Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 8 Stock Block FP Red 91 oct

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2016 | 11:00 PM
  #16  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
I trapped 119 or 120 with about 350-375, I think?. I can't really remember, it's been a while. But it definitely wasn't 450.

I've definitely never seen a red make torque like that on 91, at that elevation, on a 2.0, on an VIII.
OP: I think your dyno may be off.

Last edited by kaj; Jan 10, 2016 at 11:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 10:57 AM
  #17  
EVOIXreno's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Reno,NV
This is a dyno jet, you guys understand that right
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
It doesn't matter if its a dynojet, unless you're messing with the CF, the red simply doesn't make that kind of torque on 91. You'd be luck to get 350-375wtq on 91 octane.


Like I said, my car on virtual dyno made 450wtq at 33.5psi on E85. You're claiming to make more than that, on less boost, on much lower octane fuel. It's just not happening. 121mph trap sounds like a ~400whp car depending on how you're getting off the line. Also, the red carries boost well enough out the top that it makes more HP than TQ. Idk what you're doing with the dyno, but it's not correct.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 12:11 PM
  #19  
EVOIXreno's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Reno,NV
There's no way to mess with a cf on a dyno jet.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 12:20 PM
  #20  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Idk what to tell you other than those figures just aren't really possible.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 12:28 PM
  #21  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by EVOIXreno
There's no way to mess with a cf on a dyno jet.
There are many ways to mess with CF on a DJ. Care to post the CF factor for your dynochart in post #1? Or better yet, the run file?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 01:45 PM
  #22  
ctfpevoVIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 66
From: connecticut
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Idk what to tell you other than those figures just aren't really possible.
91 oct - e85
27 psi - 33 psi
491 awtrq - 450 awtrq

yeah it just doesn't add up and hitting peak torque before 4000 rpm and at 4500 ' elevation also???? Not even possible and this is still a 2.0 engine still ?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2016 | 03:36 PM
  #23  
ZanarkO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 485
Likes: 4
From: Virginia
lmao Curt brown must use captured magic fairies to port those parts jesus christ.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 08:19 AM
  #24  
DSMolition's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 524
Likes: 18
From: IOWA
That fp red hits peak tq before my 9 turbo on e85!! l
Attached Thumbnails Evo 8 Stock Block FP Red 91 oct-400-400-dyno-rs.bmp  
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 08:59 AM
  #25  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
400wtq on a mustang dyno, on E85. Equals about 440-450wtq on a dynojet. And at 30psi. Once again showing the improbability of the OP's numbers..
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2016 | 09:29 AM
  #26  
Merle's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Fl
interesting
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 12:20 PM
  #27  
evo8vz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 285
Likes: 12
From: Italy Venezia
Seems a little off would love to make that type of torque on even E85. Most torque I have seen on pure 91 octane I think was around 400 and on an FP Green.

Would you mind telling us your peak timing at redline and timing at peak torque?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 01:58 PM
  #28  
EVOIXreno's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Reno,NV
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
It doesn't matter if its a dynojet, unless you're messing with the CF, the red simply doesn't make that kind of torque on 91. You'd be luck to get 350-375wtq on 91 octane.


Like I said, my car on virtual dyno made 450wtq at 33.5psi on E85. You're claiming to make more than that, on less boost, on much lower octane fuel. It's just not happening. 121mph trap sounds like a ~400whp car depending on how you're getting off the line. Also, the red carries boost well enough out the top that it makes more HP than TQ. Idk what you're doing with the dyno, but it's not correct.
Originally Posted by razorlab
There are many ways to mess with CF on a DJ. Care to post the CF factor for your dynochart in post #1? Or better yet, the run file?
I looked up graph, Dynojet was on STD correction. I changed it to UNCorrected, #'s are 414 and 435
I'll post graph when I'm done tuning.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 02:16 PM
  #29  
EVOIXreno's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 541
Likes: 0
From: Reno,NV
Originally Posted by evo8vz
seems a little off would love to make that type of torque on even e85. Most torque i have seen on pure 91 octane i think was around 400 and on an fp green.

Would you mind telling us your peak timing at redline and timing at peak torque?
3*-9*
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2016 | 02:22 PM
  #30  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,634
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
That's still a lot of torque, really fast.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:49 AM.