that bothered with it. The pouring of the gas from cans was by far the ending factor of e85 in the winter.
Last edited by tscompusa; Jan 20, 2013 at 12:36 AM.
Jan 21, 2013, 10:21 AM
#29
the word conservative means two different things for us i can tell. to me it means there's more power left to get from the tune and that it is purposely detuned. for example, say i have a fp black and im making 600whp. if i want to make the tune conservative, im going to lower it to 550whp and call it done. so i think were just using the word differently. definitely a misunderstanding. in no way was i trying to imply you have a dangerous tune.
Very true ^, & this is a very apparent misunderstanding on these forums.
Jan 21, 2013, 04:10 PM
#30
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well most people say "conservative" or "aggressive" tunes. Throw out English class. So in that instance "conservative" would mean not "aggressive". This is how I look at it based on how people speak about tuning. But I can understand the confusion I guess. Either way. Big power. No danger. Me happy.