2.4 block and Evo head?
Originally Posted by SBR INC
As promised, more will come as we have more stock, but here we go... sorry pics are so big, damn IT guy!
Mahle - 85.5 mm 2.3l
Wiseco K596M85 - 85 mm 2.3l
Wiseco K596M855 - 85.5mm 2.3l
Wiseco K596M86 - 86 mm 2.3l
Wiseco Custom 2 - 87 mm 2.1l De-stroke 9:1 HD forging
Wiseco K595M85 - 85 mm 2.0l
Wiseco Cutom 1 - 87 mm 2.1l De-stroke 9:1 standard forging
Wiseco K595M855 - 85.5mm 2.0l
Stock Evo
Mike Huml
Mahle - 85.5 mm 2.3l
Wiseco K596M85 - 85 mm 2.3l
Wiseco K596M855 - 85.5mm 2.3l
Wiseco K596M86 - 86 mm 2.3l
Wiseco Custom 2 - 87 mm 2.1l De-stroke 9:1 HD forging
Wiseco K595M85 - 85 mm 2.0l
Wiseco Cutom 1 - 87 mm 2.1l De-stroke 9:1 standard forging
Wiseco K595M855 - 85.5mm 2.0l
Stock Evo
Mike Huml
How is it that the Mahle pistons can be more than 100 grams lighter than the Wiseco pistons which are the same size except for a 2l rather than a 2.3l? Not only is that a significant difference, it is scary.
I know Mahle makes excellent motorcycle and auto pistons but how well do they stand up to abuse vs. Wiseco? If your building a 700 crank HP engine, which would you reach for first?
I may be making a new piston choice from now on.
Thanks again.
Originally Posted by TEC
Excellent work!
How is it that the Mahle pistons can be more than 100 grams lighter than the Wiseco pistons which are the same size except for a 2l rather than a 2.3l? Not only is that a significant difference, it is scary.
I know Mahle makes excellent motorcycle and auto pistons but how well do they stand up to abuse vs. Wiseco? If your building a 700 crank HP engine, which would you reach for first?
I may be making a new piston choice from now on.
Thanks again.
How is it that the Mahle pistons can be more than 100 grams lighter than the Wiseco pistons which are the same size except for a 2l rather than a 2.3l? Not only is that a significant difference, it is scary.
I know Mahle makes excellent motorcycle and auto pistons but how well do they stand up to abuse vs. Wiseco? If your building a 700 crank HP engine, which would you reach for first?
I may be making a new piston choice from now on.
Thanks again.

They have always had the lightest set up available, it is my impression that they will not hold up to 700 plus WHP, but we will see... the STI should be at least 600 plus.. so....
Right now, I am still a Wiseco fan (unless Mahle proves to me otherwise!)
Ps.. oil squirter debate is way out of hand, maybe we should machine two sets per hole so we can run more timing advance.....
Mike Huml
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
Yeah they are completely pointless. I guess you have an engineering degree and know much better than the Mitsubishi engineers right? 

So quick to forget.
Mike Huml
Originally Posted by SBR INC
I am putting Mahle in my STI right now, so I will report back on what type of abuse they will handle!
They have always had the lightest set up available, it is my impression that they will not hold up to 700 plus WHP, but we will see... the STI should be at least 600 plus.. so....
Right now, I am still a Wiseco fan (unless Mahle proves to me otherwise!)
They have always had the lightest set up available, it is my impression that they will not hold up to 700 plus WHP, but we will see... the STI should be at least 600 plus.. so....
Right now, I am still a Wiseco fan (unless Mahle proves to me otherwise!)
What thickness are the ring lands comparative to the Weisco? If a forged piston is going to give up that is usually the first place that it's going to happen.
Also, do you have any weights for the Ross and CP pistons. I'm wondering if either are as light as the Mahle piston.
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
Yeah they are completely pointless. I guess you have an engineering degree and know much better than the Mitsubishi engineers right? 

