Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Who can size these turbos in the correct order??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #61  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by Boosted AWD
A BB 50 trim would make more power but not MUCH more. It is IMHO the ultimate pump gas turbo.
im not a big fan of the 50 trim... i think you would have much better results with a Gt based turbocharger, and that is definately coming from experience!!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 02:41 PM
  #62  
Boosted AWD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Full-Race Geoff
im not a big fan of the 50 trim... i think you would have much better results with a Gt based turbocharger, and that is definately coming from experience!!
Really? Not to sound like an *** but why? I figure a BB 50 trim would make the same power but spool sooner?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #63  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tahiti, French Polynesia
I was set for the 3076R but someone told me the BB 50 trim will be better for me. I will run only on pump gas and want to keep the 264's in my car for better spool. Maybe later I will add Methanol, but not sure yet.

What is exactly the BB 50 trim? it's not a GT turbocharger?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 08:33 PM
  #64  
TwStDeVo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (62)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 0
From: 5o5
Originally Posted by HxllxMan
I was set for the 3076R but someone told me the BB 50 trim will be better for me. I will run only on pump gas and want to keep the 264's in my car for better spool. Maybe later I will add Methanol, but not sure yet.

What is exactly the BB 50 trim? it's not a GT turbocharger?

i would also consider the BREvoIx-20g, seems like the best bang for the buck. i agree with the people that say stick with a stock based turbo or get a 35r, although before the 20g i disagreed. the 20g can produce 1/4 times like the gt30r turbos, if not better, but costs alot less. on the 330whp tune that buschur had, it ran a best time of 11.3, which is amazing considering this tune can be done on pump gas. when they tuned it on race gas and got 376whp, i think they can dip into the 10s, which the gt30r cars usually cant unless they use nitrous.

i was very close to purchasing a 3076r kit, but the numbers most people get from it seems like its not worth the money. i am still open to see if there is a reason to get the 3076r over the ix-20g, but so far i cannot come up with one. good luck with whatever turbo you choose.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 09:20 PM
  #65  
HxllxMan's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
From: Tahiti, French Polynesia
Originally Posted by TwStDeVo
i would also consider the BREvoIx-20g, seems like the best bang for the buck. i agree with the people that say stick with a stock based turbo or get a 35r, although before the 20g i disagreed. the 20g can produce 1/4 times like the gt30r turbos, if not better, but costs alot less. on the 330whp tune that buschur had, it ran a best time of 11.3, which is amazing considering this tune can be done on pump gas. when they tuned it on race gas and got 376whp, i think they can dip into the 10s, which the gt30r cars usually cant unless they use nitrous.

i was very close to purchasing a 3076r kit, but the numbers most people get from it seems like its not worth the money. i am still open to see if there is a reason to get the 3076r over the ix-20g, but so far i cannot come up with one. good luck with whatever turbo you choose.
Yo!

I see you didn't decide either on your turbo . To be honest If I was living in the USA, I will get the BR 9-20G. I think those turbo are great but only if you get proper tuning ( and maybe pretty aggressive one ).

I live in Tahiti and looking for "easy" Hp with safe tune on pump gas. So the BR 9-20 ain't a good choice for me. But to be honest I want to experience a bigger turbo than 9-20G... but wich one? that's the question
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 01:32 PM
  #66  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
Originally Posted by Boosted AWD
Really? Not to sound like an *** but why? I figure a BB 50 trim would make the same power but spool sooner?
the biggest reason to use a GT turbo over the 50 trim, is that you get a tremendously advanced compressor wheel and turbine wheel technology as well as a MUCH stronger/durable center section for only slightly more money. The BB 50 trim is more than likely a thrust washer based bearing turbo, and is not a true stainless steel dual ball bearing center section.

whoever is telling you to use a BB 50 trim has obviously not compared it to a GT turbo of similar size!!!!
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 03:00 PM
  #67  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Geoff, if I wanted a turbo that had similar spoolup to the 3071R (60mm wheel, .63AR), with the ability to hold more power on the top-end (93 Octane application), what would you recommend?

