Notices
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

2.0 6466 evo 9

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 23, 2017 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
litz4244's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: north east
2.0 6466 evo 9

Just installed infinity on the car and made some pulls.

9 to 1 2.0
Manley turbo tuff rods
Wiesco hd pistons
Gsc s3 cams
Stock ports on the head
Curt brown ported skunk 2 intake manifold
Full blown throttle body
Shearer fab standard placement turbo kit
6466 t3 .82
Ts comp tune twin pump with -8 feed and -6 return.
2150 injectors
E85
Built trans and t case
Triple disc
Sorry if I left anything out.
Car is on 40 psi
Imw’s mustang dyno
Attached Thumbnails 2.0 6466 evo 9-photo838.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2017 | 01:37 AM
  #2  
Sheriff's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Nice. I am building a 2.3.
Mild porting
Solid lifters
With a 6466 .84 t4 flange divided
I am trying to figure out what the 6466 with a .84 rear is rated at,
Does anyone know what size rear housing precision rates their turbos?
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 07:35 AM
  #3  
ineedboostman's Avatar
Evolving Member
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 220
Likes: 8
From: Tri State
84 is too small in divided. You wants something more like 1.15
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 08:17 AM
  #4  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Sheriff
Nice. I am building a 2.3.
Mild porting
Solid lifters
With a 6466 .84 t4 flange divided
I am trying to figure out what the 6466 with a .84 rear is rated at,
Does anyone know what size rear housing precision rates their turbos?
As stated above you're going to at least want a 1.15ar hot side.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 12:46 PM
  #5  
Sheriff's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
As stated above you're going to at least want a 1.15ar hot side.
I choose .84 to keep it streetable. Rather sacrifice a bit on top and get a better punch, it's a four Cylinder bro. I asked a different question regarding the rated hp of that turbo with that rear housing. Has anyone tried the 6466 with a .84 rear and what was the result ?

Last edited by Sheriff; Sep 25, 2017 at 01:52 PM. Reason: Adding info
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 03:37 PM
  #6  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Sheriff
I choose .84 to keep it streetable. Rather sacrifice a bit on top and get a better punch, it's a four Cylinder bro. I asked a different question regarding the rated hp of that turbo with that rear housing. Has anyone tried the 6466 with a .84 rear and what was the result ?
No, but I have a 1.15 on 2.4LR in the shop, and it's a great street setup. On boil at 4500rpm.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 04:32 PM
  #7  
Sheriff's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
No, but I have a 1.15 on 2.4LR in the shop, and it's a great street setup. On boil at 4500rpm.
I will have to wait till after the dyno to be sure to be sure. What did your combo make ?
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 05:43 PM
  #8  
nismo3183's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 133
Likes: 2
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by Sheriff
I will have to wait till after the dyno to be sure to be sure. What did your combo make ?
Let me know if your interested in a 1.15 housing. I’m selling my ceramic coated housing as I recently switched to a vband .82.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 05:46 PM
  #9  
Sheriff's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by nismo3183
Let me know if your interested in a 1.15 housing. I €™m selling my ceramic coated housing as I recently switched to a vband .82.
will do. Too much lagg bro ? Hehe
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 11:25 PM
  #10  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Sheriff
I will have to wait till after the dyno to be sure to be sure. What did your combo make ?
It made 820whp and 665wtq at 36psi.

Sorry for the thread derail OP.
Reply
Old Sep 25, 2017 | 11:34 PM
  #11  
Sheriff's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
It made 820whp and 665wtq at 36psi.

Sorry for the thread derail OP.
dude that's is fkn insane. 600 plus kw. How much do you think I would loose running the .84? I would be jumping over the moon with the cat the fiddle and the silver spoon if I made 550 kw at all four
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 02:13 AM
  #12  
Evo9_Dubai's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 451
Likes: 21
From: Dubai
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
It made 820whp and 665wtq at 36psi.

Sorry for the thread derail OP.
Thats nice numbers.
I am also running a 2.3L 6466 .82 vband and will post numbers soon.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2017 | 07:50 AM
  #13  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Sheriff
dude that's is fkn insane. 600 plus kw. How much do you think I would loose running the .84? I would be jumping over the moon with the cat the fiddle and the silver spoon if I made 550 kw at all four
Not sure, but that housing is needlessly small. Smallest I would go is the 1.0ar.


And thanks. English Racing did a great job on the motor and tune. The owner is super happy with it.
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2017 | 12:39 AM
  #14  
djbaselle's Avatar
Newbie
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: NYC
I hope too make similar numbers. What hp is safe for stock TCASE?
Reply
Old Nov 8, 2017 | 06:00 AM
  #15  
Eric SlowEvo8's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 324
Likes: 18
From: Tx
good numbers , my old evo made 730 with same turbo, ill see what my 2.4 now makes on a 6262 bb and depending might go over to a 6466 like my old evo had
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 PM.