Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Velocity of gas going thru the upper IC piping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 11:31 AM
  #16  
EvoTio's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
Originally Posted by SlowCar
the reason i am asking the question is to see where the best place to place my water injection nozzle. was deciding either immediately after the IC or the UPIC. with all the info from you guys, i think i will put it immediately after the IC


I mounted my Aquamist nozzle at the end of my stock UIP. It works great! See the attachment pic below. I don't advise that you place the nozzle before the diverter valve tube or the water mixture will be recirculated back into the turbo. I found that out when I had my BOV vented to the atmosphere on my Talon. When you let off the gas after a full throttle run, water was all over the engine. I E-Mailed Richard at Aquamist a while back and he advised me the bend in the UIP will actually help the water mixing with the air due to the speed diiferential between the outside and the inside of the bend. A small swirl will be generated near that area.
Attached Thumbnails Velocity of gas going thru the upper IC piping-uip-nozzle-pic.jpg  
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 02:28 PM
  #17  
SlowCar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Originally Posted by EvoTio
I mounted my Aquamist nozzle at the end of my stock UIP. It works great! See the attachment pic below. I don't advise that you place the nozzle before the diverter valve tube or the water mixture will be recirculated back into the turbo. I found that out when I had my BOV vented to the atmosphere on my Talon. When you let off the gas after a full throttle run, water was all over the engine. I E-Mailed Richard at Aquamist a while back and he advised me the bend in the UIP will actually help the water mixing with the air due to the speed diiferential between the outside and the inside of the bend. A small swirl will be generated near that area.
great info! gracias!
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 07:36 PM
  #18  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ted B
Peak velocity of airflow through the upper IC pipe occurs at the point of peak hp.
I believe the point is not peak HP, but peak RPM. The engine may be inefficiently trying to pull and inefficiently using the air at that RPM (hence tapering torque/power), but volumetric flow is still the highest at that point.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #19  
SlowCar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Originally Posted by Shaun@SG
I believe the point is not peak HP, but peak RPM. The engine may be inefficiently trying to pull and inefficiently using the air at that RPM (hence tapering torque/power), but volumetric flow is still the highest at that point.
hmm........
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #20  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Shaun@SG
I believe the point is not peak HP, but peak RPM. The engine may be inefficiently trying to pull and inefficiently using the air at that RPM (hence tapering torque/power), but volumetric flow is still the highest at that point.
The torque curve more or less mirrors Ve. Peak flow occurs at peak hp, because hp is essentially a function of Ve (torque) with respect to rpm. Above the rpm at which peak hp occurs, Ve is dropping off faster than the rpm increases.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 09:05 PM
  #21  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
But let me toss in one little 'monkey wrench'...

What I said just above applies to a normally aspirated engine. With a turbo engine, the hp/tq curves alone may not tell the entire story with respect to Ve and flow. Why? Because a large turbo that spools late may not reach full boost until after the engine's Ve max, so the torque curve may not reflect the actual Ve.

Additionally, a smaller turbo may not reflect the actual point of peak flow in a hp graph because the turbo may run out of steam before point at which Ve begins to drop at a faster rate than the rpm increases. So, the actual air velocity as measured in the IC pipes (which is a product of air volume) may increase somewhat beyond the point at which the MAF begins registering a decrease in air mass (hp).
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #22  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ted B
Peak flow occurs at peak hp, because hp is essentially a function of Ve (torque) with respect to rpm. Above the rpm at which peak hp occurs, Ve is dropping off faster than the rpm increases.
That is the simplified version that does not take into account FMEP. Think about a SEO restrictor plate engine. They can turn the engine higher, and because of increased draw frequency, airflow through the plate is increased but power either stays the same or drops because it is being consumed as friction.

Last edited by Shaun@SG; Sep 5, 2005 at 09:47 AM. Reason: corrected words
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 09:19 PM
  #23  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ted B
What I said just above applies to a normally aspirated engine. With a turbo engine, the hp/tq curves alone may not tell the entire story with respect to Ve and flow. Why? Because a large turbo that spools late may not reach full boost until after the engine's Ve max, so the torque curve may not reflect the actual Ve.
The system is always considered as a whole.. the NA peak charging efficiency point of a TC engine does not need to be found in isolation because the TC engine will never be run NA.

the actual air velocity as measured in the IC pipes (which is a product of air volume) may increase somewhat beyond the point at which the MAF begins registering a decrease in air mass (hp).
This is true.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 05:54 AM
  #24  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Shaun@SG
That is the simplified version ...
It's intended to be.

Originally Posted by Shaun@SG
The system is always considered as a whole.. the NA peak charging efficiency point of a TC engine does not need to be found in isolation because the TC engine will never be run NA.
Maybe, but the efficiency characteristics of the N/A mechanical assembly is important because it allows us to make appropriate decisions with regard to cams, cam timing, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #25  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ted B
Maybe, but the efficiency characteristics of the N/A mechanical assembly is important because it allows us to make appropriate decisions with regard to cams, cam timing, etc.
Like you said, in a TC application the torque peak is a function of valve timing and and boost characteristics. You needn't find the NA torque peak to make decisions on cams or cam timing. If this wasn't the case, then the NA peak torque, or an entire NA torque curve would have been plotted by many people. Do you know where the NA torque peak lies on a stock E8 engine? What does the NA torque curve look like?
Apologies for how short these posts are and for perhaps not being warm or polite.. it's not that I feel that way, it's just I haven't slept for a long time this weekend. I just now realized the tone might be off, after re-reading posts and noting the progression.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #26  
SlowCar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Originally Posted by Ted B
FWIW, I have a very difficult time believing that an $800+ water injection kit is going to equal, much less beat the proven results of the $500 methanol injection kits used by a good few EVOs (including my own). Just FYI.
So far, the shurflo pump, accumulator, the aquamist FiA2/HSV and parts is adding up to $476.82. Its not too bad for having a hybrid system that u know exactly how much water to fuel is injected.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #27  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Shaun@SG
Apologies for how short these posts are and for perhaps not being warm or polite.. it's not that I feel that way, it's just I haven't slept for a long time this weekend. I just now realized the tone might be off, after re-reading posts and noting the progression.
At least you haven't just lost your home and 90% of your personal possessions to massive flooding. Rest assured I have reason to be in REAL bad mood. Get some sleep!

Last edited by Ted B; Sep 5, 2005 at 07:56 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 08:36 PM
  #28  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Oh yes, what a tragedy. Aaron Broussard's public plea was heart wrenching. Everyone please watch the video link off http://www.overspun.com/?p=1549 as well as read what the people have to say below in the comments. Makes me so sad and angry.

Hope your loved ones are ok Ted. I can't imagine what it is like to be working in one of those insurance companies right now. They're probably going to be backed up for years.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Remmz
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
0
Oct 24, 2015 07:37 PM
JUS4SHO
Lancer Audio and Security (All models)
11
Jun 29, 2015 01:47 PM
methkilab
Evo X Show / Shine
2
Jan 4, 2015 09:26 AM
stageup
Evo X General
1
Dec 29, 2014 06:02 AM
REDEVILEVO9MR
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
29
Feb 14, 2007 02:12 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:55 PM.