does ne 1 have the CC brand 6 puck clutch installed in their evo and if u do can u tell me wat u think of it.

this is a link to a website that sells the clutch. the one that i have is the stage 4 or the stage 4+ i am not quite sure which one it is. also can some1 tell me how to tell if it is sprung or non sprung bc that will tell me if it is 4 or the 4+.

http://www.philsinc.com/competitionclutch.html

thanks

 

no 1 has this clutch?!?!?!?!? is it that new or has no1 heard of it?

 

bump

 

Never heard of it.....post a link to their product...that might help.

 

bump for ne info

 

Competition Clutch is not new (maybe 2-3 years). Chris Jewel is the owner. He used to work for Clutch Masters. He was the face to Clutch Masters that everyone saw on the import performance side of the business, like a Sales Manager/Promoter of sorts while guys like Mike Lee at CM did the product development, and Greg (the owner) financed it. Looking at his new brand, the product is similar to what Clutch Masters sells. He changes the geometry of the pressure plate, has a variety of friction materials and uses Quartermaster twin discs (stage 6). I won't comment on the product's quality because I honestly don't know enough about it. I am not trying to dog on their product but the percentage of increase in the advertising is let's just say "largely inflated". There is no way IMO they are getting a 150-200% increase in torque capacity with their stage 3 for instance. So if the stock clutch can handle 250 ftlbs, then their stage 3 can handle 625-750 ftlbs? Uhh.... sure. That is down right hilarious to me!

 

i ran a stage 2 from them in my civic when it was n/a...worked great for me..good enough for me to try out one of their twin disc clutches on my newest turbo setup

 

act man wat do u think about their ironman clutch setup that is a 6 puck cerametalic disc? i am also gonna pm u with some other questions that i have for u if u dont mind.

 

I really don't think it is appropriate for me to publicly give my opinion of the competitor's product. That would be tacky and besides I haven't tested their product the way we do with ours. All I would have is an opinion based from observation, not real test results. I am not saying that I don't have an opinion...

 

ok thats fair enough but i guess thats wat pms r for