GT4094R, nobody has tried it on a evo yet?
Evolved Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
im considering this for my car as well.. going to do a little more research.. i have made 643whp on my busa thats only a 1.3L with the 4094 and thats with 8:1 compression as well.. its tough to compare lag though on a bike cause its 1/4 of the weight so you dont feel the lag as much..
heard of a GT35r being used on one (made over 500bhp) but a 4094! thats mad. got and more info/pics/anyhting on it??? was it for a bike or somethign else???
Chris.
Having decided to change my T3 manifold/GT35R combo with something bigger, i would have decided to go for a T4 divided manifold with, probably, a 4088R turbo, as i consider 42Rs too big for having still some streetable powerband.
Looking at Garrett catalog i've seen a new turbo, the 4094R, that seems a conjunction between 4088 and 4294, and i would be tempted to try this....
Has somebody any experience on this turbo? I'm afraid it could bee too laggy, even with a stroker, but i'm also interested in 850 hp capability as declared on Garrett web site.... Thanks....
Looking at Garrett catalog i've seen a new turbo, the 4094R, that seems a conjunction between 4088 and 4294, and i would be tempted to try this....
Has somebody any experience on this turbo? I'm afraid it could bee too laggy, even with a stroker, but i'm also interested in 850 hp capability as declared on Garrett web site.... Thanks....
I am doing the same thing, bu t with something new from presicion, it SHOULD spool up faster than a 4094, we'll see, I had a GT35r with T04 housing and got 634whp out of it ALL BOOST and 488whp (with modest tunning) on pump gas.
The GT4094 is one of my favorites, but I think is a little to big for ALL boost performance, so I'll stay with the prototype from presicion and let you guys n=know how it goes on Tuesday...
Evolved Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
here is a 35R on one! looks tiny compeard to yours (the turbo!)! lol
http://www.lancerregister.com/showth...ight=1.3+turbo
thanks Chris.
Evolving Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 248
Likes: 1
From: Malaysia
the question here really is comparing both a GT4294R vs a GT4094R,on both a .91 A/R turbine side, is the spool and max power capability the same? Have recently ran a 2.18 litre on a 4294R and the power it makes so easily is just hard to go back to a T67 anymore. the 4294R makes over 800 WHP easily even at higher boost. The 35R and 67 is close with the 67 making a touch more but much laggier. the 42R is laggier but kicks real hard on boost.
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: Chile
Hi
You got a 2.0 or 2.3 motor? how does it make fullboost the 4067? what a/r ,can you give a little brief about this turbo?, what other mods you got if you dont mind to share.
Sorry for to many questions thanks.
sorry about the offtopic.
Last edited by JPSR20DET; Jun 30, 2007 at 08:58 PM.
Evolved Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
the question here really is comparing both a GT4294R vs a GT4094R,on both a .91 A/R turbine side, is the spool and max power capability the same? Have recently ran a 2.18 litre on a 4294R and the power it makes so easily is just hard to go back to a T67 anymore. the 4294R makes over 800 WHP easily even at higher boost. The 35R and 67 is close with the 67 making a touch more but much laggier. the 42R is laggier but kicks real hard on boost.
Chris.
We'll see I'm very interested in Full-Races new offerring.
Slowmotion Motorsports here in Columbus Oh just built a Honda EK Hatch with a K24 bottom end with a K20 head (Acura 2.4L bottom end and RSX-S head) with that turbo on it which would be comparable to a 2.3L Mitsu and it spooled very quick (4500rpm) and made 600whp on only 21psi. So I would love to see this turbo on an Evo...I say go for it!
Evolved Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
I've always felt that way too, but so far the results have told a different story. Talk to some of the vendors and not too many like the 40R variants. The lag seems to not be worth the power over a 37R and if you going to go that big everyone loves the 42R variants.
We'll see I'm very interested in Full-Races new offerring.
We'll see I'm very interested in Full-Races new offerring.
as you said, maybe full-race will beable to get something out of the 4094s.
how about a 4002??? could that really work???? would it reduce spool up much????
Chris.
the 40-02 would be possible however it would work very poorly due to the massive turbine to compressor mismatch. It would make a lot of dyno power but it would be terribly lazy with poor throttle response
Evolved Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
From: UK
i think the main reason most people didnt like the 40R is becuase they used it with the wrong manifold configuration/design and the wrong turbine setup. The 40R is very sensitive to this, but when you get it right it works incredibly well
the 40R setup we are about to release will definately change some minds about 40Rs. We will have a 42R setup as well.
the 40-02 would be possible however it would work very poorly due to the massive turbine to compressor mismatch. It would make a lot of dyno power but it would be terribly lazy with poor throttle response
the 40R setup we are about to release will definately change some minds about 40Rs. We will have a 42R setup as well.
the 40-02 would be possible however it would work very poorly due to the massive turbine to compressor mismatch. It would make a lot of dyno power but it would be terribly lazy with poor throttle response
thanks for clearing that up!
Chris.