Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Installed TBE, Lost power...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:13 PM
  #16  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
I know boost is solid due to recording it via defi BF's, so no loss of power due to boost
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:16 PM
  #17  
thatguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: milfburn
Originally Posted by electricevo
I have a hallman MBC set to 23psi spike, 20ish psi redline. I am tuning it myself once my wideband gets in.
Not normal.

I would get an eflash from a tuner and see if that could work the knock counts out, and how accurate is the software you are using to measuring hp?

Maybe visiting a local dyno wouldn't be a bad idea.

Also what are program are you using for logging?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #18  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
Not normal.

I would get an eflash from a tuner and see if that could work the knock counts out, and how accurate is the software you are using to measuring hp?

Maybe visiting a local dyno wouldn't be a bad idea.
I am using data log labs software and i know its not extremely accurate for measuring HP/TQ initially, but measuring the difference between two runs in the same conditions it should be fairly accurate.

DLL claims 2-5% accuracy, but a 25HP loss is huge....
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #19  
thatguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: milfburn
Possible boost leak or other mechanical error?

Electric do a boost leak test, and let us know how that works.

Last edited by thatguy; Feb 28, 2007 at 05:30 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #20  
80210's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO

"ECU automatically reduces boost because of increased airflow if i recall correctly (the airflow part not ecu reducing boost)"



I don't see how you would be able to make gains by adding a TBE without a tune then?
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:26 PM
  #21  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
Possible boost leak or other mechanical error?
No boost leak because it still holds 20+psi till redline, and there was about an hour difference between the two runs.

I did a pass, logged it, went to my shop, threw my car up on my lift and installed the TBE, went back out and did another pass at the same location.

The car has 3410 miles, so i doubt anything mechanical...
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:28 PM
  #22  
tony_b's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: mASSachusetts
Originally Posted by electricevo
No boost leak because it still holds 20+psi till redline, and there was about an hour difference between the two runs.

I did a pass, logged it, went to my shop, threw my car up on my lift and installed the TBE, went back out and did another pass at the same location.

The car has 3410 miles, so i doubt anything mechanical...
Just because it holds boost doesn't mean you don't have a boost leak. You'll be making the turbo work harder to keep that boost level though.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:28 PM
  #23  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
"ECU automatically reduces boost because of increased airflow if i recall correctly (the airflow part not ecu reducing boost)"


I don't see how you would be able to make gains by adding a TBE without a tune then?
80210,

Dont forget that i have a Hallman MBC that bypasses the boost solenoid circuit so the ecu no longer has control over my boost.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:29 PM
  #24  
thatguy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: milfburn
Originally Posted by 80210

"ECU automatically reduces boost because of increased airflow if i recall correctly (the airflow part not ecu reducing boost)"


Use a MBC.

I don't see how you would be able to make gains by adding a TBE without a tune then?
I am 100% that the ecu reduces boost once you install a TBE on an IX but not 100% why.

I think you will run into some fuel cut issues with a tbe exhaust + mbc but no tune.

If i'm incorrect about that somebody please correct me (long day studying glia cells).
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:30 PM
  #25  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
3312.5 0 -4 297.97
3406.25 3 -5 294.15
3531.25 3 -2 279.42

Since you installed the TBE you are hitting a higher load column with less timing in it, look at your timing in the log. Stock 9's hit about 1 or 2*, not -5 and -2

The 9 stock rom has alot less timing at peak torque in the higher loads, as you can see from your log. It quickly goes from +1* to -5*. That's a big change.

That is where your torque went. Same thing with up top with horsepower. Untill you can tune it, lower your boost and you will fall in the lower load columns with more timing.
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #26  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
Just because it holds boost doesn't mean you don't have a boost leak. You'll be making the turbo work harder to keep that boost level though.
True, but that would most likely lead to premature turbo failure rather than loss of power right?

Actually, it might send it out of its effeciency range....Let me go do a boost leak check...Ill be back in about a half hour....
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 05:35 PM
  #27  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
Since you installed the TBE you are hitting a higher load column with less timing in it, look at your timing in the log. Stock 9's hit about 1 or 2*, not -5 and -2

The 9 stock rom has alot less timing at peak torque in the higher loads, as you can see from your log. It quickly goes from +1* to -5*. That's a big change.

That is where your torque went. Untill you can tune it, lower your boost and you will fall in the lower load columns with more timing. Same thing with up top.
Ahh, that makes sense. I was wondering my i had alot more negative values for ignition timing. Also, it is in this range where i am experiencing knock...I dont have a wideband 02 yet, but do you think if a add a small margin of fuel here, I will get rid of knock?

Or should i just wait for my wideband? I only ask because it will be a minimum of a week before i recieve it. Also, after i add my fuel, will timing work itself out, or should i fine tune it as well?
__________________
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 06:18 PM
  #28  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
Originally Posted by electricevo
Ahh, that makes sense. I was wondering my i had alot more negative values for ignition timing. Also, it is in this range where i am experiencing knock...I dont have a wideband 02 yet, but do you think if a add a small margin of fuel here, I will get rid of knock?

Or should i just wait for my wideband? I only ask because it will be a minimum of a week before i recieve it. Also, after i add my fuel, will timing work itself out, or should i fine tune it as well?
__________________
Not only are you most likely in a higher load column(which will have less ignition timing on the high octane ignition map), you ran into some knock which also caused the ECU to pull out more timing, look at the timing on the low octane ignition map and see where you sit in that load range. That jump in ignition timing(retarded) will cause significant loss of power and high EGT's.

CJ
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 06:21 PM
  #29  
iTune's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Jacksonville
Also, i don't recommend you do ANY tuning until you get your wideband installed and learn how to use it and log with it. Then and only then, would i mess with timing and or fuel. For now, turn your boost down a bit until you can do some AFR logging. The knock could be a combination of lean AFR's and over advanced ignition timing for the boost pressures you are running(causing you to be in a load column thats not perfect for your engine/set-up)

CJ
Reply
Old Feb 28, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #30  
electricevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: MA
Not only are you most likely in a higher load column(which will have less ignition timing on the high octane ignition map), you ran into some knock which also caused the ECU to pull out more timing, look at the timing on the low octane ignition map and see where you sit in that load range. That jump in ignition timing(retarded) will cause significant loss of power and high EGT's.
Why would i check the low octane Ign map over the high octane? My octane scale is at 100% and octane flag is solid 99.23. Would some other factor cause my car to consult these low octane maps?

Also, i don't recommend you do ANY tuning until you get your wideband installed and learn how to use it and log with it. Then and only then, would i mess with timing and or fuel. For now, turn your boost down a bit until you can do some AFR logging. The knock could be a combination of lean AFR's and over advanced ignition timing for the boost pressures you are running(causing you to be in a load column thats not perfect for your engine/set-up)
Yeah, it would def. be the best thing but i am so eager to fix things...But you're right, i have to wait...I was thinking about trying to get the timing back to stock figures and add alittle fuel in the area of knock..(recommended by a friend and member) but im not sure if i should...

I only want to change the parameters that i can monitor, but i know a little fuel will help with knock...
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 PM.