Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

BR 20G-9 vs. BR GT35R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
Levar's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
BR 20G-9 vs. BR GT35R

I've been at the crossroads for quite some time between the BR 20G-9 vs. BR GT35R turbo upgrade for my '03 VIII. Just when I was certain that the GT35R was the prime candidate, I come across this thread started by Mr. Buschur himself about the 20G-9 pulling 2.14 seconds faster in third gear between 3K-7K RPM than the GT35R. I think my head's been in the ground because I've focused only on power (dyno) numbers. I'm looking for some serious unbiased advice here. I know that I can get the two-stage launch ability through Dynoflash meaning that either the 20G-9 or the GT35R would already be spooled and ready to be unleashed. I don't go to the track very often and I'm hoping to fall somewhere in the 350-400whp mark until I finish paying the car off and then I want to shoot for the 450-500whp mark. Does the 20G-9 have the capability of reaching 450-500whp or should I spend the $1600 difference and purchase the GT35R from the "get-go"?

Thanks

Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #2  
Invoice EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 708
Likes: 0
From: Elizabethtown, KY
Tough decision huh. I went through the same thing . Just look at my sig and you'll see the path I took .
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #3  
Ev9lution's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Yeah I think the 20g is capable of that power, but you'll more than likely need to run meth or a race fuel of some sort. You'll need more mods than the ones in your sig to get 450-500 whp though.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 11:28 PM
  #4  
lbcevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 392
Likes: 2
From: Sherman Oaks, CA
450-500 WHP from a 20G-9, are you sure about that? Is it physically capable of flowing that much air? I was torn between the BB 50 Trim and 20G-9 and ended up getting the 50 Trim, partly because upgrading to a bigger turbo (e.g. 35R) is simple and cheap this way.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #5  
Ev9lution's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
You would more than likely need everything done though, like cams, intake manifold, race head and internals lol.... and the gas of course higher octane
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 11:56 PM
  #6  
FahKen Evo!'s Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pure_evo
I've been at the crossroads for quite some time between the BR 20G-9 vs. BR GT35R turbo upgrade for my '03 VIII. Just when I was certain that the GT35R was the prime candidate, I come across this thread started by Mr. Buschur himself about the 20G-9 pulling 2.14 seconds faster in third gear between 3K-7K RPM than the GT35R. I think my head's been in the ground because I've focused only on power (dyno) numbers. I'm looking for some serious unbiased advice here. I know that I can get the two-stage launch ability through Dynoflash meaning that either the 20G-9 or the GT35R would already be spooled and ready to be unleashed. I don't go to the track very often and I'm hoping to fall somewhere in the 350-400whp mark until I finish paying the car off and then I want to shoot for the 450-500whp mark. Does the 20G-9 have the capability of reaching 450-500whp or should I spend the $1600 difference and purchase the GT35R from the "get-go"?

Thanks

That was from 3K, the GT35 doesn't spool at 3K, it spools up at 4200 and will hold boost to 9000+ RPM's. The Buschur 20G is very nice and gives you torque, but the GT35R will make well over 100WHP more and have better topend by far, but you give up the low end. The 35R will hold over 35PSI if you ask it while the 20G cannot. On a stock 03 Evo block expect to make 450WHP max on race gas with a 20G, the GT35R can almost hit that on pump gas, on race gas you can get 550+WHP on the GT35R having the stock bottom end bing your limit, if you built a 2.0 motor expect well past 600WHP with a GT35R.

The 20G is an AWESOME street turbo, losing very little spoolup so your gona keep all your low end torque. If you just going to run pump gas, stick with the 20G, it;ll make great power and is very streetable. Running race gas and Alky the GT35R will make BIG BIG power for sure but it still lags.

Last edited by FahKen Evo!; Mar 13, 2006 at 12:06 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 12:05 AM
  #7  
IEXCELR8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Buscherpowered on this site ran an 11.3 at the track with a 20g on a stroker motor, he has more in it as he was only running 23lbs of boost on race gas.

On an 03 you will need to shell out much more cash than on a ix in my opinion.
I had AEM ems/turbo back/DP/ BC/HFC- and put out 333/333 on TTR dyno.

If I went the 35r route I would have to build my car to rev to 9k to take advantage of the power band.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 12:23 AM
  #8  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
You should sit in a car with the 35R... im sure it would change your mind once the turbo starts to sing. My car is tuned at 29psi and it is scary fast... Dont worry about turbo lag and when full boost hits. Once it reaches 4000rpm and above it pulls like crazy and just doesnt stop....remember anything over 4k the turbo is pushing so much more power so even if your not at full boost the car is still hauling ***.... Before I bought the 35R I kept looking at dyno graphs to see when full boost hits but when you actually drive it you will know full boost dont mean anything....to me it doesnt. Yes a smaller turbo will get a head jump if you are both at 3k rpm and start to go at it but in about 3 seconds time you will destroy him.

What is your goal and what is it you want from your car?
1. "dam this turbo is fast" get the 20g-9
2.OMFG holy $hit- get the 35R

this is my opinion.

BTW I have not been in a Evo with the 20-9 but my friend does have the HKS 3037 turbo on his Evo 8.

Last edited by Derek888; Mar 13, 2006 at 12:28 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:48 AM
  #9  
sleet's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,197
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Lauderdale
35/37r Ftw.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 07:09 AM
  #10  
Big Boost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: In my house
Here is another overview from David himself:


https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=169638
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:27 AM
  #11  
ct9a gsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 593
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, Ga
On a serious note... when racing, when do you *ever* start at 3k rpm... from a roll or dig? Buschur's test was nice to compare the lag and power of both turbos... but not exactly for realistic use.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:31 AM
  #12  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
Originally Posted by ct9a gsr
when racing, when do you *ever* start at 3k rpm... from a roll or dig?
from a roll.. btw that was just an example if you were to run both cars at 3k rpm.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:44 AM
  #13  
twinscrewed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: PA
I was worried about the lag of a Gt35R because i'd never been in a car with one. I decided to go with it anyway (was originally going with a GT30), and i'm glad I did. The lag is not nearly as bad as its made out to be. No way i'd go back to a smaller turbo.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 08:48 AM
  #14  
95GSXtoEVO8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: RI
Originally Posted by FahKen Evo!
The 20G is an AWESOME street turbo, losing very little spoolup so your gona keep all your low end torque. If you just going to run pump gas, stick with the 20G, it;ll make great power and is very streetable.
I disagree with the above. It has been suggested (pretty sure by Buschur himself but not 100% positive) that the 20g will not make substantially more power on pump gas than a 10.5 16g, it will spool a little slower too. The 20g will however hold higher boost better when run on race gas or alky/meth injection, and that is where it will shine over the 16g.

To the above poster, I would wait until we see more 20g cars running at the track before making a decision.

Last edited by 95GSXtoEVO8; Mar 13, 2006 at 07:06 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #15  
95GSXtoEVO8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: RI
Originally Posted by twinscrewed
I was worried about the lag of a Gt35R because i'd never been in a car with one. I decided to go with it anyway (was originally going with a GT30), and i'm glad I did. The lag is not nearly as bad as its made out to be. No way i'd go back to a smaller turbo.
Do you have an AEM EMS? If so I think that is key to getting decent spool up on a gt35r turbo. So I think that is something that the original poster should consider in his $1600 dollar difference.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:09 AM.