Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.
View Poll Results: Which do you like?
AMS
24.98%
APS
1.97%
ARC
7.40%
AVO
0.20%
Buschur
23.30%
Ebay Special
3.06%
Garrett
1.58%
GReddy
3.75%
GRE Performance
0.20%
HKS
6.12%
Hyperflow
0.99%
Injen
1.28%
Kensei
0.30%
Nisei
17.87%
Peakboost
1.28%
Perrin
5.13%
Precision
0.69%
Pruven
0.30%
PWR
0.79%
SBR
0.30%
Slowboy
0.79%
Spearco
2.37%
SSautochrome
1.09%
Stock
3.85%
Turbonetics
0.39%
TurboXS
6.61%
Other
4.94%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 1013. You may not vote on this poll

Poll: FMIC - Front Mount Intercooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 04:11 AM
  #286  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
What about the AMS race FMIC? Does anyone know how it compares to Nisei and BR in dimensions, fit, performance, etc?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 04:29 AM
  #287  
ShaunSG's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
Dave is in the process of setting up his AEM to control boost. When you first set up the boost with the AEM you manually input the wastegate solenoid duty cycle into the boost control chart. Then you do a run on the dyno to see what your resulting boost pressure was. With a good load bearing dyno it is pretty easy to dial in your settings. But this is just your "base map" with no compensation for weather conditions or changes in your system (like changing out the FMIC). After you have the base map set up you put in your feedback parameters in a seperate little map in the AEM program.

Hope this helps,

Keith
Ok.. wastgate duty cycle map. Thanks, it is crystal clear.

I will clean out my previous post to David since the question is answered here. Prevents potential answer repeat.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #288  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Wow, this thread is finally dieing off I had to actually search for it rather than hit the top topic

I just found a front bumper support. Mine and Jarrod's cars both have the Race FMIC on them and both of them have the fascia off. My car is however missing the mount that bolts to the actual car as I take off all that crap for weight. Jarrods car has that stuff on it, A/C etc. The bumper support, steel beam, crash bar..whatever you want to call it, DOES fit on his car with NO cutting of the support. It has about a 1/2" clearance at each corner which is where it is tighter.

I personally feel the part is 100% useless and does nothing but tacks 15 pounds on the nose of the car. Depending on the height of the object you gently ran into (in an accident) it could possibly save the FMIC. That steel beam is only about 4-5" tall though, so anything under or below it and you'd be screwed anyway.

I'm a weight saving nut though and am not telling anyone to actually take it off, it's your car.

Just wanted to say for sure the steel beam does not need cut.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #289  
Fourdoor's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 4
From: Rosedale, IN
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Wow, this thread is finally dieing off I had to actually search for it rather than hit the top topic

I just found a front bumper support. Mine and Jarrod's cars both have the Race FMIC on them and both of them have the fascia off. My car is however missing the mount that bolts to the actual car as I take off all that crap for weight. Jarrods car has that stuff on it, A/C etc. The bumper support, steel beam, crash bar..whatever you want to call it, DOES fit on his car with NO cutting of the support. It has about a 1/2" clearance at each corner which is where it is tighter.

I personally feel the part is 100% useless and does nothing but tacks 15 pounds on the nose of the car. Depending on the height of the object you gently ran into (in an accident) it could possibly save the FMIC. That steel beam is only about 4-5" tall though, so anything under or below it and you'd be screwed anyway.

I'm a weight saving nut though and am not telling anyone to actually take it off, it's your car.

Just wanted to say for sure the steel beam does not need cut.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
To me the only reason to keep it is legal reasons, and liability if you are in a sever front end crash. Those are good enough reasons to keep it if you are running the car as a daily driver though. As far as actual protection it is crap. When I was rear ended in my 03 EVO and pushed into the car in front of me (no visible damage to the car in front) the bumper folded like paper and put a hole in the stock FMIC, and this was from a very minor front end bump. But if I run into someone head on and have severe injuries without that tinfoil bumper in place the insurance company can deny my injury claims.... not worth the risk in my book.

Good to hear that the Buschur Racing Race FMIC fits with no modification of the front bumper.

