Notices
Evo Electrical / Audio / Security Discuss electrical systems, audio system upgrades, or alarm configurations.

Rear crash beam mod for JDM IX rear bumper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 02:34 PM
  #1  
evolucion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
Rear crash beam mod for JDM IX rear bumper

SophieSleeps has done it again folks. I highly recommended that you get your beam's modded. Fitting is perfect. Here's how it look on my car. Thanx again bro.





Now I can feel 25 mph safer.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #2  
sonicteam120's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: Bronx / coram
I hope you brought some jdm 8 or 9 taillights for that back
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 03:37 PM
  #3  
TearItUpSports's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX (NW)
You should not feel safer. You have removed the part of the bumper that absorbs the impact (hint: its not the beam).

BTW that beam is rated for 5 mph. Even stock it will have almost no affect on a 25 mph crash.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #4  
Speed Element's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (270)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,569
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by TearItUpSports
You should not feel safer. You have removed the part of the bumper that absorbs the impact (hint: its not the beam).

BTW that beam is rated for 5 mph. Even stock it will have almost no affect on a 25 mph crash.
+1 .. however, we are still offering this option just so customers will "FEEL" safer.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 05:57 PM
  #5  
JDMCT9MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
^I agree. I would still rather have something behind the JDM IX rear than nothing.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 06:01 PM
  #6  
ak47po's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 3
From: out
Your insurance adjuster might like to see the crash bar there when you get rear-ended.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #7  
SME's Avatar
SME
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: Michigan now
Originally Posted by ak47po
Your insurance adjuster might like to see the crash bar there when you get rear-ended.
true lol
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2008 | 10:32 PM
  #8  
leira619's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Honestly, i know some insurance adjusters and most of them don't even know what to look for. just think about it, if you were to get rear ended and it's pretty bad, your car will be so jacked, they won't be able to tell what is what when they see the damage.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2008 | 02:12 PM
  #9  
SophieSleeps's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Butthole, MA
Say what you will. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.

I have seen EVO's in low speed "bumps" and the damage that occurs to the rear of the car is considerable when you don't have a crash bar.

Either way there will be damage. It's really a difference in the type of damage.

At high speed you're screwed regardless of what you have there.

This is for lower speeds.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2008 | 07:22 AM
  #10  
NJ9MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
FCOTM Winner
15 Year Member
Shutterbug
Liked
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 43
From: N.New Jersey, SoCal & Tokyo, Japan
After doing this crash beam mod., can you re-install the foam pad too??? Thanks!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 01:28 PM
  #11  
evolucion's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, WA
no, I don't think you can. I didn't tried it, but I see no room for it tho.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 01:31 PM
  #12  
Mulholland0132's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 848
Likes: 1
From: CT
Originally Posted by TearItUpSports
You should not feel safer. You have removed the part of the bumper that absorbs the impact (hint: its not the beam).

BTW that beam is rated for 5 mph. Even stock it will have almost no affect on a 25 mph crash.
I disagree....I had SophieSleeps do this to my rear beam as well.....and it fit perfect. Those pieces will not change the beams crash absorption IMO.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #13  
qwon526's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
is there a pic of the crash beam before the modification?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2008 | 01:09 AM
  #14  
LM-D's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: america
Originally Posted by leira619
Honestly, i know some insurance adjusters and most of them don't even know what to look for. just think about it, if you were to get rear ended and it's pretty bad, your car will be so jacked, they won't be able to tell what is what when they see the damage.
untrue. This is whats called a supplement for an adjuster. For damage the adjuster can't yet see, he will come back again when the body shop has found hidden damage underneath in the process of the repair. The supplement will be added ontop of the first evaluation. I also know some adjusters and some have done as much as ten supplements to a single car.

Not sure which part of the country your from or which company these adjusters work for but thats shoddy worksmanship on their part. However i do know that some companies train there adjusters better than others, alot better.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2008 | 07:18 AM
  #15  
Dropspeed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Detroit area
Originally Posted by Mulholland0132
I disagree....I had SophieSleeps do this to my rear beam as well.....and it fit perfect. Those pieces will not change the beams crash absorption IMO.
Incorrect. The beam itself is designed to distribute the weight (impact from the crash) evenly across the back of the car and direct it to the 2 "shock absorbers" What you/they did was remove the part of the bumper beam that is indeed the part that is designed to “absorb” the impact.

Now this is far better than removing it all together….but your statement is incorrect.

Matt
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:52 PM.