Green Numbers from today.....Thanks CFT!!
.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: palm coast
LOL, the dynosheet in my signature is 405whp/445tq on stock 2005 turbo on the CFT dyno.
The correction factor is much lower than 16-18%.
You should have been tuned to 21-23psi.
The car should have put out 375-390whp on 93 at the least for that dyno.
If you are interested in really getting your car tuned, send me a PM as I am in Orlando. Hell, we can even tune it on the same dyno again and show you what you're missing.
Substantial improvements guaranteed or tuning is free.
The correction factor is much lower than 16-18%.
You should have been tuned to 21-23psi.
The car should have put out 375-390whp on 93 at the least for that dyno.
If you are interested in really getting your car tuned, send me a PM as I am in Orlando. Hell, we can even tune it on the same dyno again and show you what you're missing.
Substantial improvements guaranteed or tuning is free.
I will tell you guys after tomorrow, when I will put my car on a DynoJet Dyno.
Everyone that is making an opinion with with the CFT numbers, have not Dynowed their cars there in ove a year. I however, was there 2 months ago as you can see on my sig. After the 20G-LT install. 30-31 psi of boost.
The Dyno at CFT was given the 7 year maintenance overhaul after only a few years of operation. Because they Dyno so many cars there. After the work was done, the Dyno reads much lower than it used to last year and the year before that.
We will see how good the experts on this thread that are guessing do once I get my car on the DynoJet rollers.
I will be back tomorrow night to talk more about the numbers,
.
Everyone that is making an opinion with with the CFT numbers, have not Dynowed their cars there in ove a year. I however, was there 2 months ago as you can see on my sig. After the 20G-LT install. 30-31 psi of boost.
The Dyno at CFT was given the 7 year maintenance overhaul after only a few years of operation. Because they Dyno so many cars there. After the work was done, the Dyno reads much lower than it used to last year and the year before that.
We will see how good the experts on this thread that are guessing do once I get my car on the DynoJet rollers.
I will be back tomorrow night to talk more about the numbers,
.
Manny and I strap'd our cars to the DynoJet at Fynetune, Miami, Fl.
Both of us made more power in this Dyno.
After some calculations and looking at the numbers, we conclude that CFT Dyno reads ~5 to ~6 % less than the DynoJet.
Not like a Mustang, and not like a DynoJet; More like in the middle of both, .
Both of us made more power in this Dyno.
After some calculations and looking at the numbers, we conclude that CFT Dyno reads ~5 to ~6 % less than the DynoJet.
Not like a Mustang, and not like a DynoJet; More like in the middle of both,
.
Can't say how happy I am with John's work! Here is a review, and other's comments: https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=237375
An interesting read if I don't say so myself...