Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

recommend me some cams

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 09:55 PM
  #76  
OCEVONERD's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Garden Grove
cosworth. friend just got them installed and they straight romp. 272 with new injectors of course. should be doing pretty good numbers
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #77  
GT35REVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Not on the stock turbo.

stock turbo is finea guy in hawaii and them on his stock turbo/stock ecu eveo
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #78  
idriveanevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: in my Evo
OK, im going for the most power here, if i go with 280 would i be better off?
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2007 | 11:13 PM
  #79  
raiceboi697's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY
if you can get us some before and after numbers and mods that would be nice..im leaning to the cosworth my self right now. it seems like all the other big boy cams are built for big boy turbos and woudnt be anything more then a waste of money and make a lot of noise on a stock turbo car
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 07:18 AM
  #80  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by idriveanevo
OK, im going for the most power here, if i go with 280 would i be better off?
vs 272's yes. And no, you don't need bigger injectors, as long as you have a fuel pump.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #81  
1mad evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
wouldnt reccomend 280s on stock turbo as they will only make the extra power at higher revs, like 8000rpm where your stock turbo looses its efficiency, stick to 272 max on stock tubby guys
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #82  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Originally Posted by 1mad evo
wouldnt reccomend 280s on stock turbo as they will only make the extra power at higher revs, like 8000rpm where your stock turbo looses its efficiency, stick to 272 max on stock tubby guys
I completely disagree. Check out the graph I posted above.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #83  
AtO-MiX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,TX
Cant go wrong with GSC plus you can keep your stock valve springs and retainers. I went the GSC v2 272/264 cant wait for my install and tune in july.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 10:48 AM
  #84  
tweakdsm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 5
From: Illinois
i got 272/272 hks.... cant go wrong with these, put over 25k on the car with these bad boys...
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 11:05 AM
  #85  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by GT35REVO8
stock turbo is finea guy in hawaii and them on his stock turbo/stock ecu eveo
Ohhh ok, since "a guy in Hawaii" has them on his turbo, its o.k. then. Are you serious? The JUN cams are NOT for the stock turbo, period. They are incredibly aggressive and are meant for larger turbos that will utilize a high RPM range or some just crazy setup. Buschur tried aggressive cams on the Green for christ sake and they wouldnt work either. Wht makes u think they are great on the stock turbo.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 04:40 PM
  #86  
ciobing's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Italy
Originally Posted by Soon2BEVO
Ohhh ok, since "a guy in Hawaii" has them on his turbo, its o.k. then. Are you serious? The JUN cams are NOT for the stock turbo, period. They are incredibly aggressive and are meant for larger turbos that will utilize a high RPM range or some just crazy setup. Buschur tried aggressive cams on the Green for christ sake and they wouldnt work either. Wht makes u think they are great on the stock turbo.
272 or 264 too?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2007 | 08:20 PM
  #87  
Soon2BEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,653
Likes: 0
From: Toms River, NJ
Originally Posted by ciobing
272 or 264 too?

Both. A guy on here added he JUN 264s to his 50trim and I dont even think gained 10whp over his HKS cams. You will see gains with cams lke the JUNs over HKS when you have BIG setups such as a GT35R built setup going to 8500rpm.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #88  
raiceboi697's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY
well all thoughts aside on the pros and cons of juns on the stock turbo... does anyone else have so thought on cams for a stock turbo
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2007 | 03:19 PM
  #89  
nyaegermeister's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: New Albany, IN
Originally Posted by raiceboi697
well all thoughts aside on the pros and cons of juns on the stock turbo... does anyone else have so thought on cams for a stock turbo
GSC S1's. You'll love the low end and mid range power with these. Jun's and 280's and such are more for the strip. If you're just going to be having fun with your car and cruising around on the street get the S1's.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #90  
idriveanevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
From: in my Evo
so i think ive decided on a set of comp 280s. anybody have experience with these?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 AM.