Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BLOWN motor Part 2 (upper end pics)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #31  
C6C6CH3vo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,223
Likes: 4
From: sc
When I bought my car it had 18 miles on it.

In the prior 18 miles a salesman can start the car on a ice cold morning and, without warmup, send it up to the rev limit in all the gears. Now that abuse I feel would make the engine out of tolerance and prone to blowing.

Makes me wonder
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 08:44 PM
  #32  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Some info on how rod bolts are tested for strech



The proper way to tighten rod bolts is to measure the strech to determine the proper "pre load"

A bolt that has deformed by a permanent increase of .001 " more than standard should be replaced

The way to check the rod bolts is to take the load off the fastner and measure the length comapred to a new one

If the fastner has increased in length it has streched out and would result in a lower pre load than specified

The problem is if the fastner streches after it is originally installed then the pre load would be too low on the rod cap


Many people do not realize how critical ROD BOLTS are

Here is some info from ARP on this subject
Pre-Load

Finally, although not a design parameter, the subject of bolt installation preload must be addressed. It is a fundamental engineering concept that the force in a bolt in an ideal preloaded joint will remain equal to the preload until the externally applied force exceeds the preload. Then the force in the bolt will be equal to the external force. This means that fluctuating external forces will not cause fluctuating forces in a preloaded bolt as long as the preload exceeds the external force. The result is that fatigue failure will not occur.

In a non-ideal joint, such as in a connecting rod, the bolt will feel fluctuating stresses due to fluctuating rod distortions. These are additive to the preload, so that fatigue could result. In connecting rods, precise preloads are required because if they are too low, the external forces (the reciprocating weights) will exceed the preloads, thus causing fatigue. If they are too high, they provide a high mean stress that combines with the fluctuating stresses due to rod distortion. Again, fatigue is promoted. The objective, then, is to preload a bolt so that it just exceeds the external load, and no higher.

To sum up: both insufficient preloads and excessive preloads can lead to fatigue failures.

More info is on the tech notes of this page




The part # for the replacement 8 mm stock rod bolts is 107-6002



Summit Racing sells it for $36.99 and they will take you a half day to install youself

Last edited by DynoFlash; Mar 9, 2006 at 08:54 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 08:49 PM
  #33  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
Some info on how rod bolts are tested for strech



The proper way to tighten rod bolts is to measure the strech to determine the proper "pre load"

A bolt that has deformed by a permanent increase of .001 " more than standard should be replaced

The way to check the rod bolts is to take the load off the fastner and measure the length comapred to a new one

If the fastner has increased in length it has streched out and would result in a lower pre load than specified

The problem is if the fastner streches after it is originally installed then the pre load would be too low on the rod cap
al do you install rod bolts and do you fallow this guide. also $$$ for install.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 08:53 PM
  #34  
evo-boy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
good luck on getting the car back to normal
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #35  
56Hotrod's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
From: SC
Thanks Al. I went to ARP's site and they have 2 different PNs for the bolts...this is the info I wanted. And thanks for the summit link...I'll check into that.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 09:29 PM
  #36  
Saikou_kun's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: ARIZONA
Originally Posted by Greg K
with labor including the valves and a valve job I would estimate approx 6-8K. The turbo should probably be replace too because there was a lot of metal bits that went out through the exhaust valves and throught the hotside of the turbo when that popped.

Wow ! That is less than a quote I have seen for a more with less damage.
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 11:15 PM
  #37  
FahKen Evo!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Al you once stated that you looked at your stock bolts and they were very worn. How do you check for wear on these bolts?


Thanks Al. 37 for bolts is very cheap.


Hey Al, if you combine ARP Head studs and Rod bolts, is it safe to rev till 8000++++?
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 11:21 PM
  #38  
DynoFlash's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 16,850
Likes: 0
From: 2003 Evo VIII - Silver
Originally Posted by FahKen Evo!
Al you once stated that you looked at your stock bolts and they were very worn. How do you check for wear on these bolts?


Thanks Al. 37 for bolts is very cheap.


Hey Al, if you combine ARP Head studs and Rod bolts, is it safe to rev till 8000++++?

the rod bolts deal with the stress of high rpms

The head studs deal with high thermal loads and high cyl pressures that try and push or lift the head

The real common theme is that they are both strech style fastners designed to hold down under a pre load.


