Automatic Evo
Originally Posted by lowbdgtmechanic
anyways the Automatic EVO i know is the Evos from GT3, GT4, NFS 1, 2 & Most Wanted. no such thing in reality.
http://www.globalcar.com/showroom/au...art/152471.htm
I didn't even know the X was gonna have that. That's badass!
I don't want an automatic. It's actually for my buddy. He wants something very original and loves the Evo 8/9. To each his own.
I can drive a manual. It's got some pep too.
Besides... brake boosting? That's soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sexy!
So I guess i'll give AMS or Buscher a call... see whats up. Thanks anyway. But guys... stop bashing and think about it. Automatics = Boost off Line! Oh god... :-)
I don't want an automatic. It's actually for my buddy. He wants something very original and loves the Evo 8/9. To each his own.
I can drive a manual. It's got some pep too.
Besides... brake boosting? That's soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo sexy!
So I guess i'll give AMS or Buscher a call... see whats up. Thanks anyway. But guys... stop bashing and think about it. Automatics = Boost off Line! Oh god... :-)
If you want boost "off the line", you're much better off working out an anti-lag system!
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/165294..._acceleration/
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/165294..._acceleration/
Wow, bunch of ignorance in this thread.
Think for a moment... say you're an avid Evo fan and you happen to get into an accident where you lose your lower half. The only way you'd be able to drive again is with an auto. Now think about this thread...
Oh yea... to all you anti-auto fan boys.... I hate to tell you... but auto's are faster than manuals.
Think for a moment... say you're an avid Evo fan and you happen to get into an accident where you lose your lower half. The only way you'd be able to drive again is with an auto. Now think about this thread...
Oh yea... to all you anti-auto fan boys.... I hate to tell you... but auto's are faster than manuals.
And a sequential manual is faster than a traditional automatic.
It's symantics really.
In my opinion, and anti-lag system is going to be the easiestand most cost-effective way to get spool/boost right off idle on an Evo.
It's symantics really.
In my opinion, and anti-lag system is going to be the easiestand most cost-effective way to get spool/boost right off idle on an Evo.
Last edited by Mike@Forge; Jul 31, 2006 at 05:51 PM.
Originally Posted by bolsen
Wow, bunch of ignorance in this thread.
Think for a moment... say you're an avid Evo fan and you happen to get into an accident where you lose your lower half. The only way you'd be able to drive again is with an auto. Now think about this thread...
Oh yea... to all you anti-auto fan boys.... I hate to tell you... but auto's are faster than manuals.
Think for a moment... say you're an avid Evo fan and you happen to get into an accident where you lose your lower half. The only way you'd be able to drive again is with an auto. Now think about this thread...
Oh yea... to all you anti-auto fan boys.... I hate to tell you... but auto's are faster than manuals.
He is kinda looking for special sponsors and all that jazz. He thinks that going this route will help him. I sorta think he's right!
Razorlab is right. I swear half some of the people on here speaking out of their asses.
It features Mitsubishi's highly acclaimed INVECS II five speed automatic with Formula 1 style gear change buttons on the steering wheel. The interior is much more luxurious than before too, take a look through the features here on the site and find out.

It features Mitsubishi's highly acclaimed INVECS II five speed automatic with Formula 1 style gear change buttons on the steering wheel. The interior is much more luxurious than before too, take a look through the features here on the site and find out.

Last edited by vboy425; Jul 31, 2006 at 05:58 PM.
A properly built auto is faster then a manual in some applications. But those applications aren't Evos. We aren't RWD domestics and we can't swap a Chevy Powerglide in with a Ford 9 inch to go lay down monster times.
Still, there are a few succesful built 1G autos out there. The only way I could see this happening is if you sourced a VII GT-A's trans or tried building up an Outlander AWD box and swap it in.
Still, there are a few succesful built 1G autos out there. The only way I could see this happening is if you sourced a VII GT-A's trans or tried building up an Outlander AWD box and swap it in.
Originally Posted by Mike@Forge
And a sequential manual is faster than a traditional automatic.
It's symantics really.
In my opinion, and anti-lag system is going to be the easiestand most cost-effective way to get spool/boost right off idle on an Evo.
It's symantics really.
In my opinion, and anti-lag system is going to be the easiestand most cost-effective way to get spool/boost right off idle on an Evo.
Originally Posted by GPTourer
A properly built auto is faster then a manual in some applications. But those applications aren't Evos. We aren't RWD domestics and we can't swap a Chevy Powerglide in with a Ford 9 inch to go lay down monster times.
Still, there are a few succesful built 1G autos out there. The only way I could see this happening is if you sourced a VII GT-A's trans or tried building up an Outlander AWD box and swap it in.
Still, there are a few succesful built 1G autos out there. The only way I could see this happening is if you sourced a VII GT-A's trans or tried building up an Outlander AWD box and swap it in.
I'm just messing... I am sure it's possible and would be quite sick. I am going to call AMS tomorrow. I will definitely post what they tell me!
something that nobody mentioned is that the GTA version of the EVO (auto gearbox) has less torgue than the normal Evo. I guess the auto gearbox cannot handle the power of the engine...
I ll try to find specific info and post it...
I ll try to find specific info and post it...
PDF brochure of LANCER EVO VII GT-A
http://www.xtreme-uk.net/Xtreme-EvoVIIGTA.pdf
my previous claim for less torgue is absolutely correct!
Quick Specs
Engine: 4 cylinder, turbo charged 1997cc
BHP: 272bhp @ 6,500rpm
Torque: 253ft/lbs @ 3,500rpm
0-60mph: 5.5secs
http://www.xtreme-uk.net/Xtreme-EvoVIIGTA.pdf
my previous claim for less torgue is absolutely correct!
Quick Specs
Engine: 4 cylinder, turbo charged 1997cc
BHP: 272bhp @ 6,500rpm
Torque: 253ft/lbs @ 3,500rpm
0-60mph: 5.5secs






