Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Stock turbo + Cosworth Head

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #1  
Dboey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Stock turbo + Cosworth Head

Anyone running the stock turbo + Cosworth head or equivalent, care to give some feedback on this type of set up. 10q
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 09:29 AM
  #2  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
That would be a completely worthless setup. Cosworth head is for big turbos and big big power.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 11:52 AM
  #3  
RenoEvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Reno, NV
^^^^+1

That would be the biggest waste of money in the history of modding evos.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #4  
sonicnofadz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,726
Likes: 3
From: Baltimore, MD
This would be like owning a ferrari and feeding it low octane gas. Why use such an expensive head with a worthless turbo? If you want to stick with the stock turbo, spend your money on other things (intake, exhaust, hotside, cams, boost controller, tuning, race gas, tuning, etc.). The cosworth head even on larger turbos really won't make much more power than the stock head (i.e. huge waste of freaking money)
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #5  
4ringturncoat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: MI
You would get some gains with the head but not much. I ran a BR stag. 3 head on a stock turbo for a short period of time and the et's were pretty good (11.90's over two years ago was pretty fast for the stock 04 turbo) for the old stock 9.8 turbo. I would guess 10-15hp at the most on the stock turbo. You would be far better off using the money on a BR stage 4 package.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 05:23 PM
  #6  
jbrown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
this would be worthless, unless you like how quickly your stock turbo spools up and want as much power as possible and a stealthy stock look.

I say go for it! And when you upgrade to a 20G-9 you'll really be rippin!
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
Dboey's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 4ringturncoat
You would get some gains with the head but not much. I ran a BR stag. 3 head on a stock turbo for a short period of time and the et's were pretty good (11.90's over two years ago was pretty fast for the stock 04 turbo) for the old stock 9.8 turbo. I would guess 10-15hp at the most on the stock turbo. You would be far better off using the money on a BR stage 4 package.
Thank you guys for your views. Presently my car set up are:

1) Ralliart intake pipe with HKS Super Flow filter
2) Ralliart Intercooler piping with Nisei Intercooler
3) Walbro Fuel pump, 1000cc fuel Injectors & Autronic ECU
4) HKS 264 Cams, HKS Cam gears, HKS valve springs & retainers
5) HPI turbo outlet, HPI 3" downpipe, Mines straight convertor and HKS Silent Hi-Power Exhaust
6) Stock Evo 8MR titanium 10.5 turbo

On the Dyno Dynamics, I am getting 292BHP & 416Nm at the wheels running at 1.65 bars with 98 Octane. My question here is what will be the gains like if I am going to upgrade to a Cosworth head. 10q
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:10 AM
  #8  
-=SPECTRE=-'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Secret Volcano Island
I doubt you would gain much.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:15 AM
  #9  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by Dboey
Thank you guys for your views. Presently my car set up are:

1) Ralliart intake pipe with HKS Super Flow filter
2) Ralliart Intercooler piping with Nisei Intercooler
3) Walbro Fuel pump, 1000cc fuel Injectors & Autronic ECU
4) HKS 264 Cams, HKS Cam gears, HKS valve springs & retainers
5) HPI turbo outlet, HPI 3" downpipe, Mines straight convertor and HKS Silent Hi-Power Exhaust
6) Stock Evo 8MR titanium 10.5 turbo

On the Dyno Dynamics, I am getting 292BHP & 416Nm at the wheels running at 1.65 bars with 98 Octane. My question here is what will be the gains like if I am going to upgrade to a Cosworth head. 10q
Youre going to lose low end and midrange punch and get some minimal gains up top since you have the stock turbo.

Judging from your mods, you like to spend money on things you dont need, such as valve springs/retainers which are completely unnecessary with what you have. Also, 1000cc injectors are way overkill but I guess thats OK if you plan to upgrade in the future. Ralliart stuff... well... ya know.

