Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

280's on stock ECU and turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 05:44 AM
  #1  
gkania's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Deltona
280's on stock ECU and turbo installed

I don't know if I'm the first but I'm sure I'm pretty close to it, Stock ECU, no piggyback.

After hearing all the worries of 280's with the stock computer, I decided to go ahead and try it anyway and just wanted to let you guys know that it is very possible, and I have not had any problems to date. I have been running the car for two weeks, the idle is very lopey, but the car does not stall. To be perfectly honest with you I have had more probelms with my BOV and intake than I am with these cams. I am waiting for my wideband to go in before I take it back to Jestr Tuning for the reflash. Currently I am running the mode 1 flash, and have just turned down the boost so as not to cause any issues. I have lost some bottom end, but the top end pulls very strong. Keep in mind the car is yet untuned for the cams, and I'm running lower boost so the before and after is kind of skewed right now. Waiting for this wideband to come in is killing me. Once it finally comes in and it is tuned I will be taking it to the dyno to post up a sheet and to the track for some new numbers. If the car is running this well before tune, once Jestr works his magic, I'm expecting some very good things in the next few weeks. Good luck to anyone else who is considering these cams on stock ecu and turbo, I have not been disappointed.

P.S. I did install cam gears, they are currently set to -2/-2.

Last edited by gkania; Mar 10, 2005 at 05:50 AM. Reason: update
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 02:56 PM
  #2  
gkania's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Deltona
Hmmmm... All the questions about this a few weeks ago, and now noone cares? WOW!

Last edited by gkania; Mar 10, 2005 at 02:59 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2005 | 03:01 PM
  #3  
evo81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gkania
Hmmmm... All the questions about this a few weeks ago, and now noone cares? WOW!
welcome to evom
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 09:23 AM
  #4  
gkania's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Deltona
Why thank you.... Just trying to help out.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #5  
dru's Avatar
dru
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
i would be interested to see the dyno results.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #6  
EvoVIII_MR2005's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
I heard the 280's were overkill for stock turbo... Any comments on that?
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #7  
BSREVOLUTION's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
work fine in my evo.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #8  
masterevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Houston
There many ways to get power, and cams is the most compromise of them all. Big cam is a great trade off btw drivability and power. You're are pretty much taking the power from one part of powerband and shift it to another. When you dont have any tq or hp on the low end of ur powerband, ur making it that much more difficult for daily driving.

Not to mention that losing all the tq on the low end is making the car not fun to drive at all. Why dont u guys give the 272/264 setup a try. I think that's so much more fun to drive than the straight 272s or the 280s.

While on the subject of big cams, let me touch base on big turbos too. Big turbos is like big cams. You get massive power on the top end and nothing on the low end. Now when u combine the two, ur getting no low end and all top end. After big turbos and big cams with the aem, my evo felt lose and unrefine. Slowly day by day, I started to hate it and avoid driving it at all cause. Mod smartly, or you'll be very sorry. Take care guys. Happy modding,and as for me, i'm out of the game...For now...

Last edited by masterevo; Mar 11, 2005 at 10:41 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 10:51 PM
  #9  
sylvester31's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by masterevo
Happy modding,and as for me, i'm out of the game...For now...
come on man, you know you're not .
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 11:37 PM
  #10  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Don't even think about it John. You will need more.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #11  
evo81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,018
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by IE Evo
Don't even think about it John. You will need more.
off-topic-are you replying to what i'm reading get back to the thread

on-topic- i think 280s on a stock turbo are overkill.since you won't be the high in the bandwith to take advantage of them
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 11:39 PM
  #12  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Originally Posted by masterevo
There many ways to get power, and cams is the most compromise of them all. Big cam is a great trade off btw drivability and power. You're are pretty much taking the power from one part of powerband and shift it to another. When you dont have any tq or hp on the low end of ur powerband, ur making it that much more difficult for daily driving.

Not to mention that losing all the tq on the low end is making the car not fun to drive at all. Why dont u guys give the 272/264 setup a try. I think that's so much more fun to drive than the straight 272s or the 280s.

While on the subject of big cams, let me touch base on big turbos too. Big turbos is like big cams. You get massive power on the top end and nothing on the low end. Now when u combine the two, ur getting no low end and all top end. After big turbos and big cams with the aem, my evo felt lose and unrefine. Slowly day by day, I started to hate it and avoid driving it at all cause. Mod smartly, or you'll be very sorry. Take care guys. Happy modding,and as for me, i'm out of the game...For now...
Must of had a GT 35R. My 3037 is funner than the stocker and more civil iMO.
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #13  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Originally Posted by evo81
off-topic-are you replying to what i'm reading get back to the thread

on-topic- i think 280s on a stock turbo are overkill.since you won't be the high in the bandwith to take advantage of them
Hey have to admit caught you off guard. I agree no 280s for me yet. If LV Sti beats me then maybe.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #14  
gkania's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
From: Deltona
Well Im not exactly sure what you guys are experiencing but after a slight retune I have regained all my torque and have a huge increase in power. Or so it seems. Not a final tune as the wideband is till not here, but I am happier than ever with the car and think I made the right choice for what I'm after. I'll be back at the track tomorrow to see how it fares now.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #15  
Chris@nolimitmotors's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (277)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 2
From: long island,NY
I'll be doing 280's with the stock turbo and reflash soon also. i'm interested to see how it does
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 AM.