Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

19psi to redline safe??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 10:02 PM
  #16  
TearItUpSports's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX (NW)
The other thing to consider is where the boost is being measured. If you are talking about the manifold, you are right. 18psi is 18 psi no matter how it gets there.

If you read the boost at the turbo outlet as I think the Evo does, then all things may not be equal. Larger turbos also usually have larger outlets and are also fitted with larger intercooler pipes. A larger cross section at 18 psi flows a lot more air than 18 psi with a small cross section.
You would see the difference at the manifold though, which also takes into account intercooler efficiency and several other factors that determine the final number.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2003 | 11:00 PM
  #17  
dlowman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Originally posted by TearItUpSports
Do we know what the compression difference between the two cars is going to be? That will make a huge difference on hp as well. The big difference is that in one car you have 2.5 l of 14.5 psi air, and in the other you have 2l of 19 psi air. Total amount of air wins.

The turbo comment is correct too. The same psi is not the same air flow in different turbo's. One thing though, is that I am not sure that the STI turbo is any larger than the Evo. In fact I think it is smaller. I don't believe though that it can efficiently reach 19 psi, so those who think you can just boost the STI are mistaken. It won't get there.

Once again though, both are awesome cars. You need to look at the whole package of each, because picking apart pieces will get you nowhere. If you can actually get one of these cars, you are going to be more than happy, and to those not getting them, it shouldn't be an issue.
Compression ratio for the sti is 8.2:1
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 12:19 AM
  #18  
dmora's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally posted by twdorris

I thought about ignoring this, but decided what the heck. 18psi on a 2 liter motor is 18psi on a 2 liter motor. As long as the two turbos aren't completely out of their efficiency ranges, they'll both fill 2 liters with the same amount of air at 18psi. Going from a decent sized t3/t4 running 18psi on my 4g63 to a t88 running 18psi on my 4g63 isn't going to add 400 hp. Displacement is the limiting factor there.

[edit]Upon reflection, I've decided I may have misread dmora's post slightly. If he's talking about the original comparison between 14.5 psi on a 2.5L motor to 19psi on a 2.0L motor, then his statement is at least partially valid. You have to consider displacement in that comparison and you have to consider turbo efficiency. But I still object to the t3/t4 at 18psi compared to a t88 at 18psi generating +400 hp on the same motor.[/edit]

Thomas Dorris
the way i made my response was just to show extremes. But the point i was trying to make is still valid. You cant compare different turbos and different engine setups as directly as the original post intended. Every turbo's compression map and efficiency range is different. one turbos ability to make equal power at less boost pressure is a direct example of its efficiency at compressing and expelling an engine's given displacement.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 06:54 AM
  #19  
twdorris's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, MD
Originally posted by dmora
one turbos ability to make equal power at less boost pressure is a direct example of its efficiency at compressing and expelling an engine's given displacement.
Excellent. I'm glad to see a technical forum staying technical for a change.

Originally posted by TearItUpSports
If you read the boost at the turbo outlet as I think the Evo does
FWIW, I don't believe the US EVO8 actually measures boost. I don't see a pressure sensor in the circuit diagram that would be useful for that. So it's either using a "duty cycle at RPM" table for the wastegate solenoid to "get close" or it's using airflow per rev with some guess at volumetric efficiency to calculate boost. Or, I guess, it could just be relying on system design limitations to naturally limit the pressure. In any case, I'm a little surprised to not see a useful pressure sensor going into the ECU.

Thomas Dorris

Last edited by twdorris; Apr 13, 2003 at 06:56 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 05:45 PM
  #20  
dmora's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally posted by twdorris

FWIW, I don't believe the US EVO8 actually measures boost. I don't see a pressure sensor in the circuit diagram that would be useful for that. So it's either using a "duty cycle at RPM" table for the wastegate solenoid to "get close" or it's using airflow per rev with some guess at volumetric efficiency to calculate boost. Or, I guess, it could just be relying on system design limitations to naturally limit the pressure. In any case, I'm a little surprised to not see a useful pressure sensor going into the ECU.

Thomas Dorris
i would tend to agree. Its much easier to program in an algorithm into the ECU than it is to add lines and connect it to a gauge.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 07:40 PM
  #21  
I4K20C's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Can som1 plz tell me what kind of turbo is in the evo then? The STi you guys said uses a T3/T4 or w.e.? What does the Evolution 8 use then? I'm sorry for my ignorance.. but just trying to understand..
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 07:45 PM
  #22  
dlowman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Originally posted by I4K20C
Can som1 plz tell me what kind of turbo is in the evo then? The STi you guys said uses a T3/T4 or w.e.? What does the Evolution 8 use then? I'm sorry for my ignorance.. but just trying to understand..
No one really knows what the sti is running for its turbo yet. It is a new ihi vf3? something ball bearing type that was specifically designed for the new 2.5 i am sure more details will be out about it soon. We orginally thought it was going to be a vf34 but we were wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 07:53 PM
  #23  
I4K20C's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
How about the Evolution 8..what does taht use then?

Basically waht i was wondering.. since the car came out was that.. I understand that if you use a small turbo.. you need to run higher boost to get the same power of a big turbo... So basically is Mitsubishi's turbo small or big?

B/c im guessing if the STi runs 14.5 (on some forum they said that was mentioned on the STi microsite when you dl the Pf article) then it has a big turbo....

Therefore if the E8 is running at 19psi i thought it had a small turbo.. but no1 would answer my question so i jus forgot about it.. maybe the question is dumb or something..lol... but i jus want to know..

btw thanks dlowman for helping...

Yeah so basically does the Lancer Evolution 8 use a big or small turbo?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 08:01 PM
  #24  
dlowman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
The evo uses a twinscroll 16g turbo. Yes it is a smaller turbo and your assumptions are right the turbo on the sti is a bigger turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #25  
I4K20C's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
oh man thanks alot..lol..finnaly got my question answered... that puts my mind at ease.... thanks alot..
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 08:10 PM
  #26  
dmora's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally posted by I4K20C
Can som1 plz tell me what kind of turbo is in the evo then? The STi you guys said uses a T3/T4 or w.e.? What does the Evolution 8 use then? I'm sorry for my ignorance.. but just trying to understand..
I just used t3/t4 as an example... i have no idea what it uses.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2003 | 08:13 PM
  #27  
dmora's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally posted by I4K20C
maybe the question is dumb or something..lol... but i jus want to know..

btw thanks dlowman for helping...

Yeah so basically does the Lancer Evolution 8 use a big or small turbo?
There are no dumb questions, only unasked ones.

Originally posted by dlowman
The evo uses a twinscroll 16g turbo. Yes it is a smaller turbo and your assumptions are right the turbo on the sti is a bigger turbo.
ditto.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 10:44 AM
  #28  
ShapeGSX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 1
T3/T4 doesn't really denote any particular size.

The 16G isn't a small turbo by any means. It is larger than the stock turbos on most any other vehicle.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 11:13 AM
  #29  
dlowman's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Originally posted by ShapeGSX
T3/T4 doesn't really denote any particular size.

The 16G isn't a small turbo by any means. It is larger than the stock turbos on most any other vehicle.
But "smaller" then the sti turbo which is what my comment meant.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
VRP
Evo General
15
Mar 24, 2014 04:43 AM
EvoIXPilot
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
1
Apr 12, 2013 09:56 AM
racer135
ECU Flash
8
May 3, 2008 07:57 AM
nj1266
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
5
Nov 3, 2007 07:00 AM
fuzzychi
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
13
Dec 17, 2004 07:43 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:20 AM.