Rear crash beam mod for JDM IX rear bumper
Rear crash beam mod for JDM IX rear bumper
SophieSleeps has done it again folks. I highly recommended that you get your beam's modded. Fitting is perfect. Here's how it look on my car. Thanx again bro.


Now I can feel 25 mph safer.


Now I can feel 25 mph safer.
You should not feel safer. You have removed the part of the bumper that absorbs the impact (hint: its not the beam).
BTW that beam is rated for 5 mph. Even stock it will have almost no affect on a 25 mph crash.
BTW that beam is rated for 5 mph. Even stock it will have almost no affect on a 25 mph crash.
+1 .. however, we are still offering this option just so customers will "FEEL" safer.
Trending Topics
Honestly, i know some insurance adjusters and most of them don't even know what to look for. just think about it, if you were to get rear ended and it's pretty bad, your car will be so jacked, they won't be able to tell what is what when they see the damage.
Say what you will. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I have seen EVO's in low speed "bumps" and the damage that occurs to the rear of the car is considerable when you don't have a crash bar.
Either way there will be damage. It's really a difference in the type of damage.
At high speed you're screwed regardless of what you have there.
This is for lower speeds.
I have seen EVO's in low speed "bumps" and the damage that occurs to the rear of the car is considerable when you don't have a crash bar.
Either way there will be damage. It's really a difference in the type of damage.
At high speed you're screwed regardless of what you have there.
This is for lower speeds.
I disagree....I had SophieSleeps do this to my rear beam as well.....and it fit perfect. Those pieces will not change the beams crash absorption IMO.
Not sure which part of the country your from or which company these adjusters work for but thats shoddy worksmanship on their part. However i do know that some companies train there adjusters better than others, alot better.
Now this is far better than removing it all together….but your statement is incorrect.
Matt








