Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Dynopack dyno compared to other dynos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 06:59 PM
  #1  
kiddevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Long Island N.Y.
Dynopack dyno compared to other dynos

How does a dynopack dyno read compared to dyno jet and mustang dyno ?400whp on dynopack how much on other dynos ? Just a rough idea.
THANKS

Last edited by kiddevo; Apr 24, 2006 at 07:02 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 08:59 PM
  #2  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
There are no direct comparisons, but they read pretty close to Dynojets. I've seen one Evo do a little more on a Dynapack than on a Dynojet in the same area with the same mods, but the numbers were fairly close.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #3  
S-1's Avatar
S-1
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
i have a excel spreadsheet from a few years back that shows the "approx" number differences given a certain desired flywheel hp number. pm or email me with your email address if you want it.
Here's a quick comparison from what the sheet shows though:

AWD Dyno Dynamics: 1.42 Driveline Loss Multiplier
AWD Dynapack: 1.30 Driveline Loss Multiplier
AWD Mustang: 1.60 Driveline Loss Multiplier
AWD Dynojet: 1.19 Driveline Loss Multiplier

For example: if you have 300 whp on a dyno jet, you multiply 300X1.19 to get 357 flywheel hp.
There are obviously many factors involved with these numbers though. Like how the dyno was initially set up, etc. But somebody must have done a little homework before putting this together.
Enjoy
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 10:33 AM
  #4  
EvoTech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 1
From: Long Island
WHP should be close but I think that torque is measured much differently and the numbers are never SAE corrected for torque. (I think).
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #5  
kiddevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Long Island N.Y.
Originally Posted by EvoTech
WHP should be close but I think that torque is measured much differently and the numbers are never SAE corrected for torque. (I think).
From what i have seen torque was pretty high on dynopack compared to other dynos.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #6  
scott88vr6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: UTAH
The dynapack I dyno on reads just a bit higher than the Mustang Dyno I have been on around here. They are very close in numbers.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:21 PM
  #7  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Correct me if I am wrong but wouldnt it make sense if they read a little higher even if similar due to the lack of rotating weight supplied by the wheels?

Scorke
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alsong2002
Cobb AccessPORT
5
Apr 5, 2014 03:59 PM
damien666
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
12
May 16, 2013 04:45 PM
damien666
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
8
Feb 22, 2013 05:49 PM
Srt4...
Evo General
11
Jul 23, 2008 06:33 PM
gsrmin
Northwest Region
26
Feb 15, 2006 12:59 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.