Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

OMG the work throttle body is the SH$t!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #46  
VTECH8TR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (70)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: La Isla Del Encanto
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Why shouldn't the effects of a TB upgrade be seen on a dyno? If Xhp gains are claimed, this should translate to a dyno in some form, right?

IC testing, due to the issues mentioned earlier in this thread, isn't so easy. However, my friends at PVO/Dodge are actually trying to address this issue with SAE by standardizing the dyno conditions to account for intercooler efficiencies-- something that has yet to be done, AFAIK.

Shiv
Shiv,

I would love to see this happen .
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 06:56 PM
  #47  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by VTECH8TR
Shiv,

I would love to see this happen .
Me too. The idea, so far, is to standardize dyno conditions to simulate a 3rd gear pull from low rpm to redline. For example, if it takes 15 seconds for a particular car to do so on the street, it should take 15 seconds to do so on the dyno. More hp, the shorter period of time. Taller gears, the longer period of time. Likewise, airflow speeds should also rise as it would on the street. This is a bit tough to accomplish with certain types of dyno facilities but it should at least give the community a common direction to go when trying to quanitify the effects of certain upgrades. Too many times in this in this industry to people hide behind the titles of "engineers" and consistently fail to provide any emperical data to back up their claims. Similarily, these "engineers" often fail to explain opposing emperical data that suggest otherwise.

Shiv

Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Nov 26, 2004 at 07:09 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 06:57 PM
  #48  
marksae's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
As a consumer, I'd definitely like to see some dyno results or 1/4 mile times before slapping down $350 for a part like this. I question the gains claimed for this throttle body because I experience little difference when upgrading the throttle body from 52mm to 60mm on my GSX.

*EDIT*

I port matched the inlet of my intake manifold to 60mm at the same time I installed the 60mm 1g throttle body.

Last edited by marksae; Nov 26, 2004 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 07:19 PM
  #49  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by Ted B
A larger throttle body can give the impression of more power at part throttle simply because it allows more air through at a given throttle angle. This can create the illusion that the engine is more 'peppy' (an old Subaru and Honda trick), and fool one's 'butt dyno', which is inaccurate anyway. Of course, unless the factory TB creates a significant pressure drop at WOT, there will be little or no increase in WOT power.

At this time, neither sellers nor any individuals can come forth with a properly conducted dyno test that substantiates any claims. This being the case, I'll remain dubious as to the benefits of a larger TB unless someone can come clean with a quality test that demonstrates otherwise.

In the meantime, I'll relegate this part with the likes of aftermarket intakes, larger IC and such, which have proven to be non-issues (or even detrimental) where reaching the power limits of the factory turbo are desired. With cars running 11sec E.T.'s with factory air boxes, IC's and TBs, money can be better spent elsewhere in the powertrain.

There are at least 1000 ways to throw money at these cars, and at least 900 of them amount to nothing more than exercises in financial depletion and 'bling'.
Sig quoted for truth. Excellent post!
For the cost, you'll get a lot more real (WOT) power from cam gears or a 10.5" hotside.

Last edited by Noize; Nov 26, 2004 at 08:16 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 07:41 PM
  #50  
robert5995's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 3
From: Boulder, Colorado
"The great Empirical Dyno God does not always give the answer that one is looking for. For instance old straight six Jaguar engines as installed in C, D and E-types if any of you are old enough to remember these make more power on the dyno with SU carburators but they run faster lap times with Webers, which is why in fact the factory always fitted their hot race engines with Webers. The reason has to do with the accelerator pumps in the Weber and the lack of them in the SU. This affected transient throttle response suffciently to make up for the small but signifcant power advantage of the SU on a road circuit."

Alleggerita -

I totally agree with what you're saying about the E-types, which I have spent my time with. I am firmly convinced that with issues like the Webers' accelerator pumps, or certain carbs' leaning out the float chamber around certain corners, or whatever, the road "dyno" is certainly a better place than the shop dyno to do R&D. However, in this day and age of fuel injection and engine ECU programming, the shop dyno is a powerful tool, and way more applicable to "road usage" than older cars. I think that's why I and some other scientists (I'm a Mechanical Engineer Car Geek) demand empirical evidence to support some of these claims that people make. Shiv says the Xede works, and he has the charts to prove it. That's what works for a majority of the buying public. I can't understand why more vendors don't do the same. Thanks for the great post.

- Rob
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2004 | 07:46 PM
  #51  
02MaximizedVQ's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Jackson, MS
A 59mm throttle diameter is not bad at all. The stock 2G DSM's had a 52mm aperture. I believe you could buy an aftermarket unit from from BBK through Summit that measured 62mm for $290.00...So all in all, 59 isn't bad. Also its important that you port match your intake manifold to match any increase in throttle diameter for smooth flow.

Jesse
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:14 PM
  #52  
b18flip's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
How big does Works machine the OEM throttle body to? 63mm?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:27 PM
  #53  
ex-honda's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: North bay
Originally Posted by Ted B
A larger throttle body can give the impression of more power at part throttle simply because it allows more air through at a given throttle angle. This can create the illusion that the engine is more 'peppy' (an old Subaru and Honda trick), and fool one's 'butt dyno', which is inaccurate anyway.

Originally Posted by b18flip
How big does Works machine the OEM throttle body to? 63mm?
I agree with Ted B 100%. It gives you the "feel" of having more power since it comes in more earlier due to the larger diameter TB.

Works takes the stock TB to a machine shop somewhere across the San Francisco bayarea which is where they also make the Works croxxplate ver. 2.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:38 PM
  #54  
b18flip's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
hhmm, i might just take my TB and bring it to a machine shop. I know of honda guys doing it for around $100 like this guy http://www.maxbore.com
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #55  
EvoTech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by b18flip
hhmm, i might just take my TB and bring it to a machine shop. I know of honda guys doing it for around $100 like this guy http://www.maxbore.com

This looks like a deal. Anyone used this guy yet?
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #56  
ex-honda's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 676
Likes: 0
From: North bay
To be safe, I would find a wrecked Evo ( which is not hard) and get the stock TB from them and use that one instead so when it's time for smog, just slap the stock one back.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 06:18 PM
  #57  
GokuSSj4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 603
Likes: 3
From: SoCal
RC engineering does Throtle bodies
but it does required a larger butterfly flapper on the inside. Im not sure what specs they can maximize with the stock evo TB. ITs near 290-310 to have it done. you are better off buying the aperture II from works for $340.00 + im sure they flash your car
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 06:31 PM
  #58  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Another reason Snoop could've gotten pulled down low is because with cam gears, you lose some midrange for a big gain up top. A VS0+ will definitely pull a VS1 at 3000rpm.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #59  
b18flip's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by gestalt
This looks like a deal. Anyone used this guy yet?
I know a lot of the www.honda-tech.com guys have gone to him w/ good results, i just emailed him about evo 8 TB's and how big he can go. The flappers are all custom machined to fit
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #60  
badlooser's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 704
Likes: 1
From: west palm beach,Fl
RC does nice work. I had them do a tb for me for a honda motor 3 years ago and it came out great it made a differance more on top rpm. Plus RC has a great history in racing(Russ Collins)
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:58 PM.