Keith
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #290  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
.

I personally feel the part is 100% useless and does nothing but tacks 15 pounds on the nose of the car. Depending on the height of the object you gently ran into (in an accident) it could possibly save the FMIC. That steel beam is only about 4-5" tall though, so anything under or below it and you'd be screwed anyway.
FWIW, the bumper support is critical to front impact protection. If it were to be removed and the car was involved in even an minor accident, you'd see considerable front end damage. So much, in fact, that an insurance adjuster (upon inspection) is within his rights to deny all or part of the claim. It's just one of those things that require a caveat emptor of sorts. Okay for a race car but might not be acceptable for a regular customer and the compromises that he'd be willing to accept.

my 2c,
shiv

ps. Ha.. Fourdoor beat me to it.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #291  
bbar's Avatar
Newbie
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Newport Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Fourdoor
If getting your intercooler cold and moist once meant it stayed cold and moist forever you would have invented a perpetual motion machine. Every machine is a heat engine of some kind, and if you discover one that violates the laws of conservation of energy you will be a very rich man (or assasinated by the oil companies).
This is wrong (at least the first half). There is no violation of thermodynamics here. If you sprayed down the intercooler with, say, a hose and let it sit in a room where the air did not move and where the pressure, humidity, and temperature were all static, then if it kept getting cooler and cooler, then you would have a violation of the first law of thermodynamics. This is not what’s happening on the car though. Out in the real world, when the car is being driven around, there is wind (a lot of it at that…especially at 100+ MPH). That energy needs to be taken into account. There are pressure differences (that energy also needs to be taken into account). And there are temperature differences between point A and B even if they are only a couple hundred feet apart. There are also relative humidity differences. These variables will energize the system and this energy is further used to cool the air coming into the intercooler.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #292  
taenaive's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 920
Likes: 0
From: Chantilly,VA
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
FWIW, the bumper support is critical to front impact protection. If it were to be removed and the car was involved in even an minor accident, you'd see considerable front end damage. So much, in fact, that an insurance adjuster (upon inspection) is within his rights to deny all or part of the claim. It's just one of those things that require a caveat emptor of sorts. Okay for a race car but might not be acceptable for a regular customer and the compromises that he'd be willing to accept.

my 2c,
shiv
only if accident was declared your fault.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #293  
DizzyTT's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
and if the adjuster knew it was supposed to be there.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 07:55 PM
  #294  
sasquatch's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Left Coast
The crash beam is the item keeping me from getting the IX jdm rear bumper (same principal), unless I can find a shop willing to try and make it fit...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 08:07 PM
  #295  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by DizzyTT
and if the adjuster knew it was supposed to be there.
Every car has a bumper support of some type. Removing it would be awfully obvious for anyone who is trained at body repair/estimates.

shiv
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 09:16 PM
  #296  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
Every car has a bumper support of some type. Removing it would be awfully obvious for anyone who is trained at body repair/estimates.

shiv
Not EVERY car. The JDM EVO does not have the rear bumper support. Whether it has the front or not I don't know. I don't believe it is an integral part of the car's overall structural integrity. You are right about the insurance risk, though.

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 06:56 AM
  #297  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I don't agree about the front inpact at all. I've seen too many wrecked DSM's and EVO's at this point (we are always looking at wrecks to buy) and feel the front impact beam hurts the car more than it does it any good in a light/moderate wreck.

I also don't think the bar would be noticed as missing by the majority of anyone that looked at the car. By the time the adjuster and such usually get around to looking at a car I've scene customer take all kinds of things off a car pulling scams. Not something I'd do but hey......... Something such as that front crash beam if noticed could be blamed on factory install, previous owner of the car or just about anything. I say no way an insurance claim is going to be denied. I've never seen it, heard of it and can't imagine it.

As I said when I typed my OPINION about that beam, it's up to the owner of the car. It was my OPINION same as this is.