I'm leery of stepping up to a 3076, because the spoolup of my 3071, while acceptable, is already a little bit laggier than I thought it would be. So now that Garrett has downsized the 3071, it seems that there is a gap, so-to-speak in their turbo lineup.

l8r)
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2006 | 03:53 PM
  #68  
Geoff Raicer's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 0
From: NJ / AZ FULL-RACE
i would recommend trying out a .82 a/r housing... you may find that the lag does not increase at all, yet top end increases significantly, particularly if using a properly designed long runner merge collector manifold and a properly designed downpipe



Originally Posted by Ludikraut
Geoff, if I wanted a turbo that had similar spoolup to the 3071R (60mm wheel, .63AR), with the ability to hold more power on the top-end (93 Octane application), what would you recommend?

I'm leery of stepping up to a 3076, because the spoolup of my 3071, while acceptable, is already a little bit laggier than I thought it would be. So now that Garrett has downsized the 3071, it seems that there is a gap, so-to-speak in their turbo lineup.

l8r)
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 03:29 AM
  #69  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
AMS made 490whp on a plain bearing 50trim. this was on a PTE .48 exhaust housing. This was on a dsm setup that ran an adapter plate bolted to a stock exhaust manifold. Full spool was at 3500rpm, 490tq.

The 3076 may make 600whp maxed out. but for a 500whp setup I prefer to use the 50 trim. I have used both and the 3076 is laggier. full boost at 4000. The single bb turbo that turbonetics makes is also more robust design than the dainty garrett daul bb. It has all the same spool advantages. The bb is only needed on the compressor side. This is where the thrust surface is. the thrust surface is like a disc brake, that is where the friction is. The bb eliminates the thrust plate.

I stand by my recommendation from someone who has experience with both turbos.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 03:37 AM
  #70  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
I also dont feel 'tremendously advanced" is a good term for the garrett turbos. We are talking about fan blades. Not that difficult to desgn. they were perfect designs 30 years ago. And garrett balistic concept turbos were designed twenty years ago. They are not new. Just recently marketed.

I would stick with your 3071 the way it is. I have done back to back swaps from .63 to .82 housings and have seen nothing gained in horsepower only a 400 rpm spool loss. This was done at the 450hp level where an .82 is of no benifit. The .82 will be needed to squeeze 600whp.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #71  
Jaylenospoolboy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
From: Burbank
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
The 3076 may make 600whp maxed out. but for a 500whp setup I prefer to use the 50 trim. I have used both and the 3076 is laggier. full boost at 4000. The single bb turbo that turbonetics makes is also more robust design than the dainty garrett daul bb. It has all the same spool advantages. The bb is only needed on the compressor side. This is where the thrust surface is. the thrust surface is like a disc brake, that is where the friction is. The bb eliminates the thrust plate.

I stand by my recommendation from someone who has experience with both turbos.
How do you get to 600 WHP when Garrett states the 30R's will only make up to 500 crank hp? Am I missing something?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #72  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
Originally Posted by Jaylenospoolboy
How do you get to 600 WHP when Garrett states the 30R's will only make up to 500 crank hp? Am I missing something?
Nos.. lol j/k
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 10:32 AM
  #73  
Brianb's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
So now that Garrett has downsized the 3071...
l8r)
A little help here... what do you mean by Garrett downsizing the 3071?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 10:34 AM
  #74  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
Originally Posted by Brianb
A little help here... what do you mean by Garrett downsizing the 3071?
They are using a 56mm wheel instead of 60mm turbine wheel. Which just happens to be similar to a HKS 2835R .
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #75  
WrX Kila's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
From: NyC
Get a gt42r with a 1.05 back housing.... full boost should be around 6379rpm. (LOL)
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:49 AM.