Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

EnglishRacing SLR2.2 PTE 7175 1084/744

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2014, 03:05 PM
  #46  
Evolved Member
 
Benja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia.
Posts: 800
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
80psi base, dual 044s, and just the normal 75 amp relay rewire. I dont know that we checked it on this car but on other cars I have seen 14v at the pump doing this.
Hmmm.... 80psi base, no boost reference on the reg?

Last edited by Benja; Mar 24, 2014 at 03:37 PM.
Old Mar 24, 2014, 03:19 PM
  #47  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Boost reference on the gate? Adjustable FPR set to 80psi with no vacuum. Drops to 70ish with the engine on and then at 0" is back to 80 of course, and more with boost .
Old Mar 24, 2014, 03:39 PM
  #48  
Evolved Member
 
Benja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newcastle, Australia.
Posts: 800
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Boost reference on the gate? Adjustable FPR set to 80psi with no vacuum. Drops to 70ish with the engine on and then at 0" is back to 80 of course, and more with boost .
Sorry meant on the reg, edited.

I'm struggling to work out how twin 044's at 14v keep up with ~100+psi rail pressure running E98 at 850+whp unless i'm missing something.
Old Mar 24, 2014, 05:29 PM
  #49  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
When we flow tested them they flowed 2400cc every 15 seconds. There are some secrets to get that flow out of them at 14V. Its an off the shelf pump but we didnt just bolt them on. In looking at them since we feel we can get more than that possibly if we tried a few other things.
Old Mar 24, 2014, 07:35 PM
  #50  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
doghouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Jamaica
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice
Old Mar 25, 2014, 06:17 PM
  #51  
Newbie
 
smtevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
When we flow tested them they flowed 2400cc every 15 seconds. There are some secrets to get that flow out of them at 14V. Its an off the shelf pump but we didnt just bolt them on. In looking at them since we feel we can get more than that possibly if we tried a few other things.
2.2 + 71mm turbo = great combo!

2400cc / 15 seconds total flow for the two pumps with no pressure?
Old Mar 25, 2014, 07:02 PM
  #52  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
2 pumps at 100psi rail pressure. We knew we were going to start with a 50psi base and expected to run 50psi so its where we started. Basically it means that it flows more than the injectors at 50psi base so we were golden. At 80psi base the 2150s should flow something like 2800cc as long as it has pump to supply it up top. Apparently it does since we can run an 11.2 at 50psi.

Last edited by JohnBradley; Mar 25, 2014 at 07:05 PM.
Old Mar 25, 2014, 08:54 PM
  #53  
Newbie
 
smtevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bosch motorsport list the 9BAR Bosch 044 at 210L/hr (9BAR 14V) = 1750cc / 15 sec (2 pumps)

http://www.bosch-motorsport.de/media...6426379pdf.pdf

Seems like an error to match 7000cc/min fuel pumps with 15600cc/min injectors
(data from injector dynamics website - id2000 @ 130psi)

Why not run <40psi rail + 50psi boost = 90psi / 6BAR rail pressure?
You would then get another 20% out of the pumps - 250l/hr up from 210l/hr (8300cc/min)
With 4 x Injectors still capable of 12500cc/min

Still not ideal but surely safer / "better"?

Dont want to take anything away from the car itself... Great build. I have a similar setup. Big fan!
Old Mar 25, 2014, 10:20 PM
  #54  
Newbie
iTrader: (7)
 
yeyeee evo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Lubbock Tx
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Super nice build leaning towards same motor and super 99
Old Mar 26, 2014, 05:01 AM
  #55  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Drifto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Alabaster, AL
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
That graph is insane!! Great job Aaron, ER, and ETS. Such and awesome build. I wish like hell you guys were closer!
Old Mar 26, 2014, 08:28 AM
  #56  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
These arent exactly stock 044s as I said before. Also because it works fine as is.

Originally Posted by smtevo
Bosch motorsport list the 9BAR Bosch 044 at 210L/hr (9BAR 14V) = 1750cc / 15 sec (2 pumps)

http://www.bosch-motorsport.de/media...6426379pdf.pdf

Seems like an error to match 7000cc/min fuel pumps with 15600cc/min injectors
(data from injector dynamics website - id2000 @ 130psi)

Why not run <40psi rail + 50psi boost = 90psi / 6BAR rail pressure?
You would then get another 20% out of the pumps - 250l/hr up from 210l/hr (8300cc/min)
With 4 x Injectors still capable of 12500cc/min

Still not ideal but surely safer / "better"?

Dont want to take anything away from the car itself... Great build. I have a similar setup. Big fan!
Old Mar 26, 2014, 01:51 PM
  #57  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
mrfred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Posts: 9,675
Received 128 Likes on 96 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
These arent exactly stock 044s as I said before. Also because it works fine as is.
80 psi base pressure + 50 psi boost would mean the rail pressure is 130 psi at that point. That is some badass fuel pressure. From a tech point of view, I would love to see a log confirming that, but practically speaking, it apparently got the job done.

BTW - Awesome build. I haven't been a fan of the big turbos, but that is the nicest big turbo powerband I've seen yet. I'm sure its due not only to the turbo but a great selection of supporting parts.
Old Mar 26, 2014, 04:58 PM
  #58  
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
luis p botas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 37
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Revs

In this engine, what is the max rev you do? Do you use the original hydraulic lifters or...? Many tx
Old Mar 26, 2014, 06:07 PM
  #59  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
9500 and OE lifters.
Old Mar 26, 2014, 06:11 PM
  #60  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
JohnBradley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northwest
Posts: 11,396
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Mychailo this isnt directed at you but also answers your question

I am not going to keep answering the how because when you innovate and share it seems no one remembers who innovates. When you innovate and stay quiet, people buy your product because no one else knows how it works, you get to keep racing.

I also have gotten out of the habit of showing data online. Since it has been shown what a box stock 044 should flow, we have 2 of them, we run 52psi boost with an indicated 11.79 AFR on our dyno (which always seems to read 0.5 off), and we have x4 2150s, the math takes care of itself. All of the pics are there to show the setup.

a + b = c


Quick Reply: EnglishRacing SLR2.2 PTE 7175 1084/744



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:58 PM.