Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

new numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #1  
nikkadanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 1
From: fort worth, tx
new numbers

Redynod my car on a mustang dyno and i'm pretty happy, numbers on a dynojet sucked it was 314 hp and 285 tq on 22 psi and the new numbers are 312hp and 297 on 22 psi, i will post vids and graph here in a lil bit, mods are uicp,licp,o2 housing,mbc,tbe no cats, intake and a tune oh and a ebay front mount
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:33 PM
  #2  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
What changed? I was pretty sure at the time it wasn't Kevin D's fault.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:46 PM
  #3  
nikkadanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 1
From: fort worth, tx
nothing changed i just added the fmic and thats it, so are those numbers ok on that dyno?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #4  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
I don't know about that dyno. They look low for a IX, but the track will tell the tale.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 04:30 PM
  #5  
uglyevo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
numbers look pretty low for the mods
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 05:15 PM
  #6  
nikkadanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 1
From: fort worth, tx
on a mustang dyno? its 10% lower if you multiply 1.1x 312 you get 343 or something but heres the graph

Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 06:21 PM
  #7  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
it depends. Not all MDs read that low. Some read like Dynojets, some read like Dyno Dynamics, and some read in between. It really depends on what a stock IX puts down. That's why it's important to dyno BEFORE and after mods.

In this case, though, why in the HELL does the run stop at 5500rpm??? The run should go to 7500rpm. Please tell me they don't stop that early on all Evos. That would explain a lot, haha. Notice your curve is still climbing? We normally peak cloesr to 6500rpm unless running high boost.

PS. Look how early the boost hits - your peak torque rpm is awesome.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #8  
robertrinaustin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Looks like it stops around 7200 rpm, but the real question is what stock EVOs put down. I know there was about 50 whp diference between the Mustang in Austin and a Mustang in the DFW area with the Austin dyno reading much lower.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 06:38 PM
  #9  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Ah, the page split throws it off. However, it's somehow still climbing there by 7250. That's not a normal Evo HP curve.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 10:48 PM
  #10  
nikkadanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 1
From: fort worth, tx
i stopped it at 7200, but i'll try to get a stock 9 dynod there
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:28 AM
  #11  
Curt941's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
here was my dyno sheet:

306 whp
302 wtq

Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #12  
Clutchdc5's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,623
Likes: 1
From: at the 5-10 no limit tables
thats an odd dyno sheet....
looks like a toque USDM
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #13  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by Clutchdc5
looks like a toque USDM
A what?
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #14  
nikkadanny's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 1
From: fort worth, tx
^ HAHA thats what i was thinking
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 08:54 AM
  #15  
evo_08's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: bush LA
so who made the most power?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:59 PM.