Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Who can size these turbos in the correct order??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 02:37 PM
  #16  
Boosted AWD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
here are the turbos I consider relevant

2005 Ev0 16g

evo IX stock

IX 20G by Buschur

Gt35R

Gt42R

Given the way the GT35 and IX turbos work - I would not personally consider any Gt30 based unit of a 50 trim
What is wrong with the 3076R or the BB 50trim? I figure they would be the ultimate street turbos for someone sticking with the stock bottom end and 500WHP or less? Wouldn't they be better for daily drivers?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 05:06 PM
  #17  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
Originally Posted by fromWRXtoEVO
I am familiar to Mitusbishi turbos sizes since I had upgraded multiple of my cars in the past to upgraded mitsubishi turbos

I think your information about the 16G and the 20G is a bit off, as I mention before the Big 16g flows about 550CFM and a 20G flows 650CFM @15PSI, this means that the difference in flow is 15.6%.

The reference that you use about 40lbm and 43 lbm would give you a 6.98% increase. I know Mitsubishi turbos fairly well, I have had my car turbos in the past upgraded to:

91 GSx with a Evo III turbo
90 Laser to a Big 16G
91 Stealth TT from 9bs to 13G turbos
03 WRX to 18G reverse thrust impelers

These are a few links to address my point:

http://www.turboclub.com/makes/mit/S...CNMTURBOS.html

http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/arch.../t-278517.html

http://forums.clubrsx.com/archive/in.../t-256688.html

my .2c
maybe you need to read a little closer. but i will expand just for you.
small 16g flows 505cfm or 34lb/min
big 16g flows 575cfm or about 38lb/min
18g flows 600cfm or about 40lb/min
evo 3 16g flows 625cfm or about 42lb/min
evo 8 16g flows 625cfm or 42lb/min
20g flows 650cfm or 43.7 lb/minute.


there are three different 16g wheels coming from the dsm line of turbos. the evo8 is reverse rotation and is a mirror image of the evo 3 16g dsm turbo. but who on this board really cares about the dsm turbos anyway. only the 20g wheel is worth knowing about since it is the only one that flows more than the evo16.

Last edited by 94AWDcoupe; Jan 2, 2006 at 05:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 07:18 PM
  #18  
rraulston's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,038
Likes: 0
holy .....you guys are killing me. The shop is ready to order me the turbo and i told him to wait another day. I already paid for it. I think both you guys are truly knowledgable......But it doesnt help me get it right the first time!!! Thanks for the input......i dont want a monster turbo. Just total effeciency at 425-450 HP. If i get a GT, ime outa cash for the injectors and wastegate. Freaking FULL-RACE stuff is expensive......but NICE!!!!! So 50 or 57.....or get another POS 35r.........
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 07:35 PM
  #19  
jj_008's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,064
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR
IMHO, a GT3071 is what you want. If price is an issue then go w/ a 50trim over the 57trim. As TedB stated, the surge on the 57 trim would be aweful on an EVO.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #20  
SlowCar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Originally Posted by rraulston
holy .....you guys are killing me. The shop is ready to order me the turbo and i told him to wait another day. I already paid for it. I think both you guys are truly knowledgable......But it doesnt help me get it right the first time!!! Thanks for the input......i dont want a monster turbo. Just total effeciency at 425-450 HP. If i get a GT, ime outa cash for the injectors and wastegate. Freaking FULL-RACE stuff is expensive......but NICE!!!!! So 50 or 57.....or get another POS 35r.........
lol! poor ray!
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:11 AM
  #21  
Drifto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 809
Likes: 2
From: Alabaster, AL
Originally Posted by Ted B
Not a good choice for an EVO. That 60-1 is intended to run low boost pressure on a higher compression V8. It's peak efficiency range is around 12psi, which makes it a poor choice for our application
Not true. Look at an FP Red. I know many people that have this turbo and It makes great power at higher boost. There is a guy in Huntsville I know that has run 10's on this turbo in a full weight street car. He runs 30psi. I had another friend that made 540whp with a red at 24psi. He made 440whp on pump gas at 18psi. I ran a T3-T4, 60-1 stg3 on my Galant and was very strong. It didn't spool until 4.5k though which I thought was a little laggy. Full boost was around 5k. That being said it was also on my turbo E36 M3. With stock compression at 10.5:1 and boost a 8.5psi it made 385whp. I'm not arguing that theoretically it's for low boost high compression because it does kick *** for that. I just saying that from what I've seen, specs on paper don't always dictate real life.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 06:22 AM
  #22  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Drifto
Not true.
Yes, it is true, because it was designed by Garrett specifically to be that way:

http://www.pagparts.com/Garrett_Turb...ype=t460-1trim

Your argument is like saying that because someone made good power with a 2.5" exhaust on an EVO that it's equal to a 3", and that isn't the case.