Something I've notice about having the beamn in place. That minor accident that bends that beam will also tweak the frame horns in the front, fairly severely. Our black shop car that ran 10.12 @ 141, we bought totalled. Other than the fact that EVO parts are out of this world to replace I don't feel the car would have been totalled had that bumper beam not been in there. The frame rails were damaged pretty bad and was the hardest part of the car to have repaired, my opinion, the body shops opinion was that particular damage occured mostly from the bumper support.

PLEASE leave you front bumper supports on! I'll take mine out, saves me going on a diet

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 10:30 AM
  #298  
Str8Ryda's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I don't agree about the front inpact at all. I've seen too many wrecked DSM's and EVO's at this point (we are always looking at wrecks to buy) and feel the front impact beam hurts the car more than it does it any good in a light/moderate wreck.

I also don't think the bar would be noticed as missing by the majority of anyone that looked at the car. By the time the adjuster and such usually get around to looking at a car
David,

I'm not sure how things operate where you are from but, I was under the impression that the "Adjuster" ONLY comes out AFTER the car has been involved in a collision and a claim has been filed. To basically evaluate and APPROVE the damage claims filed against the insurance company.


Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I've scene customer take all kinds of things off a car pulling scams. Not something I'd do but hey......... Something such as that front crash beam if noticed could be blamed on factory install, previous owner of the car or just about anything.
Interesting scenario... But, I believe in honesty as being the best policy. As well as the safety of my kids and family comes FIRST! (friends also inculded)

Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I say no way an insurance claim is going to be denied. I've never seen it, heard of it and can't imagine it.
Well, personally I'm not as bold as you are and IF I'm going to invest $700 & up on a FMIC. I would definitely want to do my best in protecting that investment. I, unlike you do not have the connections or the resources to build one of your kits... if a replacement was required.

In a minor fender bender, I think I would prefer buying $100 bumper beam support (out of the paper, ebay, whatever, from someone who isn't running one or someone who totaled their ride because they didn't have it. ) rather than destroy my $700 FMIC and losing my investment.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 12:44 PM
  #299  
outlaw620's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: lv desert
[QUOTE] d.buschur ( Our intercoolers ALL work with the stock plumbing if you choose to run it that way.) i ordered a stage 4 kit with race intercooler about 2 1/2 months ago. parts look real nice. was told by nick that i HAD to buy the licp for the race ic and that you (d.b) would have to custom make the licp for an xtra $100 dollars $310 total xtra over the stage 4. then when i talked to you face to face at the evo meet in vegas (SEMA) you said you still have to make the CUSTOM licp? what gives? told you and nick that i didnt want it if i dont need it for i was changing to a 35r. thanks for makin me buy parts i didnt need and then charging me a 100 xtra for CUSTOM WORK. sorry to throw a fit on here but i just about pooped a gasket when i was playing catch up on this thread. DOUG THACKER LEP LAS VEGAS NV.. P.S. DAVE YOU WILL HERE FROM ME THIS WEEK.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #300  
TopLevelPerformance's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (81)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: LI, NY
Originally Posted by Str8Ryda
David,

I'm not sure how things operate where you are from but, I was under the impression that the "Adjuster" ONLY comes out AFTER the car has been involved in a collision and a claim has been filed. To basically evaluate and APPROVE the damage claims filed against the insurance company.



Interesting scenario... But, I believe in honesty as being the best policy. As well as the safety of my kids and family comes FIRST! (friends also inculded)

i dont get what David said has to do with the safety of ur kids and family, he talked about customers doin scams and how people get away with not havin the crashbeam if detected, he mentioned its just an opinion and not to remove it


Well, personally I'm not as bold as you are and IF I'm going to invest $700 & up on a FMIC. I would definitely want to do my best in protecting that investment. I, unlike you do not have the connections or the resources to build one of your kits... if a replacement was required.

In a minor fender bender, I think I would prefer buying $100 bumper beam support (out of the paper, ebay, whatever, from someone who isn't running one or someone who totaled their ride because they didn't have it. ) rather than destroy my $700 FMIC and losing my investment.

Again its his personal race car which i dont think he takes the kids to ballet practice, so regardless of connections. if he or anybody feels to need to lighten the car or do any modifcations hey go for it, he was bold enough ur terms to say its his opinion and not to remove the crash beam
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:49 AM.