Do yourself a favor and dont get the Cosworth head. You dont need it and you wont benefit from it. Your HP/per $ spent ratio will be .0025hp for $1.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #10  
4ringturncoat's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: MI
Originally Posted by Dboey
Thank you guys for your views. Presently my car set up are:

1) Ralliart intake pipe with HKS Super Flow filter
2) Ralliart Intercooler piping with Nisei Intercooler
3) Walbro Fuel pump, 1000cc fuel Injectors & Autronic ECU
4) HKS 264 Cams, HKS Cam gears, HKS valve springs & retainers
5) HPI turbo outlet, HPI 3" downpipe, Mines straight convertor and HKS Silent Hi-Power Exhaust
6) Stock Evo 8MR titanium 10.5 turbo

On the Dyno Dynamics, I am getting 292BHP & 416Nm at the wheels running at 1.65 bars with 98 Octane. My question here is what will be the gains like if I am going to upgrade to a Cosworth head. 10q
I was also using HKS 264's at the time along with a mail-in flash from Dynoflash. I was able to get mid 114 mph out of the old 9.8 turbo. I still would think with your mods you are looking at 10-15hp gain. Just not worth it for $3600, thats $360/hp. Why not do a 20g and bigger cams?

I bolted on a BR3076r and went from 114mph on the stock turbo to 123mph on the 30r, thats close to 100hp gain at the crank for $3000. That seems like a much better option then the head.

Last edited by 4ringturncoat; Aug 16, 2006 at 08:27 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 02:12 PM
  #11  
jbrown's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 0
From: S. Florida
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Youre going to lose low end and midrange punch and get some minimal gains up top since you have the stock turbo.

Judging from your mods, you like to spend money on things you dont need, such as valve springs/retainers which are completely unnecessary with what you have. Also, 1000cc injectors are way overkill but I guess thats OK if you plan to upgrade in the future. Ralliart stuff... well... ya know.

Do yourself a favor and dont get the Cosworth head. You dont need it and you wont benefit from it. Your HP/per $ spent ratio will be .0025hp for $1.
You won't lose low end or midrange punch. You will make more power across the entire rpm band, and if you want to keep your quick stock spool-up and stock appearance, this is a good way to go.

If you want some info from someone with first-hand experience, call Buschur Racing and talk to them about their Stage 3 head.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:07 PM
  #12  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
Originally Posted by RenoEvo
^^^^+1

That would be the biggest waste of money in the history of modding evos.
that's funny, half the people saying this will then turn around and tell buschur his car is the most amazing thing on earth.

the fact is if you open up the engine the turbo will then be the choke point. but saying the above is like saying it's pointless to put cams on the car because it's well documented that as soon as you put cams on the boost will drop more at redline.

but the FACT is that if you want to have a small turbo set up and not lose the top end you MUST do everything in your power to boost up the top end. how do you think buschur is able to squeeze so much out of his car? he has every single top end mod on a car that shouldn't have it! he has a tb, the full staged head, the big boy cams.

THAT'S what this would be good for.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:15 PM
  #13  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by jbrown
You won't lose low end or midrange punch. You will make more power across the entire rpm band, and if you want to keep your quick stock spool-up and stock appearance, this is a good way to go.

If you want some info from someone with first-hand experience, call Buschur Racing and talk to them about their Stage 3 head.
Id LOVE to see a ported head make more power below 4000rpm. Please show me. The only thing Ive seen from them is loss in torque low to mid and big gains up top.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:17 PM
  #14  
evo3matt's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
wasn't curt browns 10.5 on stock turbo w/ a built head? just fyi
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Listen, Im not saying a ported head is worthless... but look at this guys mod list. The Cosworth head should NOT be on his list. He can do a lot of other things instead of spending $3800 on something thats going to give him minimal gains.

Curt Brown's EVO is a drag car with fully built motor, sheetmetal, race gas, methanol and 30+psi. I think thats a different scenario.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:53 PM.