Does it mean that the turbo cannot deliver good power? No.

Does it mean that a better suited turbo will give better power potential at the same settings? Absolutely.

One can only know what he has and cannot know what he's missing . . . unless of course he makes a swap and sees the difference.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 07:27 AM
  #23  
BadazzCR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
here are the turbos I consider relevant

2005 Ev0 16g

evo IX stock

IX 20G by Buschur

Gt35R

Gt42R

Given the way the GT35 and IX turbos work - I would not personally consider any Gt30 based unit of a 50 trim
x2... eighter keep it stock or go big, all the middle turbos are a waste of time IMHO.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #24  
Boosted AWD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
x2... eighter keep it stock or go big, all the middle turbos are a waste of time IMHO.
Originally Posted by Dynoflash
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
here are the turbos I consider relevant

2005 Ev0 16g

evo IX stock

IX 20G by Buschur

Gt35R

Gt42R

Given the way the GT35 and IX turbos work - I would not personally consider any Gt30 based unit of a 50 trim



What is wrong with using the GT30R namely the 3076R and the 3071R? People are making good spool and the 76R makes 500WHP on pump and alky?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #25  
Mikey52's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
From: WV
Originally Posted by Boosted AWD
What is wrong with using the GT30R namely the 3076R and the 3071R? People are making good spool and the 76R makes 500WHP on pump and alky?
Absolutely nothing. I dont understand the 'go big or dont upgrade at all' mentality. Some of us want moderate power levels (400-500whp) without the lag of an enormous turbo. This is something that the 50 trim and GT30 series turbos provide.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:33 PM
  #26  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by Boosted AWD
What is wrong with using the GT30R namely the 3076R and the 3071R? People are making good spool and the 76R makes 500WHP on pump and alky?
IMO it all depends on the intended use of the car:

stock 2.0l block - Evo IX turbo, 3071 are good upgrades, especially for street use/road racing. The 3076 is somewhat laggy and 35r and larger are really laggy.

built 2.0l block - 3071 is almost too small, runs out of steam up top (i.e. past 8000 rpms). The 35r and 42r can really shine for drag racing on this platform - as demonstrated by AMS and others.

2.3/2.4 stroker - street/road racing: 3071 will spool really early, very potent as RRE has demonstrated. A 3076 and 35r are also very potent. Hell, anything short of the stock turbo is potent on a stroker.

l8r)
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #27  
sleet's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,197
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
Originally Posted by BadazzCR
x2... eighter keep it stock or go big, all the middle turbos are a waste of time IMHO.
Exactly, which is why i'm leaving it stock and saving up for the GT35R.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:40 PM
  #28  
Boosted AWD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
IMO it all depends on the intended use of the car:

stock 2.0l block - Evo IX turbo, 3071 are good upgrades, especially for street use/road racing. The 3076 is somewhat laggy and 35r and larger are really laggy.

built 2.0l block - 3071 is almost too small, runs out of steam up top (i.e. past 8000 rpms). The 35r and 42r can really shine for drag racing on this platform - as demonstrated by AMS and others.

2.3/2.4 stroker - street/road racing: 3071 will spool really early, very potent as RRE has demonstrated. A 3076 and 35r are also very potent. Hell, anything short of the stock turbo is potent on a stroker.

l8r)

Sean IV is running past 8500 on a stock Head stock bottom end Evo VIII with a 35R.


I still have my heart set on a GT3076R and getting a nice power band from 4000-8000+
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:49 PM
  #29  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by Boosted AWD
Sean IV is running past 8500 on a stock Head stock bottom end Evo VIII with a 35R...
I've got my fuel cut set to 9100 rpms right now and have run the turbo to about 9000 rpms on occasion, but with the stock gearing and how fast the 3071 falls off, it is pointless to rev past 8200 rpms.

Originally Posted by Boosted AWD
.. I still have my heart set on a GT3076R and getting a nice power band from 4000-8000+
That should be no problem at all. Pick your cams wisely, though.

l8r)
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 12:51 PM
  #30  
Boosted AWD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
272's ok? They are already in.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:42 PM.