With a set of rod bolts and upgraded valve springs and retainers you shoulod be able to do 8,000 but no more with the stock rods
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:23 AM
  #39  
CarFanatic's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
While I would certainly respect your thoughts about this situation, I would like to tell you that the past three years of experience with evos have shown that a bone 100% stock evo is just as likely to have an engine failure as one with a few minor upgrades

of course with a completely totally stock car you will not have any warranty concerns if it blows up

As for the saftey of mail in flashes, myself and other tuners have been offering them and there are several thousand out there with only a few individual failures. Most importantly, this one and the others can not be related to the tuning of the mail in flashes. I have over 2500 ecu flashes out there with no tuning realeted failures and only a few that experienced this kind of rod bearing problem. This percentage is similar to that of 100% stock cars which is to be expected.

In fact, for those who are modifying an evos with modifications that are typical (known as "basic performance upgrades" BPU) such as intakes, exhausts and boost controllers the fact is that running without a proper tune to match your modifications is more dangerous than running with a properly set up tune.
I"m not saying there to blame in fact you did the flash on my 03 evo. I just feel safer having it on a dyno and knowing what its doing. I plan on visiting you at buschur as soon as I get the parts I want on the car before the tune
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #40  
SuperHatch's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,044
Likes: 0
From: NJ
So is there enough room for a stretch gauge when trying to do this in the car?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 07:05 AM
  #41  
Stew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by 56Hotrod
Question for Stew. You're the 1st owner of this car I take it. How many miles were on the car when you picked it up? I've heard some bad stories about test drives.
The car had 496 miles when it was delivered to me. The last 300 were from an older gentleman that delivered me the car from NH. As far as I was told, it was a car Mitsubishi brought around to a few 'shows'. Other than that I have no history of its first 200 miles.

Originally Posted by Greg K
with labor including the valves and a valve job I would estimate approx 6-8K. The turbo should probably be replace too because there was a lot of metal bits that went out through the exhaust valves and throught the hotside of the turbo when that popped.
I'd estimate more than that.. It looks like the intake valves left through the exhaust passageway, and left a good # of dings in the head on their way out. Looks like a valve job with a machine job on the head. The turbo most likely ate 3 intake valves, that's another $2500 from Mitsu. The block is absolutely shot, not sure the price tag on that though (with oil pan). The transmission case is cracked, so that needs to be replaced, and they also need to fix my 5th gear synchro while they are in there. Plus labor (if it is warrantied, otherwise no labor required) which will be a good amount of time @ $79.90 per hour.

a tad over $10,000 maybe?
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #42  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
If you're checking for permanent stretch (which is indicative of a failed bolt), the bolt must obviously be un-torqued. I suppose you could do it with the rod in place if you really wanted to do it without removing the rod/piston. The gauge can be used with an assembled block.

FWIW, there are two schools of thought with respect to rod bolt torque. Some say just torque to a specified stretch. Others say torque to a specified torque reading, at which point the specified stretch should be attained. My hunch is the latter is correct, as if a bolt happens not to stretch uniformly (which implies a defect), that means uneven torque between it and its sister bolt.

Last edited by Ted B; Mar 10, 2006 at 07:11 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 07:20 AM
  #43  
AndyBandy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 27
From: Frederick, MD
what is the ETA on mitsu's decision??
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #44  
poormansracecar's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally Posted by C6C6CH3vo
When I bought my car it had 18 miles on it.

In the prior 18 miles a salesman can start the car on a ice cold morning and, without warmup, send it up to the rev limit in all the gears. Now that abuse I feel would make the engine out of tolerance and prone to blowing.

Makes me wonder
I wonder the same thing too friend. Mine had 196 miles (said they drove it from Orlando).
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 07:35 AM
  #45  
Stew's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: CT
*********DECISION FROM MITSUBISHI*********

Just talked to the service manager, who talked to the district representative, who got this information from Mitsubishi:

They are DENYING the warranty work due to "PRE-DETONATION".

My first comment was, "there is no such thing as pre-detonation. Its either pre-ignition or detonation. "

Who's seen 'Malibu's Most Wanted'??? "I got Game Cast." , "uh, its either Game Cube, or Dream Cast, whatchu got?" "I SAID GAME CAST MOTHER F*CKER"

..Anyway, atleast Mistu did not care about anything to do with over-revving (which did NOT happen anyway).

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does anyone else see any signs of Detonation there??? Pre-ignition??? I'm about to eat a $15,000 bill.. would like to make sure its legit.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 AM.