Main bearings and rod bearing gone... :(
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by CO_VR4
I'm really sorry to hear of your misfortune. Lucas is a great choice for straightening out your situtation. I'm wondering how your clearances were off with brand new rotating parts from the same supplier. Guess that will be a topic of discussion somewhere soon.
My current engine build is identical, just used a different machine shop and doing break in now. I'm paranoid to say the least. The Brian CROWER kit was not cheap but I now see it wasn't exactly specifically proven either. I really trust the CROWER name. I hope I can continue to trust it while spinning that crank in my car.Paul if you want to rev high and go scary fast maybe a 2.0 was meant to be!
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,249
Likes: 0
From: Team English Racing
Originally Posted by FlyNavy
My current engine build is identical, just used a different machine shop and doing break in now. I'm paranoid to say the least. The Brian CROWER kit was not cheap but I now see it wasn't exactly specifically proven either. I really trust the CROWER name. I hope I can continue to trust it while spinning that crank in my car. Paul if you want to rev high and go scary fast maybe a 2.0 was meant to be!
Originally Posted by ifarted2
So im going back to a 2.0 but sticking with bc pro rods and cp pistons. Im just going to drag the car most of the time so it will work out good. The BC crank is 102mm which is a huge stroke and limits my revs by alot.
Anyone else running the bc 102mm crank? I would love to know what there input is and there luck with it has been
Anyone else running the bc 102mm crank? I would love to know what there input is and there luck with it has been

I would say keep the 2.0 and go with a 10:1 compression
Brian
Thanks for the nice words guys.
Our Team will do our best and will make it my goal to get the car in the 9s. I felt with the tranny gearing the 2.4 would just be the worng combo. Shifting 5th in the 1/4mi sucks. I think being able to spin the motor to 9k+ will let us stay in 4th. I really feel on a car that is Drag raced alot the 2.0 is a much more Reliable combo.
May have to talk paul into a litttle spary to get off the line right and keep the boost up strong on the shifts
Our Team will do our best and will make it my goal to get the car in the 9s. I felt with the tranny gearing the 2.4 would just be the worng combo. Shifting 5th in the 1/4mi sucks. I think being able to spin the motor to 9k+ will let us stay in 4th. I really feel on a car that is Drag raced alot the 2.0 is a much more Reliable combo.
May have to talk paul into a litttle spary to get off the line right and keep the boost up strong on the shifts
what type of tapping were you getting. I have a ticking noise coming form the head. Probably the lifters. I have about 2,500 miles on my RRE stroker motor. Im a little worried now
Lifters will be taping all the time and go up and down with the Revs. Since Pauls car did not have a spun bearing it sounded like a extra loud lifter put would only clack when you would rev the motor. So if you were at idle and reved it to 4k it would clack on the way to 4k but once there holding the RPM the noise would go away. It made the noise in the same fasion of a bad rod bearing but just had not spun yet so you did not get the deep hammer sound in the motor like a spun bearing.
It really takes a spun bearing to get the big oil pressure drop. I bet Pauls motor would have maybe had a 5-10psi drop on up to temp oil. So unless you have a gauge on there from the start you might not even know you lost oil pressure.
Originally Posted by JMB8606
what type of tapping were you getting. I have a ticking noise coming form the head. Probably the lifters. I have about 2,500 miles on my RRE stroker motor. Im a little worried now


