White Rabbit Deals Another 400 Whp Dyno
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
Yes, the car was run on race gas.. the low boost numbers weren't bad either..
I can't begin to describe the power curve of this car, Its not so much a peak number, but it hits around 390whp and stays there through redline. Torque peaks at 398 and stays fairly flat for quite awhile, at redline the car is still making over 250tq
This was on a hot day with diluted air in the dyno room too.. This turbo is a street warriors dream! I can only hope the BR20G can make the same results.
I can't begin to describe the power curve of this car, Its not so much a peak number, but it hits around 390whp and stays there through redline. Torque peaks at 398 and stays fairly flat for quite awhile, at redline the car is still making over 250tq
This was on a hot day with diluted air in the dyno room too.. This turbo is a street warriors dream! I can only hope the BR20G can make the same results.
Originally Posted by evo 8 ya
What were the pump gas #s?
pump gas the car made around 345-350 whp and tq.
basically he went from 358tq-398tw and 373whp-394whp imagine is he got the boost up to 28 psi. He probably would have made 420 whp.
seems like it's safe to say that the WR will not deliver better peak numbers than the stocker on pump gas, although the power curve will be better. I guess it's good for those trying to maximize their street setup.
Originally Posted by anjapower
seems like it's safe to say that the WR will not deliver better peak numbers than the stocker on pump gas, although the power curve will be better. I guess it's good for those trying to maximize their street setup.
Originally Posted by gonzo
Has anyone tried this setup using an SAFC II? Could those numbers be replicated using it or would they be down a whole bunch.
The question I'd consider before utilizing an SAFC with it is whether or not the timing at a lower MAF hz range is conservative enough for you to run consistently and safely.
Last edited by fury656; Aug 8, 2005 at 01:06 PM.
Originally Posted by gonzo
Has anyone tried this setup using an SAFC II? Could those numbers be replicated using it or would they be down a whole bunch.
Btw, this is coming from an S-AFC user, so I'm not being an anti-safc homer.
Originally Posted by anjapower
seems like it's safe to say that the WR will not deliver better peak numbers than the stocker on pump gas, although the power curve will be better. I guess it's good for those trying to maximize their street setup.
steve - as I recall it was higher than 24 psi....but it did make the #. It was not humid at all Saturday (around 30%), but hot as hell...and I know Ray's shop is insanely hot in and of itself
Knowing Pete and what he built this car for, its the perfect setup. As has been said many times, this turbo needs higher octane gas and lots of boost to pull the #s that were touted early on -as long as you know that going in, all should be good
Knowing Pete and what he built this car for, its the perfect setup. As has been said many times, this turbo needs higher octane gas and lots of boost to pull the #s that were touted early on -as long as you know that going in, all should be good
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
steve - as I recall it was higher than 24 psi....but it did make the #. It was not humid at all Saturday (around 30%), but hot as hell...and I know Ray's shop is insanely hot in and of itself
Knowing Pete and what he built this car for, its the perfect setup. As has been said many times, this turbo needs higher octane gas and lots of boost to pull the #s that were touted early on -as long as you know that going in, all should be good
Knowing Pete and what he built this car for, its the perfect setup. As has been said many times, this turbo needs higher octane gas and lots of boost to pull the #s that were touted early on -as long as you know that going in, all should be good


