Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Stock Block HTA86 madness

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 01:00 PM
  #31  
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: KSA
great numbers on sexy car .. good luck
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 01:13 PM
  #32  
Hołek's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Poland
Beautiful is the first photo
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 05:40 PM
  #33  
Blue91lx's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 5
From: Philadelphia, PA
Are you on stock fuel lines? If so, that's damn impressive in all aspects of fuel.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 06:13 PM
  #34  
04slowevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
From: Hinesville, GA 31313
He is on stock fuel lines and stock fpr. Just some FIC 2150cc and walbro 450LPH.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 02:08 AM
  #35  
WikdEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 604
Likes: 3
From: Des Moines, IA
^^ exactly. The 450 is also hardwired. I drilled the siphon out to 9/64
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 02:37 AM
  #36  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by Tom Stout
Hmm I wonder if it is actually.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...mph-traps.html

631 on that mustang is about 720 on a dynojet, so you got a ways to go yet.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 04:59 AM
  #37  
d-bo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: 716NY
Originally Posted by tscompusa
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...mph-traps.html 631 on that mustang is about 720 on a dynojet, so you got a ways to go yet.
Do you happen to know the weight of this car ? I'm trying to see how much more weight I need to take out of my car lol. And what power level is needed to get around 10.0-10.2 stock block ?

I think I am around 2850/2900 now. For reference I trapped 127 on 25psi 93 Oct standard 35r previously (car was about 250lbs heavier I believe)
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 05:11 AM
  #38  
st0mp860's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Vernon Rockville, Connecticut
Dang, making me feel like I should just keep my stock block and not build it!
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 06:05 AM
  #39  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
Originally Posted by st0mp860
Dang, making me feel like I should just keep my stock block and not build it!
Only if you could afford a big rebuild. Ted B used to compare it to jumpers that waited until the very last second to pull their parachute.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 06:48 AM
  #40  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Originally Posted by d-bo
Do you happen to know the weight of this car ? I'm trying to see how much more weight I need to take out of my car lol. And what power level is needed to get around 10.0-10.2 stock block ?

I think I am around 2850/2900 now. For reference I trapped 127 on 25psi 93 Oct standard 35r previously (car was about 250lbs heavier I believe)
The weight is in the thread there on the dyno graphs. That car varied from 3100-3200lb with driver.

I cant answer the ET question accurately. There are to many variables. A full weight car at 700whp dynojet should have no problem with low 10 sec passes though.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 07:08 AM
  #41  
d-bo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: 716NY
Originally Posted by tscompusa
The weight is in the thread there on the dyno graphs. That car varied from 3100-3200lb with driver. I cant answer the ET question accurately. There are to many variables. A full weight car at 700whp dynojet should have no problem with low 10 sec passes though.
Ah I forgot about the weight on the graph. I noticed some times when others post them they aren't even close to accurate weights so I didn't know if the weight was the car itself, or if there are multiple passengers or something during time of the graph. I should have figured yours would be closest. Thank you !

Last edited by d-bo; Jan 22, 2014 at 07:14 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 07:15 AM
  #42  
way2qik's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 651
Likes: 5
From: With my admirers in the BACK ROOM!
Originally Posted by tscompusa
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...mph-traps.html

631 on that mustang is about 720 on a dynojet, so you got a ways to go yet.
^^^^exactly right. 146mph is the tell...

Tom Stout, your car at your power level on a DJ will probably trap in the 135mph range. Turn the boost up to 40-44psi range and you'll be in the power range of the car tscompusa just linked.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 12:27 PM
  #43  
WikdEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 604
Likes: 3
From: Des Moines, IA
haha.. i'm not chasing any records or anything, just having fun with the car.

On the log posted there were 3 people in my car with a few things in the trunk. The weight was pretty accurate.

With me being on stock tranny i'm gear/rev limited to 8000-8500 anyhow. somewhere around 135 i think.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2014 | 04:22 AM
  #44  
SiriusEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 195
Likes: 4
From: D
How did the car hold up over the summer?
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2014 | 05:48 AM
  #45  
WikdEvo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 604
Likes: 3
From: Des Moines, IA
Back in April I installed a twin disc clutch, 3.5" exhaust and a 3" uicp. Shortly thereafter the #1 rod went through the block. The car now has a built motor and will be getting retuned very soon.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:11 PM.