Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

2.0 or 2.3 for highway runs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #31  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
Go ask Sean Ivey what motor he runs .

2.1L + 10:1 is very possible with boost. With that high of a compression you don't NEED crazy boost. For example:

1.) The 2.1L already has more displacement than a 2.0L. So boost for boost, compression ratio vs. compression ratio, the 2.1L will outflow the 2.0L given the same turbo and relatively same sized head/head ports.

2.) Now given that info, raise the compression and you dont HAVE to run high boost, you can make relatively the same kind of power on lower boost.

3.) Given the rod anglularity of a 2.1L *longer rod, "shorter piston"* you can rev it higher without problems of the piston getting stuck on the bottom "skirt" of the block -problems 2.3L have. Also if you deck the head and place the proper headgasket, your chances of the piston hitting the valves is nearly extinct.

Now take that 2.1L with 10.0:1 c/r and put a HIGH flowing head and you have practically a Honda on steroids. Tell me how 2.1L + 10.0:1 c/r isn't efficient.

Also, I understand your POV in that, that high of a compression ratio will not work well with pump gas and it'll detonate/preignite, but with the proper fueling and tuning it's very possible to run daily.

Last edited by inco9nito99; Jun 4, 2006 at 04:09 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 04:09 PM
  #32  
evokw's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: .....
Originally Posted by Ted B
But how is that octane rating obtained? Be careful, as I'll bet it isn't the same. 98 pump octane in Europe is less than 98 pump octane in the U.S., and it is different elsewhere as well.

The U.S. pump octane is obtained this way:

Research Octane + Motor Octane / 2.

Taiwan may very well rate it differently (e.g. Research octane only), so do not automatically assume that 98 octane in Taiwan is the same as the 98 octane in the U.S.

From Answers.com:

"In most countries (including all of Europe and Australia) the "headline" octane that would be shown on the pump is the RON, but in the United States and some other countries the headline number is the average of the RON and the MON, sometimes called the Anti-Knock Index (AKI), Road Octane Number (RdON), Pump Octane Number (PON), or (R+M)/2. Because of the 10 point difference noted above, this means that the octane in the United States will be about 4 to 5 points lower than the same fuel elsewhere: 87 octane fuel, the "normal" gasoline in the US and Canada, would be 91 in Europe."


Chances are your '98 octane' in Taiwan is the equivalent of 93 octane ('pump gas') in the U.S. Be advised!
Thats exactly right, took the words right out of my mouth
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #33  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by inco9nito99
1.) The 2.1L already has more displacement than a 2.0L. So boost for boost, compression ratio vs. compression ratio, the 2.1L will outflow the 2.0L given the same turbo and relatively same sized head/head ports.
A '2.1L' 4G64 is 72cc larger than a 2.0L 4G63. That amounts to a difference of 3.6% - hardly enough to write about.


Originally Posted by inco9nito99
2.) Now given that info, raise the compression and you dont HAVE to run high boost, you can make relatively the same kind of power on lower boost.
This is a misconception, and is incorrect. Compression is not a substitute for boost. Increasing boost increases the air mass being processed by the engine. Greater air mass = greater power. Increasing compression does not increase air mass, only how hard the mixture is being squeezed. An increase in compression by one full point (e.g. 9:1 to 10:1) typically increases off boost torque by ~5%, but the tradeoff in the reduced boost pressure the higher compression motor can tolerate creates a much larger reduction in power potential.


Originally Posted by inco9nito99
3.) Given the rod anglularity of a 2.1L *longer rod, "shorter piston . . .
AFAIK, the 2.1L does not employ a shorter piston than a 2.0L 4G63, but it does use a 6mm longer rod.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #34  
inco9nito99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,917
Likes: 0
From: Roselle, IL
The rod just sits higher inside the piston making the pivot point higher up.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 04:34 PM
  #35  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Rcebowl
i think of highway being apart of street... i really dont race on the street much... too many dangers.. anyways... look at Chris with his black evo .. most of his races go past 120mph and thus past'd 4th and into 5th and it does AWESOME on highways..
One can spin a 2.3L 4G63 as high as his pockets are deep.


Originally Posted by Rcebowl
but after 600+whp longer gears are better imo...
Gearing is a key factor in this discussion. Gearing is what makes a 2.0L engine better suited for drag racing. Change the gearing, and change the determining factors in the discussion.


Originally Posted by Rcebowl
imo a 2.3 is a much better street/highway and daily car... and 2.0 is a much better drag car
What I am iterating here is the same qualities that make the 2.0L EVO the desired setup for drag racing apply to 'highway runs'.


Originally Posted by Rcebowl
now the 2.1 i know a lot less about.. why is there a big push for 2.1 all of a sudden? the 2.1 are 4g63's with the 4g64 crank? ... how would a longer stroke be good for rev's?
A 2.1L is a 2.0L crank in a 4G64 block, so the stroke is the same. The bore is only slightly larger, but the rod/stroke ratio is a little more favorable to high rpm efficiency.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #36  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by inco9nito99
The rod just sits higher inside the piston making the pivot point higher up.
If the rod is 6mm longer to make up for the 4G64's 6mm increase in deck height, the piston pin position is the same as the 2.0L.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 07:14 PM
  #37  
brandon's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke
should we also take into consiration that the stock tranny hates to shift at higher rpms......????
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:50 PM
  #38  
Derek888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
I know 98 octane here is the same as 93 octane in the US Besides myself there are quite a few people boosting 2 bar on pump gas. AFAIK im the only person running meth in this country....also race gas is illegal here.

The stock tranny should be fine shifting at 8k I hope since I dont plan on going higher than that anyways...
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2006 | 09:51 PM
  #39  
althemean's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 1
From: Phoenix
I think the rod length of the 2.1L is 162mm. That is 12mm longer than the stock rod which is 150mm. Or do I have the stock rod length wrong?

link to SBR site for the 2.1L destroker kit
http://www.slowboyracing.com/shop.ph...74ed55cfff34e5
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:12 AM
  #40  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
Originally Posted by Derek888
I know 98 octane here is the same as 93 octane in the US Besides myself there are quite a few people boosting 2 bar on pump gas. AFAIK im the only person running meth in this country....also race gas is illegal here.

The stock tranny should be fine shifting at 8k I hope since I dont plan on going higher than that anyways...
If you don't rev past 9.5k,then go to 2.3.Spin 2.3 to 8k is ok.If you want to max out your GT35R and high rev than 2.0,go to 4G64 and use SBR Destorke kit,this could make you spin to 10k .For tranny,ask Shep or TRE.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 01:59 PM
  #41  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Here we go again with the 10K nonsense.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #42  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Yes, I wish those who promote such practices would dare step forward to guarantee their advice with a blank check.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 03:14 AM
  #43  
Derek888's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
Originally Posted by value
Here we go again with the 10K nonsense.
the kid is 12 years old
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 08:03 AM
  #44  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
I think its a no brainer... 2.3L. We're talking about highway runs and what better example to go buy than the black AMS EVO? GT35R, 2.3, 8k redline (not too crazy) and you saw what it could do.

Take it a step further and add the ShepRacing 4.11 final drive upgrade (made specifically for strokers) and youre all set. Even if your racing from 5k, the stroker is going to spool better and pull harder most of the way. I know a 2.3L is headed my way someday...
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #45  
evo8_m3's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: CT
with 35R turbo... hows the turbo lag comparison between 2.1\2.2\2.3L ? will it be the same ?

some say with the 2.3L it reduces the lag of about 400rpm, but will this be the same as the the other stroker ?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:39 AM.