Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

GT4094R, nobody has tried it on a evo yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 02:08 PM
  #1  
giangi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Italy
GT4094R, nobody has tried it on a evo yet?

Having decided to change my T3 manifold/GT35R combo with something bigger, i would have decided to go for a T4 divided manifold with, probably, a 4088R turbo, as i consider 42Rs too big for having still some streetable powerband.
Looking at Garrett catalog i've seen a new turbo, the 4094R, that seems a conjunction between 4088 and 4294, and i would be tempted to try this....
Has somebody any experience on this turbo? I'm afraid it could bee too laggy, even with a stroker, but i'm also interested in 850 hp capability as declared on Garrett web site.... Thanks....
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #2  
MRevolutionRed's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Green Book, NJ
if your gonna go that big stay 2.0. you will be able to rev much higher.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 02:52 PM
  #3  
Sharkbite2000's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,898
Likes: 14
From: Eugene, Oregon
Dam that would be intresting to see i think it just to big.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 03:10 PM
  #4  
Jax419's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 1
From: Lakeview, Chicago
Originally Posted by MRevolutionRed
if your gonna go that big stay 2.0. you will be able to rev much higher.
+1 what he said!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 03:44 PM
  #5  
Spooldyou's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
From: Boston,MA
Procco Evo has one ran a 9.2xx something like that with a 75 shot was it ...I know im not Right, but its something simliar to that.!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 03:49 PM
  #6  
EvoAnthony's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: SlowmotionMotorsports.com
Slowmotion Motorsports here in Columbus Oh just built a Honda EK Hatch with a K24 bottom end with a K20 head (Acura 2.4L bottom end and RSX-S head) with that turbo on it which would be comparable to a 2.3L Mitsu and it spooled very quick (4500rpm) and made 600whp on only 21psi. So I would love to see this turbo on an Evo...I say go for it!
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #7  
KartaRailed's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville/Boca Raton
Originally Posted by EvoAnthony
Slowmotion Motorsports here in Columbus Oh just built a Honda EK Hatch with a K24 bottom end with a K20 head (Acura 2.4L bottom end and RSX-S head) with that turbo on it which would be comparable to a 2.3L Mitsu and it spooled very quick (4500rpm) and made 600whp on only 21psi. So I would love to see this turbo on an Evo...I say go for it!
Wow, spooling at 4500 rpms, what kind of safe redline were they seeing? Thats pretty impressive for a 2.4L motor.
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
Evo4Ash@D's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: Earth
go for it
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 11:30 PM
  #9  
giangi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Italy
I can't decide, the twin scroll configuration of that turbo combined with a proper divided manifold should help for spool, i know that it will give massive power, but i'm afraid of having too little powerband....
Mmmh, 4088R or 4094R?
Please, help me....
Reply
Old Feb 22, 2007 | 11:48 PM
  #10  
Frenchy4g63's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,013
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
E-mail geoff@full-race.com he should be able to help you out.

Like I told you in a PM, the only thing I've heard about the 4094r is that it spools slower than a 4088r but makes more power. I cant say if they were using a true twin scroll setup though..

Geoff should be able to help you out though, he's helped me more than a few times.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #11  
giangi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Thank you very much for the info, i'll try to contact him...
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #12  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
The GT4294R doesn't spool THAT much later then the GT4088R.

If I recall correctly, when I mapped out the GT4094R, it looked like it would surge below 6000 RPM anyway. The GT4294R will be making enough power by 6000 RPM that you really won't care if it has a little extra lag.

The GT4094R does have the advantage of being a smaller (externally) turbocharger though. You can likely shoehorn in the GT4094R without doing a half width radiator.
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:49 AM
  #13  
giangi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Could you give me an idea about the full boost rpm on the 4094R, i'm a little worrying about lag, the car is not mainly for drag use...
If i could have a decent spool, starting to push hard starting from 4500 rpm or so, that turbo could be the ideal choice for me....
I would be thinking about a 1.06 exhaust AR, as it's a twin scroll turbo, is it a good choice, if combined to a twin scroll manifold?
Thanks...
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 07:59 AM
  #14  
2SloEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by giangi
Could you give me an idea about the full boost rpm on the 4094R, i'm a little worrying about lag, the car is not mainly for drag use...
If i could have a decent spool, starting to push hard starting from 4500 rpm or so, that turbo could be the ideal choice for me....
I would be thinking about a 1.06 exhaust AR, as it's a twin scroll turbo, is it a good choice, if combined to a twin scroll manifold?
Thanks...
I would look for a smaller a/r than a 1.06 that will surely be laggy even with a stroker!
Reply
Old Feb 23, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #15  
fimotorsports's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (92)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,590
Likes: 3
From: San Diego CA
Originally Posted by Spooldyou
Procco Evo has one ran a 9.2xx something like that with a 75 shot was it ...I know im not Right, but its something simliar to that.!

yes Procco has a 4067 which is similar to the "gt37" or pt67 turbo this 4088 has been tried on 2.0 and 2.3 with not much success, too much lag, not enough power. I would go with what works.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:23 AM.