Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

JMS Racing built 2.3/Super 99 - 947/640

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 03:57 PM
  #16  
tscompusa's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 10,299
Likes: 67
From: PA
Matt you have a serious machine even more so then before now! Be careful with that beast
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2014 | 05:14 PM
  #17  
d-bo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 371
Likes: 1
From: 716NY
This really changes my opinion on big turbo big motor setups. Awesome. I would have thought you would need a 2.0 with rpm to do those kind of numbers. Still making 300/300 at 4500. It's probably still better than a 35r on a 2.0
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 12:24 PM
  #18  
mitsubeastlee's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 947
Likes: 2
From: San Jose, Ca
Go back and look at the cam shootout. Someone else mentioned on our local forum that the graph for the tomei 290s was not correct. The torque and hp does NOT cross at 5252....also it say they made higher peak numbers than they did. Look at the x y graph and plot where it made peak gains.....it doesn't match the graph.
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2014 | 06:31 PM
  #19  
ID #376's Avatar
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: DirTy jErsEz
Thumbs up Great numbers

Great numbers man! Good luck with your beast. Wish I had ***** like you. I'm afraid to go beyond 800WHP.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 04:48 AM
  #20  
EVOjunky's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
Originally Posted by mitsubeastlee
Go back and look at the cam shootout. Someone else mentioned on our local forum that the graph for the tomei 290s was not correct. The torque and hp does NOT cross at 5252....also it say they made higher peak numbers than they did. Look at the x y graph and plot where it made peak gains.....it doesn't match the graph.
Not all graphs will cross at 5252.
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2014 | 05:09 AM
  #21  
st0mp860's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: Vernon Rockville, Connecticut
Geez, nice numbers. Can't imagine what this car feels like.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2014 | 11:45 PM
  #22  
Liqquid's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 4
From: Sag-Nasty, MI
Originally Posted by d-bo
This really changes my opinion on big turbo big motor setups. Awesome. I would have thought you would need a 2.0 with rpm to do those kind of numbers. Still making 300/300 at 4500. It's probably still better than a 35r on a 2.0
I'd like to see how the power curve would continue to play out on a 2.0, even though it may not come in as early it may result in a wider usable powerband. In fact, I should put one of these on my car and see how it works
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2014 | 12:29 AM
  #23  
Eric SlowEvo8's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 324
Likes: 18
From: Tx
Yep joaq , Jorge and the guys are great . They are like fam. Did our civic and my Bros old fp black Evo . Can't wait tu get mines ready for the 6266 swap with the dual 485s and that j tune
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2014 | 05:58 AM
  #24  
FL_SilverEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,139
Likes: 0
From: Fort Myers, FL
Seeing that dyno graph reminds me of the Prices it's right Cliffhanger guy.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
niclo13
Evo X General
4
Apr 4, 2017 05:53 PM
MisterHappy
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
13
Jan 3, 2017 11:52 AM
dsm91red
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
44
Aug 16, 2015 09:55 AM
Boost_Inspired
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
49
Jan 4, 2014 04:25 PM
YNGEVO
For Sale - Cars For Sale
211
Jun 14, 2011 05:03 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:41 AM.