So far, every rationale that you have given us either defies the basics of the way a mechanical engine operates or is based upon your total conjecture.
Lets summize where you have been wrong so far. They don't do anything for engine compression, they don't keep any item from wearing out prematurely, and they don't allow for more ignition advance or prevent detonation/preignition either.
Lets put this in a nutshell. Either tell us what the engineers know that we don't or drop it, PLEASE.
READ:
http://www.isuzucv.com/engines/4h_feat_pistons.html
http://www.pontiac.com/divisional/ne...s_solstice.jsp
http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/...ent_051806.htm
http://www.pbase.com/stealthfti/lblock
http://www.itepsa.com/Detail.bok?no=1362
http://www.fluent.com/solutions/automotive/ex240.pdf
http://kb-silvolite.com/article.php?action=read&A_id=64
http://www.iitk.ac.in/erl/abstract/a..._manibijoy.pdf
http://www.elsbett.com/us/elsbett-di...ng-system.html
http://salesmanual.deere.com/sales/s..._internal.html
http://www.isuzucv.com/engines/4h_feat_pistons.html
http://www.pontiac.com/divisional/ne...s_solstice.jsp
http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/...ent_051806.htm
http://www.pbase.com/stealthfti/lblock
http://www.itepsa.com/Detail.bok?no=1362
http://www.fluent.com/solutions/automotive/ex240.pdf
http://kb-silvolite.com/article.php?action=read&A_id=64
http://www.iitk.ac.in/erl/abstract/a..._manibijoy.pdf
http://www.elsbett.com/us/elsbett-di...ng-system.html
http://salesmanual.deere.com/sales/s..._internal.html
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
READ:
http://www.isuzucv.com/engines/4h_feat_pistons.html
http://www.pontiac.com/divisional/ne...s_solstice.jsp
http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/...ent_051806.htm
http://www.pbase.com/stealthfti/lblock
http://www.itepsa.com/Detail.bok?no=1362
http://www.fluent.com/solutions/automotive/ex240.pdf
http://kb-silvolite.com/article.php?action=read&A_id=64
http://www.iitk.ac.in/erl/abstract/a..._manibijoy.pdf
http://www.elsbett.com/us/elsbett-di...ng-system.html
http://salesmanual.deere.com/sales/s..._internal.html
http://www.isuzucv.com/engines/4h_feat_pistons.html
http://www.pontiac.com/divisional/ne...s_solstice.jsp
http://www.gm.com/company/gmability/...ent_051806.htm
http://www.pbase.com/stealthfti/lblock
http://www.itepsa.com/Detail.bok?no=1362
http://www.fluent.com/solutions/automotive/ex240.pdf
http://kb-silvolite.com/article.php?action=read&A_id=64
http://www.iitk.ac.in/erl/abstract/a..._manibijoy.pdf
http://www.elsbett.com/us/elsbett-di...ng-system.html
http://salesmanual.deere.com/sales/s..._internal.html
Well done!
Now try it again and reference something that has to do with forged internals.
- Not diesel engines which have very large piston to wall clearances which are you can hear them slap around in the cylinders. Unless you plan on putting one in an EVO.
- Not GM Ecotech engines or other engines that they produce with cast pistons.
*You see forged piston have this thing called a forced pin oilers which you don't see alot of in stock engines with cast pistons. So maximum oiling is designed into the piston
*Cast pistons are made with a totally different material with totally different properties than forged so yeah oil squirters may be a good thing. So apples and oranges
- Not someones opinion as stated on their homemade webpage (I can find you one that will tell you that aliens are walking among us)
- Certainly not from a BS company webpage trying to sell their latest gizmo (the words Air Tornado come to mind)
Thanks and have a nice day!
Ummm...forged internals expand when heated. If you wish to discuss the use of piston cooling further, go to this already posted thread:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ight=squirters
I apologize for going off topic, but I still think the squirters are important for high thermal loads (even when using forged pistons). If anyone else has any comments on oil jets and piston cooling, please post in the above thread.
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ight=squirters
I apologize for going off topic, but I still think the squirters are important for high thermal loads (even when using forged pistons). If anyone else has any comments on oil jets and piston cooling, please post in the above thread.
could you add this to the original post?
for the 4g64 block to evo head, you can use the factory evo timing belt, but its really tight. then degree the cams to the crank with the adjustable gears (appx.-4*/-4*).
the water pump is the biggest issue imo.
most companies provide an "adapter plate" (errr plasma cut sheetmetal) that doesnt work very well. basically the block water passage on the 4g64 is larger than the evo h2o pump housing. so, i fastened the pump housing down on my welding bench and welded more aluminum in this area of the pump housing to create a larger "flange" and cover the exposed water passage. then using a silicone injected paper gasket material, made a custom gasket.
works like a charm.
i can tell you from experience that the "adapters" don't work very well. i can change the water pump on our car in about 45 min now lol
Ken
edit: as far as the 00-03 eclipse, i think the issue is the actual block casting(engine mount, ac mount, ps mounts) being different, not sure though.
i do know that the Lancer rally art model 2.4L mivec sohc block works perfect.
the water pump is the biggest issue imo.
most companies provide an "adapter plate" (errr plasma cut sheetmetal) that doesnt work very well. basically the block water passage on the 4g64 is larger than the evo h2o pump housing. so, i fastened the pump housing down on my welding bench and welded more aluminum in this area of the pump housing to create a larger "flange" and cover the exposed water passage. then using a silicone injected paper gasket material, made a custom gasket.
works like a charm.
i can tell you from experience that the "adapters" don't work very well. i can change the water pump on our car in about 45 min now lol
Ken
edit: as far as the 00-03 eclipse, i think the issue is the actual block casting(engine mount, ac mount, ps mounts) being different, not sure though.
i do know that the Lancer rally art model 2.4L mivec sohc block works perfect.

Isn't the Lancer Ralliart 2.4L with Mivec, the 4G69 motor? Are you saying that the Seventh Generation Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart with a 4G69 2.4 L SOHC MIVEC I4 actually works?? This engine comes from the factory with an 87mm Bore and 100mm Stroke. Please confirm! I think this 2.4L engine was available in North America from 2004-2006. Is it possible that Mitsu made this block with heavier cylinder liners, as the bore just seems to be getting larger and larger.



