Evo IX Turbo vs VIII Turbo
Originally Posted by razorlab
Turbos start to spool way before 2500 rpm...
This is just data to show that a turbo starts spooling way before 2500 rpm.
As far as some of these mentions of peak spool on IX's, I have no logs for IX's so I have no idea.
This is just data to show that a turbo starts spooling way before 2500 rpm.
As far as some of these mentions of peak spool on IX's, I have no logs for IX's so I have no idea.
With my gears set at -2/-2 and the mods mentioned in the post, I took the following log from my MAP sensor.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...0&postcount=20
(graph and data file included)
My gears are now set to +1/-1, but I haven't done the spool analysis again just yet.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...0&postcount=20
(graph and data file included)
My gears are now set to +1/-1, but I haven't done the spool analysis again just yet.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Doesn't matter what the article says. VIIIs who have installed IX turbos have lost a few hundred rpm spool. What does that tell you?
Originally Posted by trinydex
tells me they likely reetarded their cams gears
well did they? i'm just sayin that's the first thing that comes to mind. i haven't stalked all the evo9 turboed 8s out there... let's see the examples you speak of and let's see why there is more lag, is that fair? i'm guessing that the reason is for retarded cam timing.
notice with pd1's data (which is the best kind of data, map sensor logged with rpm). he has 264s which should be "torque monster" cams but he has them retarded, look his boost doesn't come on fully until like 3700. does that make sense? the cam gear settings seems to have an effect.
of course there's other factors too, tuning and tuning in conjuction wtih cam gear settings all matters.
notice with pd1's data (which is the best kind of data, map sensor logged with rpm). he has 264s which should be "torque monster" cams but he has them retarded, look his boost doesn't come on fully until like 3700. does that make sense? the cam gear settings seems to have an effect.
of course there's other factors too, tuning and tuning in conjuction wtih cam gear settings all matters.
No, they didn't even have cam gears. I'm talking changing the turbo and nothing else and then retuning - later spool each time. We don't have MANY examples yet, though, so it's a limited data set.
in any case, it's not like it'd be surpising... it's running the 10.5 and a larger comp wheel which adds a hair of mass.
but the question is what are you comparing to? a 9 turbo even tme will never outspool a 9.8 equipt turbo.
but the question is what are you comparing to? a 9 turbo even tme will never outspool a 9.8 equipt turbo.
most of the tme data comes from teh vishnu camp... they claim 100-200rpm improvement. the 9.8 has about that much over a 10.5 so it just cancels. which is also what the original design description stated.
now with a larger comp wheel and a slightly revised diffuser design, you're prolly gonna break even again. the mag wheel will give a lotta improvement though. a lot meaning again prolly in the <500rpm range.
but think... you're getting all the power and almost none of the spool loss and if you take a bit of a hit in spool it's very little. keep in mind that to this day there's not an aftermarket turbo that can spool faster than a stocker varient and do as well on pump gas.
if people wish to call me out on hype... then i'll say of course i hype it, that's an amazing accomplishment that mitsu has made.
now with a larger comp wheel and a slightly revised diffuser design, you're prolly gonna break even again. the mag wheel will give a lotta improvement though. a lot meaning again prolly in the <500rpm range.
but think... you're getting all the power and almost none of the spool loss and if you take a bit of a hit in spool it's very little. keep in mind that to this day there's not an aftermarket turbo that can spool faster than a stocker varient and do as well on pump gas.
if people wish to call me out on hype... then i'll say of course i hype it, that's an amazing accomplishment that mitsu has made.
I don't think any disagrees on the quality of the stock-style turbos on the Evo. It is a great combo of power, spool, and all-around power/torque.
However, my one problem is you mentioning the magnesium wheel. I thought that was only the JDM version. Don't we have standard internals in the USDM IX turbos?
However, my one problem is you mentioning the magnesium wheel. I thought that was only the JDM version. Don't we have standard internals in the USDM IX turbos?
Originally Posted by razorlab
100-200rpm improvement?? How can any human feel that difference?
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I don't think any disagrees on the quality of the stock-style turbos on the Evo. It is a great combo of power, spool, and all-around power/torque.
However, my one problem is you mentioning the magnesium wheel. I thought that was only the JDM version. Don't we have standard internals in the USDM IX turbos?
However, my one problem is you mentioning the magnesium wheel. I thought that was only the JDM version. Don't we have standard internals in the USDM IX turbos?
Originally Posted by trinydex
huh? no, i said if you DON'T have the magnesium wheel, as someone suggested that they may be running in japan due to the failures and having to sort them out, then that's the turbo you want. all the 9 all the ti none of the mag.
"now with a larger comp wheel and a slightly revised diffuser design, you're prolly gonna break even again. the mag wheel will give a lotta improvement though. a lot meaning again prolly in the <500rpm range. "
Didn't see any reference to JDM versions or failures or NOT having the mag wheel. It sounded like you were trying to suggest that someone in this conversation was getting a JDM IX, which I didn't see in the context of the last page.






